English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88866/118573 (75%)
Visitors : 23557894      Online Users : 264
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68338


    Title: 中國大陸立法聽證制度之研究(2/2)
    Other Titles: A Study on the Legislative Hearing in Mainland China (II)
    Authors: 趙建民;張淳翔
    Contributors: 國家發展研究所
    Keywords: 中國大陸立法;聽證制度;意見匯集;社會主義立法;立法聽證的功效動員式立法;有限參與的意見匯集
    Mainland China’s legislative hearing;opinion-articulation;legislativetransparency legislation under “socialist democracy”;mobilized legislation limited participatory system.
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 16:54:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國大陸於九0 年代中期,將聽證制度引入行政決策及立法領域,此於決策之多元化及一般民眾之政治參與均有所影響,被認為是中國政治改革的最新進展。中國大陸立法為何於此時引進以前被譏為資本主義之聽證制度?此於其立法過程中之意見匯集有何衝擊?中國大陸聽證制度的概念與具體運用為何?中國大陸傳統立法過程中意見匯集有何不足?是否受到加入WTO 的影響?立法聽證的功效如果?進一步推廣有那些限制性因素?在「社會主義民主」概念下的聽證會有何特色?是否有助於公民政治效能感的提昇?對中國大陸未來的民主化有何影響?推動聽證制度的主要目的是增加決策的民主程度?還是增進統治的有效性?本研究係針對中國大陸立法制度,已自過去動員式,逐漸演進為有限參與的意見匯集,據此進行探討,並對目前仍處於試驗階段的立法聽證制度進行實地的訪談研究。在理論建構方面,藉助比較研究分析途徑,期對聽證制度的功能建立初步的評估,並藉以觀察中國大陸,在引進聽證制度後,立法透明度是否有所增加。
    Mainland China’s legislature started to practice the hearing system since themid-1990s. The new method would no doubt help to diversify the decision-making process and increase the participation by ordinary people in politics. It is deemed by some as the latest round in the tumultuous drive towards reforming its political system in the post-Cultural Revolution period. This study intends to answer the following questions: Why did China introduce the hearings into its legislative process? What are the intended purposes of this? Is there any impact on the process of opinion-articulation in legislation? What are the concepts and practice of the hearing in China? Would it help with the transparency of China’s opaque political process? What is wrong with the traditional opinion-articulation in China’s legislative process? Did the accession into the World Trade Organization bear any influence on the adoption of the new system? What might be the obstacles in order to promote the new system throughout the nation? What are the characteristics of legislative hearing under “socialist democracy”? Would legislative hearings help increase political efficacy? Or, would it simply serve as another tool in the consolidation of the communist rule? This study is conducted in the backdrop of a transition of China’s political system. It has been gradually shaped from that of a mobilized system to that of a limited participatory system. The writers intend to take a filed trip to the Southwest province of China, Sichuan, to observe in person the newly introduced system. It is hoped that a preliminary assessment on the new practice can be derived as a result.
    Relation: 行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC93-2414-H004-001
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[國家發展研究所] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93-2414-H-004-001.pdf149KbAdobe PDF450View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback