English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118697 (75%)
Visitors : 23577922      Online Users : 218
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98031


    Title: 精神疾病與雇主之職業災害補償及民事賠償責任——兼評臺灣板橋地方法院一○○年度勞訴字第一號判決
    Other Titles: Mental Diseases, Workers' Compensation, and Civil Liability for Damages: Comments on the (100) Lao-Su No. 1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan Banciao District Court
    Authors: 徐婉寧
    Hsu, Wan-Ning
    Keywords: 職業災害;被保險人因執行職務而致傷病審查準則第二十一條之 一;工作相關心理壓力事件引起精神疾病認定參考指引;損害賠償;勞保條例;職業病種類表;職業災害勞工保護法第七條;民法 第四八七條之一;通勤災害;職業疾病鑑定
    Mental Diseases;Workers’ Compensation;Labor Insurance Act;Labor Standards Law;Civil Law;Occupational Diseases;Civil Liability For Damages
    Date: 2013-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 10:50:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 精神疾病是否屬於職業災害補償之範圍,於我國向有爭議。勞委會近年來雖正式將精神疾病納入職災勞保給付的範圍,然實際上獲得給付的案例十分有限,且雇主對於因工作壓力引起精神疾病之勞工是否應負勞基法上的職災補償責任或民法上的損害賠償責任仍有疑義。本文藉著評釋我國關於雇主職災補償責任及民事賠償責任中,第一個言及判斷精神疾病是否屬於勞保條例上職業災害之「工作相關心理壓力事件引起精神疾病認定參考指引」的臺灣板橋地方法院一○○年度勞訴字第一號判決,來檢討我國職業災害救濟制度之問題點,特別是精神疾病與雇主之職業災害補償責任、民事賠償責任,以及職災勞保給付認定間複雜的關係,並試圖透過日本法之介紹與探討,進一步為比較法的分析。
    Whether mental diseases are compensable is an important issue in the workers’ compensation system in Taiwan. According to the Labor Insurance Act, work-related mental diseases shall be considered as occupational diseases. However, coverage for mental diseases is usually denied; therefore, the validity of the standard, the guideline of identifying work-related stress-induced mental diseases, is doubted. Besides, whether employers should pay compensation according to the Labor Standards Law, whether employees have the right to recover damages according to Civil Law, and the relationships among the Labor Insurance Act, the Labor Standards Law and Civil Law are also controversial issues. This thesis not only gives comments on the (100) Lao-Su No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan Banciao District Court, in which the guideline of identifying work-related stress-induced mental diseases is first mentioned, but also discusses the issues above and undertakes a comparative study on Japan.
    Relation: 法學評論, 134,115-172頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013090134003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013090134003
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    134-3.pdf962KbAdobe PDF174View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback