English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23475046      Online Users : 288
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70486


    Title: 兩岸專利代理機構營運及績效比較-以將群、三友及三環為例
    Other Titles: A Comparison between Taiwan and Across The Strait Patent Prosecution Business Models and Effects
    Authors: 樊治齊;黃上上;翁千惠;李容嘉
    Fan, Chih-Chi;Chien-Hui Weng
    Contributors: 智財所
    Keywords: 將群;三友;三環;專利代理機構;專利申請
    JC IP group;LLC.;Beijing sanyou intellectual property agency Ltd.;Scihead patent agent CO.;Ltd.;Patent agency;Patent prosecution
    Date: 2008.04
    Issue Date: 2014-10-06 17:22:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著中國政治經濟地位的提升,中國專利的價值隨著水漲船高,龐大的專利申請市場,使中國專利代理機構如雨後春筍般蓬勃發展。對台灣而言,台灣廠商在選擇專利代理機構時,由於兩岸之間無語言障礙,等於有更多供應商可供選擇,除了委託大陸專利代理機構申請大陸專利之外,甚至將台灣專利的申請業務亦委託其代為撰寫。台灣的專利代理機構,在面對大陸專利代理機構來勢洶洶的挑戰,應如何因應?本文擬透過經營管理構面的分析,以台灣將群、北京三友、及廣州三環為例,透過專利產量、獲證比率、目標客群與人力結構等指標,探討專利代理機構在營運管理之績效。期讓台灣對於中國專利代理產業有更深入的瞭解,以利進行相關決策。
    China patents are becoming more and more valuable due to the accelerated development of its economy, therewith creating a blossoming patent agency system to satisfy the market demand. Contrary, Taiwan companies have, due to the language vantage point, alternatives in choosing a patent agency to file patents in either Taiwan or China; the choice can either be a local patent agency or a Chinese patent agency across the strait. Due to this penetration of the Chinese patent agencies into the Taiwan patent prosecution system, the local market share in patent prosecution has been precipitating. What should Taiwan patent agencies do to counteract these challenging circumstances under an enterprising Chinese patent agency? Based on an analysis of the operating ambit amongst the JC IP Group, LLC., Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd., Scihead Patent Agent CO., Ltd, by using “patent filing volume”, ”patent approval rate”, ”target client” and ”human resources” as a criteria to grade running performances. We, herewith, provide an advanced and extensive analogy of the Chinese patent agent industry to enable Taiwanese patent agencies to strategize.
    Relation: 政大智慧財產評論, 6(1), 1-43
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文
    [智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-43.pdf1378KbAdobe PDF2821View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback