English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23406075      Online Users : 140
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98756

    Title: An Analytic Study on Permanent Injunction in Patent Litigations
    Authors: 宋皇志
    Sung, Huang-Chih
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: Patent;permanent injunction;"eBay" case;analytic study;NPE
    Date: 2015-12
    Issue Date: 2016-07-07 15:41:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: This paper conducted an analytic study to realize how the Federal Courts in the United States applied "eBay"'s opinion in the subsequent cases. The analytic study shows that a competition between the plaintiff and the defendant in the market is the most important factor for the courts to award an injunctive relief. The competitions between the plaintiff and the defendant can be divided into three categories: (1) the patent owner is a direct competitor of the defendant; (2) the patentee is an indirect competitor of the defendant; and (3) the patent holder is a research institute competing with other research institutes and universities in the technology market. The analytic study also shows that there have been the following four kinds of mechanisms to compensate a patentee who has already prevailed on the merits and been awarded damages but didn't obtain a permanent injunction relief : (1) without providing any further remedy; (2) to order the plaintiff to file a new lawsuit for the defendant's subsequent infringement after trial; (3) to award an ongoing royalty to the plaintiff; and (4) to award a compulsory license and an ongoing royalty to the plaintiff. This paper also discusses how "eBay" influences on NPEs and finds that the NPEs with R&D and the NPEs without R&D should be differently considered in permanent injunction proceedings. The NPEs without R&D should be hard to obtain a permanent injunction, but the NPEs with R&D should be possible to obtain a permanent injunction.
    Relation: NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 4(2), 2-38
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6521/NTUTJIPLM.2015.4(2).2
    DOI: 10.6521/NTUTJIPLM.2015.4(2).2
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    2-38.pdf1198KbAdobe PDF401View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback