English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71578/104447 (69%)
造訪人次 : 19159772      線上人數 : 419
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97866


    題名: 1990年與1996年男女教育量差異與發展類型探索
    其他題名: Exploring Gender Differences in Education and Clustering the Pattern of Development in 1990 and 1996
    作者: 張芳全
    關鍵詞: 男女性初等教育在學率差異 ; 男女性中等教育在學率差異 ; 男女性高等教育在學率差異
     The ratio of male and female primary education difference ; The ratio of male and female secondary education difference ; The ratio of male and female higher education difference
    日期: 2003-06
    上傳時間: 2016-06-13 11:07:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 男女性別教育量的差異,向來為人忽視。本研究以聯合國教科文組織統計(United Nation Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization,簡稱為UNESCO,2000)與中華民國教育統計(民89)的1990年及1996年資料,探索各國男女性教育在學率之差異為男女性教育在學率差異的國家分類情形。本研究得到結果如下:第一、1990年與1996年各國之男女性的初等教育在學率、中等教育在學率、高等教育在學率的幾尼係數,大致是女性高於男性,表示女性的教育機會低於男性;同時如果以全球的初等、中等及高等教育在學率進行幾尼係數計算,發現初等教育在學率的均等率最高,其次為中等教育在學率,第三為高等教育在學率。第二、在男女性教育指標差異量的國家分類上,不同的男女性教育指標差異量的分類,有不同的國家數;就如1996年的二個指標的分類、高度、中度及低度男女性教育量差異的國家數;就如1996年的二個指標的分類,高度、中度及低度男女性教育量差異的國家數各有31、38及9個。第三、以區別分析檢定1990及1996年分類準確度在96%以上。第四、以斯皮爾曼相關檢定各種分類,其相關係數在.601至.808之間,達0.1顯著水準。第五、1990及1996年之高度、中度、低度男女性教育在學率差異的國家分類後,如以變異數分析檢定三群之間,都有差異,達到0.1顯著水準,經事後比較發現,各群之間大都有顯著差異。最後,檢定台灣的男女性教育在學率的差異,她大致被列為男女性教育量差異均等的國家群組。
    Gender disparity is always ignored. The main purpose of this study uses the raw data which was collected from the United Nation Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization(UNESCO,2000)and Education Statistics of the ROC(2000)about the ratio of males and females in education in 1990/1996 to understand gender disparity worldwide, and uses the ratio of female primary, secondary, and higher education to cluster that pattern of development. The research results are as follows:First, using the ratio of male and female primary education to calculate the Gini index, the results are found that all the females’ Gini indices are higher than the male’s in the ratio of primary, secondary, and higher education, in 1991 and 1996, respectively;that is, the educational opportunity of males is higher than female’s in all levels of education. Second, because the indicators are different, the countries form three groups in the Cluster Analysis, that is high ratio of educational difference countries, middle ratio of educational difference countries, and low ratio of educational difference countries are different. For instance, using two indicators in 1996 can form three groups, that is, high, middle, and low ratio of educational difference countries are 31,38 and 9, respectively. Fourth, in order to test the consistency of these clusters, Discriminant Analysis is used to reclassify the 4 clustered countries. Above 96% of countries are correctly classified by the indicators. Fifth, the Spearman rank correlation is used to test the rank of the clustered countries by using 4 clustered countries. The correlations are between .602 to .808, and there are significant (p<.01), too. Finally, according to the discriminant scores of the ratio of education difference, in the ROC, Taiwan, three clusters are classified as a middle ratio of educational difference country.
    關聯: 教育與心理研究, 26(2),241-276
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML395檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML440檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋