English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23494657      Online Users : 80
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 廣告學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/80249
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80249


    Title: Facebook與Instagram之跨訊息綜效比較
    A comparison of cross-message synergy effect between Facebook and Instagram
    Authors: 陳又瑈
    Chen, Yu Jou
    Contributors: 張郁敏
    Chang, Yu Min
    陳又瑈
    Chen, Yu Jou
    Keywords: 社群APP
    Facebook
    Instagram
    跨訊息綜效
    貼文廣告
    美感反應
    操弄意圖推論
    訊息涉入度
    Social Application
    Facebook
    Instagram
    Cross-message Synergy
    Page Post Ad
    Aesthetic Response
    Inferences of Manipulative Intent
    Message Involvement
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-04 16:47:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   數位行動浪潮襲捲全球,智慧型手機的普及讓行動行銷成為一股趨勢,如何善用行動媒體的特性來提高整合行銷傳播的綜效亦是近年來數位行銷領域相當關注的話題。APP是行動媒體中最能直接與消費者接觸的工具,而社群APP因為內容具備即時性、社群性等特徵,成為各大品牌搶奪消費者眼球的必爭之地。
      在眾多社群APP中,Facebook的廣告服務已行之有年,後起之秀Instagram亦於2015年9月對台灣企業開放廣告功能,讓廣告主能以付費的方式觸及更多的使用者。此二平台的廣告運作機制非常相似,消費者都會先接收貼文廣告,再從貼文廣告連接到品牌帳號的主要頁面,兩個品牌訊息加總將有機會產生跨訊息綜效。不過,這兩個平台在內容表現形式上卻不盡相同,且Instagram強大的濾鏡功能能讓照片更具美感,進而影響使用者對品牌的解讀及反應,所呈現的綜效也可能有所不同。
      因此本研究選定Facebook與Instagram為研究對象,以社群APP平台為自變項,廣告態度及品牌態度為依變項,來驗證跨訊息綜效是否產生,並比較此二平台在廣告資訊處理歷程及效果上的差異。本研究採用實驗法,招募100名政治大學非傳播學院之大學生及研究生進行實驗,所得結果如下:
    一、 單一媒體的跨訊息綜效並不顯著,但不同媒體(Facebook與Instagram)的資訊處理歷程、態度形成及跨訊息效果卻不盡相同。
    二、 與說服知識相比,美感反應才是影響操弄意圖推論高低的主要變項,接收Facebook廣告的消費者會因為較低美感反應產生較高操弄意圖推論,接收Instagram廣告的消費者則會因為美感反應較高而使操弄意圖推論較低。
    三、 操弄意圖推論對訊息涉入度具顯著負向影響,操弄意圖愈高,訊息涉入度愈低,反之亦然。Facebook的操弄意圖推論較高,因此訊息涉入度較低,消費者較缺乏訊息處理動機,而Instagram的操弄意圖推論較低使得訊息涉入度較高,亦即消費者具備較高的訊息處理動機。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    白明勝(1995)。〈投入程度、認知需求對廣告說服效果之影響—ELM模式之實證研究〉。國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
    范勻瑄(2006)。〈從個人差異看商品設計美感的效果—以消費者商品美感中心性 (CVPA)為例〉。國立政治大學廣告學系碩士論文。
    高慈薏(2012)。〈消費者參與社群媒體環境中之價值協作行為研究〉,《商學學報》,(20),119-144。
    劉美琪、許安琪、漆梅君、于心如(2000)。《當代廣告:概念與操作》。台北:學富文化。
    英文文獻
    Abbott, W., Donaghey, J., Hare, J., & Hopkins, P. (2013). An Instagram is worth a thousand words: an industry panel and audience Q&A. Library Hi Tech News, 7, 1-6.
    Assael, H. (2011). From Silos to Synergy: A fifty-year review of cross-media research shows synergy has yet to achieve its full potential. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 1-17.
    Baker, M. J., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14,538-555.
    Bamossy, G., Scammon, D. L., & Johnston, M. (1983). A preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of an aesthetic judgment test. Advances in consumer research, 10(1), 685-690.
    Beltramini, R. F. (1982). Advertising perceived believability scale. In D. R. Corrigan, F. B. Kraft & R. H. Ross (ed.), Proceedings of the Southwestern Marketing Association. Wichita State University, KS: 1-3.
    Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29.
    Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of consumer research, 29(4), 551-565.
    Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of consumer research, 21, 165-175.
    Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225-254.
    Chapman, L. H. (2001). Can the arts win hearts and minds? Arts Education Policy Review, 102(5), 21-23.
    Chen, H. C., Reardon, R., Rea, C., & Moore, D. J. (1992). Forewarning of content and involvement: Consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(6), 523-541.
    Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1992). Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: In Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Curran, K., Graham, S., & Temple, C. (2011). Advertising on Facebook. International Journal of E-business development, 1(1), 26-33.
    Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 36(4), 424-435.
    Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W., Kirmani, A., & Smit, E. G. (2015). A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 6-16.
    Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of consumer research, 21, 1-31.
    Garretson, J. A., & Niedrich, R. W. (2004). Spokes-characters: Creating character trust and positive brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 25-36.
    Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Hermeren, G. (1988). The nature of aesthetic qualities. Lund: Lund University Press.
    Hirschman, E. C. (1986). The effect of verbal and pictorial advertising stimuli on aesthetic, utilitarian and familiarity perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 27-34.
    Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnell, V. (1999). Propaganda and persuasion. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Kim, J., Yoon, H. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2010). Integrating advertising and publicity. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 97-113.
    Labella, C., & Koehler, D. J. (2004). Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence. Memory & cognition, 32(7), 1076-1089.
    Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British journal of psychology, 95(4), 489-508.
    Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework (pp. 45-63). Hillsdale, New Jerzy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 53, 48-65.
    Madden, T. J., Allen, C. T., & Twible, J. L. (1988). Attitude toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices under Different Processing sets. Journal of marketing research, 25(Aug), 242-252.
    McAllister, M. P. (1996). The commercialization of American culture: New advertising, control, and democracy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Moriarty, S. E. (1994). PR and IMC: The benefits of integration. Public Relations Quarterly, 39 (3), 38–45.
    Naik, P. A., & Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (4), 375–388.
    Navarro-Bailon, M. A. (2012). Strategic consistent messages in cross-tool campaigns: Effects on brand image and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(3), 189-202.
    Petroshius, S. M., & Crocker, K. E. (1989). An empirical analysis of spokesperson characteristics on advertisement and product evaluations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 847-855.
    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co.
    Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, (10)2, 135-146.
    Petty, R., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Psychology Press.
    Schultz, D. E. (1996). The inevitability of integrated communications. Journal of Business Research, 37(3), 139-146.
    Schultz, D. E., & Kitchen, P. J. (1997). Integrated marketing communications in US advertising agencies: An exploratory study. Journal of Advertising Research, 37(5), 7-18.
    Schwartz, R., & Halegoua, R. H. (2014). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society, 1–18.
    Simonson, A., & Schmitt, B. H. (1997). Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image. New York: Free Press.
    Van Noort, G., Antheunis, M. L., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 39-53.
    Voorveld, H. A., & van Noort, G. (2014). Social media in advertising campaigns: Examining the effects on perceived persuasive intent, campaign and brand responses. Journal of Creative Communications, 9(3), 253-268.
    Wanger, J. (1999). “Aesthetic value: beauty in art and fashion,” in Morris B. H. (eds) Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research, Routledge, New York, 126-146.
    Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220.
    Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1981). Stages in the analysis of persuasive messages: The role of causal attributions and message comprehension. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 40(2), 246-259.
    Yamamoto, M., & Lambert, D. R. (1994). The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(4), 309-324.
    Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
    Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 13(4), 59-70.
    網路資料
    BQJ智商謀略(2013)。〈調查:News feed植入式廣告成新寵〉。上網日期:2014年10月16日,取自http://www.bqjournal.com/survey-news-feed-cloned-into-advertising-sandoval
    EOLembrain東方快線網絡市調(2012)。〈品牌鞋款,誰獨領風潮?〉。上網日期:2015年6月11日,取自http://www.eolembrain.com/Latest_View.aspx?SelectID=287
    Facebook(2014)。〈Facebook廣告指南〉。上網日期:2014年10月23日,取自https://www.facebook.com/business/ads-guide/
    Pollster波仕特線上市調網(2014)。〈最常購買的運動鞋品牌,Nike排名第一〉。上網日期:2015年6月11日,取自http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=2395
    財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2015)。〈「台灣無線網路使用調查」結果公布 熟齡上網正夯 行動連網民眾滿意〉。上網日期:2015年3月12日,取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20150202a.pdf
    財團法人資訊工業策進會(2014)。〈首創!資策會跨通路分析使用者行為 評選「2014年上半年臺灣風雲APP百強」〉。上網日期:2014年10月16日,取自http://www.iii.org.tw/service/3_1_1_c.aspx?id=1356
    財團法人資訊工業策進會FIND(2014)。〈智慧型行動裝置普及率近7成 市場即將飽和! 資策會FIND:行動族群半年增加逾100萬人、全臺滑世代破1,432萬〉。上網日期:2015年3月12日,取自http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=8303#
    動腦(2013)。〈【數位】你用對Facebook廣告了嗎?〉。上網日期:2014年10月23日,取自http://www.brain.com.tw/news/newscontent.aspx?ID=19277
    創市際市場研究顧問(2013)。〈創市際月刊報告書〉。上網日期:2014年10月16日,取自https://zh.scribd.com/doc/157178884/InsightXplorer-Monthly-Report-201307
    BrightEdge (2011). BrightEdge November 2011 SocialShare Report. Retrieved October 16, 2014, from http://www.brightedge.com/2011-11-16-BrightEdge-November-SocialShare
    TOTRMS (2014). Instagram Statistics. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from http://totems.co/instagram-statistics/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣告學系
    102452004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024520041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[廣告學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    004101.pdf7091KbAdobe PDF1174View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback