English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88866/118573 (75%)
Visitors : 23566906      Online Users : 287
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95798


    Title: 系統思考與政策網絡之應用:委外系統網絡課責的建立
    Other Titles: Bridging Systems Thinking to Policy Networks:An Application to Developing Network Accountability of Contracting Out System
    Authors: 李翠萍
    Le, Tsuey-Ping
    Keywords: Thinking;Network Learning;Network Accountability;Policy Networks
    系統思考;網絡學習;網絡課責;政策網絡
    Date: 2004-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 10:08:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 系統思考(systems thinking)和政策網絡(policy networks)在公共政策研究領域中已盛行多年,由於此兩種途徑有許多相似的特質,而同時二者的相異之處又可在政策研究中達到互補的功能,因此,本研究試圖將系統思考與政策網絡相連結,來探討社會福利委外系統中網絡課責(network accountability)的建構。首先,系統思考在「揭露限制系統績效的結構性瑕疵」、與「解釋為何意圖良善的的政策會導致非預期的結果」兩方面,被視為一個有效的工具。同時,系統思考的優點在於提供系統行動者一個積極的觀點來思考各自在系統中所扮演的角色,並採取全方位的整體思維來檢視系統,更提供了「槓桿解」以改進系統績效。而另外一方面,政策網絡的概念強調網絡參與者之間透過資源交換而產生的相互依賴關係,此一概念能夠幫助網絡參與者視自己為資源的擁有者,而非僅是消極回應環境的行動者。本研究認為,課責系統能藉由改變網絡行動者的自我認知(self-recognition)而建構得更為完善,並進而改善系統的績效。
    This study intends to propose a combination of systems thinking and policy networks perspective in developing network accountability of contracting out social services. Both systems thinking and policy networks have been applied to public policy analysis for many years. As a perspective that emphasizes the whole rather than fragmented parts, systems thinking has been considered effective in uncovering structural flaws that limit system performance and explaining why a well-intended policy intervention fails to produce expected results. The strength of systems thinking is to offer system actors: 1) an active perspective of their own role in the system, 2) a holistic view of the system, and furthermore, 3) the leverage solutions for improving system performance. On the other hand, the concept of policy networks emphasizes interdependent relations among network participants and their resource exchanges. This concept can help network participants identify themselves as resource holders rather than passive actors merely responding to reality. This paper attempts to examine the similarities and differences between systems thinking and policy networks. This study believes that a system of accountability can be constructed more completely by altering self-recognition of network actors, thus improving system performance.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 13,91-119
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    13(p.91-119).pdf193KbAdobe PDF120View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback