English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88657/118248 (75%)
Visitors : 23503864      Online Users : 185
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81783


    Title: Learning American Patent Law Through Court Decision Analysis
    Other Titles: 以判決分析方式來學習美國專利法
    Authors: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2016-03-02 16:46:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文提供非受美國訓練的法律學生一種閱讀美國專利法判決的方法,特別針對臺灣學生所設計。美國法律寫作有其風格。如果沒有在美國法學院受過訓練,讀者很難完全掌握判決的內容。因此,有必要提出一個方法以幫助學生分析判決,而使他們能獲得美國專利法的知識。為展現本文所建議的方法,本文先介紹美國法律寫作和美國專利法等概念。接著,就閱讀策略,本文以五個方向討論並舉例佐證。本文所提的方法包括三個步驟。首先,以初步分析各段落第一個句子的方式來重新組織法院判決;其次,確認各段落的主題是關於事實、法律原則、或法律爭點分析;最後,總結法院所適用之法律原則與裁決內容。因為法院判決有特定的文章結構,確認法院所採用的法律原則並非難事,而法律適用時所採用的相關事實內容也能確認。這些相關資訊可做為讀者用來提供法律意見之用。
    This article provides a method for non-American-trained law students to analyze American patent law cases. Particularly, the method is designed for Taiwanese students. The American legal writing has its own style. Without being trained in an American law school, a person cannot analyze the cases comprehensively. It is necessary to develop a method to help local students to analyze cases, so they can acquire the knowledge of American patent law. For elaborating the proposed method, this article begins with a background introduction about American legal writing and patent law. Then, five aspects of the proposed method are explained in details with examples. In the conclusion, a brief summary of the proposed method is provided. First, re-organize the court decision by briefly analyzing the first sentence of each paragraph. Second, identify whether a paragraph is about facts, legal doctrines, or legal issue analyses. Third, summarize the legal rules applied and rulings made. Because of the formality of the legal writing tradition in American, it is not difficult to identify the law applied by the court, and that the relevant facts supporting the rulings in a decision can also be identified, so that those facts in that decision could be useful for supplying a legal opinion under the facts provided by a client.
    Relation: 人文社會科學研究, 9(2), 20-36
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6284%2fNPUSTHSSR.2015.9(2)2
    DOI: 10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2015.9(2)2
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    407989.pdf556KbAdobe PDF449View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback