English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23483556      Online Users : 157
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/72072


    Title: 電信民營化與自由化之衝突與調和─兩岸比較參鑒
    Other Titles: The Conflict between Telecom Privatization and Liberalization and Its Mitgation – A Cross-Strait Comparative Study
    Authors: 劉孔中
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: 民營化;電信自由化;管制;功能分離;用戶回路;通訊
    Privatization;Telecom Liberalization;Regulation;Functional Separation;User Loop;Communications and Broadcast Law
    Date: 2013-06
    Issue Date: 2014-12-15 18:05:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 民營化與自由化改革關係密切,亦存在張力與衝突。我國臺灣地區民營化後的中華電信僅短暫經歷移動通訊市場龍頭地位不保的局面,旋即憑藉剩餘獨佔市場地位,搭配網路效益,以及民營化後的靈活行銷手法,屢屢限制市場競爭,使得所有其他新進業者都仰賴其移動與固定網路,消費者權益未獲應有保障,與電信自由化政策目標相去甚遠。中國大陸電信業改革實踐中也同樣遭遇超高定價攫取超額利潤,嚴重損害消費者利益和寬頻低效掣肘產業發展無法釋放帶動效應等問題。兩岸比較下,後民營化時代我國臺灣地區應從行業管制和公司治理兩個層面進行革新:前者包括制度面盡速開放用戶回路,執法面強化管制與加強協調;後者包括變更持股機關、強化董事會功能、明定中華電信政策任務。而中國大陸民營化和自由化審慎緩進過程中則宜記取民營化與自由化不可混為一談,徹底民營化與自由化並無必然關聯,批發部門功能分離應作為三大電信公司治理的基本原則,並盡速制定頒行富有前瞻性和回應三網融合的《通訊傳播法》。
    Privatization reform and liberalization reform are not only closely related but also conflictive. Just a short period of losing mobile communications market leading position after privatization reform in Taiwan, HiNet soon restricts competition in the market by remaining exclusive market position, networks benefits and flexible marketing practices, leading to all other new entrants relying on its mobile and fixed networks, the interests of consumers out of full protection, which are very different from telecom liberalization policy objectives. Telecommunications industry reform in mainland China also suffers high pricing grab excess profits, seriously harming the interests of consumers and inefficient broadband constraining industrial development and its’ driving effect. Comparatively, Taiwan should innovate industry regulation and corporate governance in post-privatization era. The former includes the establishment of user loop openness system and the strengtheness of regulation and coordination enforcement; the latter includes changing holdings authorities, strengthening the functions of the Board stipulates specifying HiNet policy tasks. During the process of privatization and liberalization reform, mainland China should learn lessons that privatization and liberalization should not be confused, thorough privatization and liberalization are not necessarily associated, functional separation should be taken as the basic governance principle of telecommunication company. Mainland China also should issue forward-looking and responsive Communications and Broadcast Law as soon as possible.
    Relation: 經濟法論叢, 24, 185-207
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML682View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback