English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88645/118187 (75%)
Visitors : 23499281      Online Users : 67
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/90179
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90179


    Title: 不同訊息的目標設定對內在動機的影響
    Authors: 林文蘭
    Contributors: 陳彰儀
    林文蘭
    Date: 1989
    1988
    Issue Date: 2016-05-03 14:17:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    認知評價理論(cognitive evaluation theory)認為個人行為的自我控制感以及能力感會影響內在動機。本研究的目的即是探討在相同目標下不同的目標訊息(能力訊息與控制訊息)會如何影響個體的內在動機。
    本研究採用實驗法,研究的樣本是政治大學學生99名,受試被隨機分派到三個實驗組(這三組受試需完成的目標相同,但是他們得到的目標訊息不同,分別為無其它訊息、能力訊息與控制訊息)和一個控制組(沒有設定目標),實驗作業為七巧板拼圖,每一位受試皆做作業15分鐘,然後測量其內在動機,內在動機的指標有三個:態度測量(受試對作業的興趣以及喜好程度)和行為測量(實驗結束後的休息期間,受試繼續做作業的時間)。
    實驗結果採用二因子變異數及Dunn的事前考驗分析,分析時每一個實驗組又區分為達到目標和未達到目標兩組,然後進行一些統計檢驗。結果顯示:(1)控制訊息組受試,不論目標達到與否,其內在動機均較控制組受試低(2)無其它訊息組與能力訊息組受試,不論達到目標與否,其內在動機均與控制組受試無差異。最後本研究以認知評價理論把結果加以討論。
    Reference: 參考書目
    林清山(民65)心理與教育統計學。台北:東華出版社。
    裘友善(民75)目標難度對工作表現的影響。師範大學教研所博士論文。
    陳淑娟(民76 )過度辨正效果之研究- -酬賞種類、酬賞方式與認知發展階段對內在動機的影響。政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    Amabile, T. M., Dejong, W., &Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92-98.
    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
    Deci, E. L. (1972a). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113-120.
    Deci, E. L. (1972b). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior And Human Performance, 8, 217-229.
    Deci, E. L. (1975). Notes on the theory and metatheory of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 130-145.
    Eirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design (2nd ed) Monterey, California 93940: Brooks/coal
    Publishing Company.
    Enzie, M. E., &Ross, J. M. (1978). Increasing and decreasing interest with contingent rewards: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 588-597.
    Eres, M., &Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69-78.
    Garland, H. (1982). Goal levels and task performance: a compelling replication of some compelling results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 245-248.
    Hirst, M.K. (1988). Intrinsic motivation as influenced by task interdependence and goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 96-101.
    Latham, G. P., &Erez, M., &Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolutioning scientific disputes by the joint desing of crucial experiments by the antagonists : application to the Erez-Latham disputs regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology (monograph).
    Latham, G. P., &Yuki, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 824-845.
    Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
    Locke, E. A. (1982). Relation of goal performance with a short work period multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 512-514.
    Locke, E. A., Saari, M. L., Shaw, K. N., &Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
    Maderlink, G., &Harackiewiez, J. M. (1984). Proximal versus distal goal setting and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 918-928.
    Mento, J. A., Steel, P. R., &Karren, J. R. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance : 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.
    Mossholder, K. W. (1980). Effects of externally mediated goal setting on intrinsic motivation: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 202 - 210 .
    Phillips, J.S., &Freedman, S. M. (1988). The task related competency and compliance aspects of goal setting: a clarification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 34-49 .
    Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in intrapersonal sphere: an extention of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
    Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., &Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.
    Rosnfield, D., Folger, R., &Adelman, H. F. (1980). When rewards reflect competence : a qualification of over-justication effect. Journal of Personality and Social Pshcology, 39, 368-276.
    Shally, E. C., & Oldham, G. R. (1985). Effects of goal difficulty and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation: a laboratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 628-640.
    Shalley, E. C., Oldham, R. G., &Porac, F. J. (1987). Effects of goal difficulty, goal-setting method, and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 553-563.
    Steers, R. M., &Porter, L. W. (1974). The role of task goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 434-452.
    Tubbs, M. E. (1986). Goal setting: a meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 474-483.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005531
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML174View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback