English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118697 (75%)
Visitors : 23573879      Online Users : 234
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95085


    Title: 後 Web 2.0時代開放競爭策略之研究
    The study of the open competition strategy in post Web 2.0 era
    Authors: 楊孝先
    Yang, Hsiao Hsien
    Contributors: 劉江彬
    Liu, Paul C. B.
    楊孝先
    Yang, Hsiao Hsien
    Keywords: Web 2.0
    開放策略
    競爭策略
    超競爭
    Web 2.0
    Open Strategy
    Competitive Strategy
    Hypercompetition
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:06:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 以往之網際網路相關研究,並未就 Web 2.0一詞提出簡單明確且涵蓋廣泛之解釋,故本研究首先嘗試提出一 Web 2.0之通用意涵:「網路參與者更容易重組及排列網路元素的網際網路演化狀態。」,並將 Web 2.0從流行名詞轉而充分融入各網際網路服務的階段設定為後 Web 2.0時代。
    近年來網際網路已經越來越朝向開放發展,而本研究發現開放的發展主要可分為三個階段:第一,於 Web 2.0時代以前,開放的機制即已奠定基礎,此階段主要的發展來自於技術與架構方面;第二,Web 2.0時代,開放的觀念與能力逐漸成熟,此階段的趨力主要來自於使用者與開發者社群之互動;第三,後 Web 2.0時代,企業之開放策略形成,正式進入商業與程序主導的開放階段。本研究並羅列混搭的類型,以之為涵蓋範圍,結合其成員及網路關係,試圖解構出網際網路的開放生態系。
    在說明追求競爭優勢的傳統理論在 Web 2.0時代已經失效之後,本研究針對開放的動態策略互動進行脈絡化整理,建構出擴充超競爭理論的第五個競技場—開放競技場理論,其中,各動態策略互動之內涵與造成的影響分別為:使用者產生內容造成控制權移轉;開放內容混搭突破傳統網站壁壘;以開放 API 解放創新枷鎖;以開放平台收編第三方開發者;以開放社交資料收編中小型網站;以及資料可攜將所有高牆剷平。開放競技場的假想終點,就是一種所有服務、技術、內容,及資料等都完全開放的狀態。開放競技場的網際網路企業,一方面要追求開放以獲得競爭優勢,一方面又要避免達到沒有人有競爭優勢的完全開放狀態。
    本研究並認為,台灣網際網路產業由於現存者的不作為,目前並未進入開放競技場,且因為缺乏開放競技場的動態策略互動經驗,廠商普遍而言難以進入超競爭之國際市場,僅能專注本地市場。
    Former Internet studies did not provide a simple and inclusive explanation to the concept of Web 2.0. Therefore, this study proposed a universal meaning of Web 2.0: "the Internet evolution stage in which its participants are more easy to reassemble and arrange Internet elements." Moreover, post Web 2.0 era is defined as the period when the buzzword of Web 2.0 becomes prevalent in Internet services.
    In recent years, the Internet is becoming more and more open. This study found that the development of openness can be divided into three stages. (1) Before Web 2.0, the open mechanism has already set its root. The development of this stage is a result of technology and architecture. (2) In Web 2.0 era, as the concept and capability of 'openness' are gradually mature, the driving force behind this stage involved the interaction of user and developer communities. (3) Following the formation of open strategy, the effects of business and process are predominant in post Web 2.0 era. The study has also listed the types of mashups, combining the players and their network relationships, to reconstruct the open ecosystem of the Internet.
    After showing that traditional theories in competitive strategy are invalid in Web 2.0 era, this study contextually discussed and organized the dynamic strategic interactions in open development, which expanded hypercompetition theory into its fifth arena, the open arena theory. The core ideas and consequences of the dynamic strategic interactions are as follows: (1) user generated content to shift the control; (2) content mashups to break the web strongholds; (3) open API to unleash the chains of innovation; (4) open platform to recruit third party developers; (5) open social data to absorb small and middle websites; (6) data portability to tear down all the walls. The end of open arena is supposed to be a status that all services, technologies, contents, and data are completely open to all. Businesses in open arena pursue openness to gain competitive advantages, while prevent total openness where no one has any competitive advantage.
    According to the study, since the inertia of the monopolistic incumbent, the Internet industry in Taiwan has not currently entered into the open arena. Lacking the experience of dynamic strategic interaction in open arena, it is generally difficult for businesses in Taiwan to tap into the global market, and thus limited to the local market.
    圖目錄 vii
    表目錄 ix
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 2
    第二節 研究目的與問題 4
    第三節 研究途徑與方法 5
    第四節 研究架構 7
    第五節 研究範圍 8
    第六節 研究限制 8
    第二章 文獻探討 11
    第一節 Web 2.0的意涵 12
    第二節 策略管理理論 23
    第三節 新經濟理論 30
    第四節 超競爭理論 42
    第五節 開放策略 48
    第三章 開放策略分析模型 53
    第一節 開放發展 54
    第二節 開放生態系 60
    第三節 開放策略分析工具 66
    第四節 開放競技場 68
    第四章 個案研究 77
    第一節 重量級拳賽 78
    第二節 昨日的帝國 82
    第三節 群聚之異數 88
    第四節 邊陲地帶 91
    第五章 結論與建議 97
    第一節 研究發現 97
    第二節 研究貢獻 99
    第三節 研究建議 100
    參考文獻 103
    Reference: 中文部份
    Kevin(2008年12月22日),[ARO觀察]台灣網路地圖服務發展現況,http://blog.insightxplorer.com/2008/12/22/aro觀察台灣網路地圖服務發展現況/(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    伟剑(2005年11月22日),什么是Web 2.0,互联网周刊。
    林伯峰(2007),Web 2.0之創新應用服務與經營模式之研究,國立中山大學。
    林佑錚(2006年12月13日),[觀點] 高度善用網路者,http://kent.ppolis.com/?p=92(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    林宏達(2006年7月10日),破壞王來了!一個敢秀自己的年代,小螞蟻也可以扳倒大企業,商業週刊,88-96。
    江旻峻(2007),Web 2.0時代網路發展策略—從整合性關係建立網站之觀點出發,臺灣大學。
    江芳儀(2007),網站內容由使用者提供的 Web 2.0網站之價值共創與創新事業模式研究,國立政治大學。
    吳啟彰(2008),Web 2.0時代的經營模式探討與行銷策略分析,國立交通大學。
    吳思華(1993),策略管理的內涵與教學,第五屆中華民國管理教育研討會。
    吳思華(1997),資源與網路:高科技產業的策略邏輯,世界經理文摘(124),48-60。
    吳思華(2000),策略九說,台北:臉譜。
    莊友欣(2000年7月25日),e觸即發:掌握電子商務8大優勢,http://charlesc.ilovemeow.net/blog/20000725/25(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    連邦國際專利商標事務所(2007),美國准許商業方法及信號專利新判例,連邦智權新知,1-2。
    連邦國際專利商標事務所(2008),美國專利司法審判四大動向,連邦智權新知,1-4。
    陳品均(2006),Web 2.0應用服務策略行動之研究-以Yahoo!、Google、MSN為例,臺灣大學。
    陳松筠(2006年7月15日),我們就是網路,數位時代,108-113。
    陳瑩芳(2007),Web 2.0時代超優勢競爭模式之初探—以雅虎奇摩與無名小站為例,國立臺灣科技大學。
    高珮芳(2004),線上音樂商店系統架構之競爭分析,國立政治大學。
    程耀輝(1994),跨海峽企業生態系中的共同演化與制度同形,國立政治大學。
    馮震宇(2007),掌握Web 2.0趨勢創造價值,能力雜誌,22-33。
    黃國書(2008),Web 2.0之網路平台資訊分析—以Social Network Service為例,臺灣大學。
    黃子豪(2007),Web 2.0經營模式與顧客關係之探討,國立臺灣科技大學。
    黃紹麟(2006),中國網際網路大預言(七)Web 2.0經濟體,數位之牆, http://www.digitalwall.com/scripts/display.asp?UID=331(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    黃紹麟(2008),開放,將我們帶向何方,數位之牆,http://www.digitalwall.com/scripts/display.asp?UID=435。
    趙怡、褚瑞婷(2007),數位匯流時代的傳播政策,財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
    新世代網路創新服務發展個案集(2008),經濟部技術處。
    新世代網路裝置發展協會(2009),Device 2.0,http://www.device20.org/(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    楊孝先(2007),Web 2.0的趨勢與機會,簡報,行雲會。
    廖淑婷、周文卿(2007),從 Web 2.0趨勢看網路大廠經營模式研究,台北市:資策會資訊市場情報中心。
    劉威麟(2007),Sweet Spot: 一夕爆紅網路效應,台北市:寶瓶文化。
    謝清俊(1999),佛教資料電子化的意義,佛教圖書館館訊(18)。
    盧文祥(2005),從創新觀點檢視創作共享機制與著作權保護及知識分享擴散之關係,國立政治大學。
    盧希鵬(2005),電子商務—產業架構、經營模式與電子化策略,台北:雙葉書廊。
    盧澤宇、Ivy(2006年5月25日),什麼是Web 2.0,Intelligent Times。
    曠文溱(2009年6月19日),分析:軟體市集在台灣行得通嗎?,ZDNet Taiwan,http://www.zdnet.com.tw/news/comm/0,2000085675,20139053,00.htm(擷取日期:2009年7月12日)。
    龔仁文、簡西村、洪毓祥、蘇偉仁、陳正益、戴家祥等(2007),Web 2.0網路上有錢 創意在裡面,台北市:資策會。
    龔仁文、蘇偉仁、洪鑫泓、王文宏、黃宣龍、蔡家玲等(2007),Web 2.0創新應用案例集:科技化服務新趨勢,台北市:資策會。

    英文部份
    Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32–44.
    Anderson, C. (2004, October). The Long Tail. Wired.
    Anderson, C. (2006). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More: Hyperion.
    Anderson, C. (2008, June 27). Excellent HBR piece challenging the Long Tail. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/06/excellent-hbr-p.html.
    Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for
    education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
    Arrington, M. (2009, May 21). Source: Google Values MySpace Deal At $75 Million/Year Or Less. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/21/source-google-values-myspace-deal-at-75-millionyear-or-less/.
    Arthur, C. (2006). What is the 1% rule? The Guardian. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jul/20/guardianweeklytechnologysection2
    Bryan, L. (2008). Enduring Ideas: The McKinsey 7-S framework. McKinseyQuarterly.
    Burcher, N. (2009, March 24). Twitter demographics and usage statistics - data from Compete, Hitwise, Quantcast, Nielsen and Twitterholic.
    Catone, J. (2008). How We Tweet: The Definitive List of the Top Twitter Clients.
    Chaplin, W. (1999). Web surfers are fickle. The Jedi Master Speaks. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.dreamagic.com/jedi/article9.html
    Cuene, J. (2005). Web1.0 vs. Web 2.0. Paper presented at the MiMA. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://httpcuene.typepad.com/blog/05/web_20_at_mima.html
    D'aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Free Press.
    Don Tapscott, A. D. W. (2008). Wikinomics: Portfolio Hardcover.
    Elberse, A. (2008). Should You Invest in the Long Tail? Harvard Business Review.
    Eldon, E. (2009, April 15). Facebook rejects funding at $4 billion valuation, may not raise more. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/facebook-rejects-funding-at-4-billion-valuation-may-not-raise-more/.
    Finkle, J. (2009, May 15). Hackers Launch New Facebook Attack. AOL Money & Finance. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://money.aol.com/article/hackers-launch-new-attack-on-facebook/484688.
    Forret, P. (2005, September 29). Web 2.0mememap overview. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://blog.forret.com/2005/09/web-20-mememap-overview/.
    Foster, P. (2008, Dec 22). Long Tail theory contradicted as study reveals 10m digital music tracks unsold
    Frank, R. H. (2007). The Economic Naturalist: Basic Books.
    French, A. L. (2009, May 8). Facebook terms of service compared with MySpace, Flickr, Picasa, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Twitter.
    Giles, J. (2005). Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(900-901).
    Google signs $900m News Corp deal (2006, August 7). BBC News. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/5254642.stm.
    Gordhamer, S. (2009). How Twitter is Dethroning the Old Guard.
    Graham, P. (2005). Web 2.0. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html
    Grindley, P. (1995). Standards, Strategy, anf Policy: Cases and Stories. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Grossman, L. (2006, December 13). Time's Person of the Year: You. Time.
    Hinchcliffe, D. (2005, September 24). The Web 2.0Is Here. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://web2.wsj2.com/web2ishere.htm.
    Hinchcliffe, D. (2007, October). Visualizing Web 2.0. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://web2.wsj2.com/visualizingweb20.htm.
    Hippel, E. V. (2006). Democratizing Innovation: The MIT Press.
    Hu, J., & Olsen, S. (2004, February 17). Yahoo dumps Google search technology. CNET News. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://news.cnet.com/2100-1024_3-5160710.html.
    Jackson, D. (2005, March 15). Competition and The Long Tail, Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://seekingalpha.com/article/1175-competition-and-the-long-tail
    Jarvis, J. (2009, March 10). APIs: The new distribution. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/03/10/apis-the-new-distribution/.
    Johnson, S. (2009, June 5). How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live. Time.
    Kafka, P. (2008, Feb 1). Google: MySpace Deal Hurting Us. The Business Insider. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/2/google-myspace-deal-hurting-us-nws.
    Kelly, K. (2005). We Are the Web. Wired, (13.08), 5. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/tech.html?pg=5
    Kraemer, B. (2008, November 19). The Story Of Yahoo's Decline. ChannelWeb. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.crn.com/it-channel/212100900;jsessionid=PTADG3DMI3TGYQSNDLPSKHSCJUNN2JVN?pgno=2.
    Landry, J. T. (2007). Reviews. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 34.
    Mayfield, R. (2006, April 27). Power Law of Participation. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://ross.typepad.com/blog/2006/04/power_law_of_pa.html.
    McAlister, M. (Producer). (2009, April) The Open Strategy. Guardian News & Media.
    Miller, C. C. (2009, April 18, 2009). Venture Capital Investment Sinks. The New York Times.
    Moresco, J. (2008, March 18). Facebook Grabs $300M, But Has Web 2.0Reached its Peak? RedHerring.
    Musser, J., & O'Reilly, T. (2006). Web 2.0Principles and Best Practices.
    Nicole, K. (2008, June 15, 2009). Facebook Blocks Google’s Friend Connect. There Goes the Open Web. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://mashable.com/2008/05/15/facebook-blocks-friend-connec/.
    Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1993). From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65-77.
    O'reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, 30, 2005.
    Orlowski, A. (2008, November 7). Chopping the Long Tail down to size, Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/07/long_tail_debunked/
    Osterwalder, A. (2005, November 05). What is a business model?. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://business-model-design.blogspot.com/2005/11/what-is-business-model.html.
    Ostrow, A. (2008, June 18, 2009). Facebook’s Translation Application Now Available to Developers. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://mashable.com/2008/07/23/facebook-translations-for-developers/.
    Parr, B. (2009, May 31). The Top 6 Game-Changing Features of Google Wave. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/google-wave-features/.
    Perez, J. C. (2007, August 29). Facebook cracks down on developer spam. The Washington Post. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/29/AR2007082900041_pf.html.
    Perez, S. (2009, April 21). Open Thread: Is Web 2.0Dead? Answer to Win Our Web 2.0Swag. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/open_thread_is_web_20_dead_answer_to_win_our_web_20_swag.php.
    Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1988). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from Americas Best Run Companies Grand Central Publishing.
    Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
    Protalinski, E. (2009, March 30). Microsoft to kill Encarta later this year. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/03/microsoft-to-kill-encarta-later-this-year.ars.
    Recordon, D. (2008, May 9). MySpace's Data Availability is not Data Portability.
    Riley, D. (2008, January 8). Facebook, Google And Plaxo Join The DataPortability Workgroup. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/this-day-will-be-remembered-facebook-google-and-plaxo-join-the-dataportability-workgroup/.
    Schonfeld, E. (2009, June 10). The More Followers You Have, The More You Tweet. Or Is It The Other Way Around?
    Schroeder, S. (2008, December 5). Facebook Connect vs Google Friend Connect: Fight!. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://mashable.com/2008/12/05/facebook-connect-vs-google-friend-connect/.
    Scoble, R. (2008, June 15 2009). Facebook disabled my account.
    Shannon, V. (2006, June 26). A 'more revolutionary' Web. International Herald Tribune.
    Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy: Harvard Business Press.
    Sperry, M. (2008). What's A #Hashtag?. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://advocatesstudio.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/whats-a-hashtag/.
    Stone, B., & Helft, M. (2009, April 26). In Developing Countries, Web Grows Without Profit.
    Sutter, J. D. (2009, April 15). Ashton Kutcher challenges CNN to Twitter popularity contest. CNN.com. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/04/15/ashton.cnn.twitter.battle/.
    Swartz, A. (2006, September 4). Who Writes Wikipedia?. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia.
    Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: Portfolio Hardcover.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    智慧財產研究所
    92361008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923610081
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML404View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback