English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88668/118332 (75%)
Visitors : 23506587      Online Users : 278
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/64752


    Title: International applications of the agenda-setting Acapulco Typology
    Authors: 陳憶寧
    McCombs, Maxwell;Ghanem, Salma;Lennon, Federico Rey;Blood, R. Warwick;Chen, Yi-Ning (Katherine);Ban, Hyun
    Contributors: 廣告系
    Keywords: agenda-setting;issue salience;Acapulco typology;public opinion;news agenda
    Date: 2011.01
    Issue Date: 2014-03-20 16:57:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The Chapel Hill study is well known as both the theoretical and empirical origin of agenda-setting theory. To a considerable degree, however, this study conducted by McCombs and Shaw (1972) during the 1968 presidential election also set the methodological agenda for a significant proportion of the hundred of empirical studies that have followed. Although the Chapel Hill study design was not the the first mass communication research study to use content analysis and survey research in tandem, it was the study that brought this combination of research methods to center stage in investigating cognitive effects. Over time, a number of tactical variations have evolved in research practice for investigating these agenda-setting effects. A four part typology summarizing these perspectives is frequently referred to as the Acapulco typology because McCombs initially presented it in Acapulco, Mexico, at the invitation of International Communication Association president elect Everett Rogers. This chapters explores international applications of the Acapulco typology. The typology is defined by two dimensions. The first considers the focus of attention: a set of issues on the agenda; or a single item on the agenda. The second distinguishes two ways of measuring the salience of items on the agenda: either as aggregate measures describing an entire population; or measures that describe individual responses.
    Relation: Sourcebook for political communication research : methods, measures, and analytical techniques, Routledge, pp 383-394
    Data Type: book/chapter
    Appears in Collections:[廣告學系] 專書/專書篇章

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1205View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback