English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23476203      Online Users : 283
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59991


    Title: 台灣新藥研發公司多角化策略分析 -從知識管理程序觀點
    Diversification strategy analysis of new drug discovery company in Taiwan:the perspective of knowledge management process
    Authors: 江政倫
    Chiang, Cheng Lun
    Contributors: 陳桂恆
    吳豐祥

    Chen, Keith
    Wu, Feng Shang

    江政倫
    Chiang, Cheng Lun
    Keywords: 生技製藥
    研發
    多角化
    技術知識特質
    知識管理
    Biotechnology
    Pharmaceutical Industry
    Research and Development
    Diversification
    Characteristic of Technology
    Knowledge Attributes
    Knowledge Management
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-04 11:17:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 新藥研發是台灣生技發展的重點產業。新藥研發一般具有高投資、高風險與研發期長的特性。因此,有些公司會透過多角化的策略來分散風險。不過,在有限的資源與人力下,發展多角化的產品通常是個極具挑戰的任務。因此,本研究針對新藥研發公司,就其採取多角化的動機與策略來加以探討。
    此外,在知識經濟的時代,知識已成為企業最重要的資產,如何透過有效的知識管理以提昇組織知識的價值,則是企業所重視的關鍵性議題之一。新藥研發屬知識密集產業,知識管理對於公司相當重要。因此本研究亦從知識特性的觀點(路徑相依度、不確定程度與競爭衝擊程度)來探討其對知識管理的影響。
    本研究在方法上採取多重個案研究的方式,透過深入個案訪談與次級資料收集,所得到的結論如下:
    1. 台灣新藥研發公司選擇多角化策略的動機相當多元。
    2. 台灣新藥研發公司多角化的動機與多角化目標領域之路徑相依度有關。
    3. 台灣新藥研發公司多角化目標領域技術知識的路徑相依度與競爭衝擊程度會影響其技術知識吸收的方式。
    4. 台灣新藥研發公司多角化目標領域技術知識的路徑相依度會影響其組織設計、分工與人員式知識擴散的對象。
    5. 台灣新藥研發公司進行多角化產品研發時,其知識蓄積活動上傾向於採取「機械-整合式」的蓄積方式。
    New drug development industry is one of the key biotech development areas in Taiwan. The nature of new drug development involves high investment, high risk and long development time. As a result, some companies develop diversification as a strategy to reduce the risk. However, the scarcity of resource and manpower makes developing diversified products particularly challenging. This study would focus on why these companies choose diversification strategy and which strategies they develop.
    Knowledge management is very important for companies in research-intensive industry. This study would also explore how the companies practice knowledge management on its diversified projects. In addition, this study uses technological knowledge characteristics (path dependence, degree of uncertainty, and competitive position) to analyze the effect upon knowledge management process.
    In this study, multiple case study method to take the way through in-depth case interviews and secondary data collection, the conclusion is as follows:
    1.The reasons why new drug development companies in Taiwan underwent diversification vary a lot.
    2.Synergy motivation of new drug development companies in Taiwan will affect the path dependence of technological knowledge in target areas for diversification.
    3.Path dependence and competitive intensity of technological knowledge in target areas for diversification will affect the way of technical knowledge acquired in Taiwan’s new drug development companies.
    4.Path dependence of technological knowledge will affect the organizational design, the division of labor and object of personnel-type knowledge diffusion
    5.New drug development companies in Taiwan tend to choose 「Mechanical-Integrated」mode of knowledge Storage when the diversification activities.
    Reference: 一、英文文獻
    1.Aaker, D. A. (1984). Development Business Strategies. England: John Wiley and Sons.
    2.Amit, R., & Livnat, J. (1988). Diversification Strategies, Business Cycles and Economic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 99-110.
    3.Ansoff, H. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.
    4.Ansoff, H. I. (1965). The Firm of the Future. Harvard Business Review, 43(5), 162-178.
    5.Berry, C. H. (1975). Corporate Growth and Diversification. Journal of Law and Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    6.Bonora, E. A., & Revang, O. (1991). A Strategic Framework for Analyzing Professional Service Firm-developing Strategies for Sustained Performance. Strategic Management Society Inter-organizational Conference, Toronto, Canada.
    7.Booz, A. (1985). Hamilton.“Diversification: A Survey of European Chief Executives”. Booz, Allen and Hamilton. Inc. New York.
    8.Brajaraj, D. (1981). Choosing a Diversification Project in a Regulated Economy. Long Range Planning, 14(2), 78-86.
    9.Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise: Beard Books Inc.
    10.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1).
    11.Cusumano, M. A., & Selby, R. W. (1995). Microsoft Secrets: Free Press New York NY.
    12.Davenport, T., Prusak, L., Wills, G., Alani, H., Ashri, R., Crowder, R., Kalfoglou, Y. and Kim, S., (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    13.Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
    14.Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capital Society. New York: Haper Business.
    15.Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (1992). Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 468-505.
    16.Glueck, W. F., & Jauch, L. R. (1984). Strategic Management and Business Policy: McGraw-Hill New York.
    17.Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and Integration in American Industry. NBER Books.
    18.Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(10), 109-122.
    19.Hedlund, G. (1994). A Model of Knowledge Management and the N form Corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 73-90.
    20.Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1995). Competitiveness And Globalization. Strategic Management: West Publishing.
    21.Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
    22.Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264.
    23.Kamien, M., & Schwartz, N. (1975). Market Structure and Innovative Activity: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 1-37.
    24.Lal, R., & Sarvary, M. (1999). When and How is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition? Marketing Science, 18(4), 485-503.
    25.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA.
    26.Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis: Oxford University Press, USA.
    27.Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation. Research policy, 6(1), 36-76.
    28.Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    29.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York, 1, 995-995.
    30.Padmore, T., Schuetze, H., & Gibson, H. (1998). Modeling Systems of Innovation: An Enterprise-Centered View. Research Policy, 26(6), 605-624.
    31.Pitts, R. A., & Hopkins, H. D. (1982). Firm Diversity: Conceptualization and Measurement. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 620-629.
    32.Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Routledge London.
    33.Porter, M. (1990). The Comparative Advantage of Nations: New York: Free Press.
    34.Powell, W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Technological Change and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
    35.Ramanujam, V., & Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on Corporate Diversification: A Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523-551.
    36.Reed, R., & Luffman, G. A. (1986). Diversification: The Growing Confusion. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 29-35.
    37.Roussel, P. A., Saad, K. N., & Erickson, T. J. (1991). Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy: Harvard Business Press.
    38.Rumelt, R. (1974). Strategy, Structure and Performance. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
    39.Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies. Journal of financial Economics, 26(1), 3-27.
    40.Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1), 39-63.
    41.Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224.
    42.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
    43.Von Hippel, E.(1988). The Sources of Innovation (Vol. 132): Oxford University Press New York.
    44.Weggeman, M. (1997). Knowledge Management: Design and Control of Knowledge Intensive Organizations: Scriptum, Schiedam.
    45.Wheelwright, S. C., Clark, K. B., & School, H. B. (1992). Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development: Harvard Business School Publishing.
    46.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1(2), 3-3.
    47.Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
    48.Zand, D. E. (1981). Information, Organization, and Power: Effective Management in the Knowledge Society: McGraw-Hill New York.

    二、中文文獻
    1.司徒達賢 (1995),策略管理:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    2.吳思華 (1996),服務業中知識資源建構與維持策略之研究,第二屆服務業管理研究研討會。
    3.李仁芳 (1998),合作研發與國家創新系統:科技政策報導。
    4.李仁芳、花櫻芬 (1997),「技術知識類型與知識交流網路模型」,科技管理學刊, 第二卷(第一期),p75-121。
    5.李仁芳、張如蓮 (1997),高科技事業中創新類類型與組織知識創造之研究: 第二屆管理學術定性研究研討會。
    6.李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍 (1997),台灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究,科技管理學刊,第三卷(第一期),p37-80。
    7.林吟紋 (2007),企業多角化轉型過程中的知識管理之探討--以製造業為例。 國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    8.林榮華 (2002),如何評估新藥研發股。
    9.許月瑛 (1998),台灣精密機械業產品創新與組織知識流通之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。.
    10.陳振昌 (1994),台灣集團企業多角化策略與績效關聯之實證研究。 國立中興大學企管研究所碩士論文。
    11.陳啟祥 (2008) ,台灣生技產業發展趨勢與「生技新藥產業發展條例」影響:經濟部生物技術與醫藥工業發展推動小組。
    12.陳淑芳 (2009),台灣保健食品產業現況分析與趨勢。農業生技產業季刊第18期,p9-13。
    13.廖光將 (1996) ,台灣地區集團企業多角化策略與績效關係之研究:投資組合理論之應用。國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    14.謝慶龍 (2001),從PC 時代到IA 時代 日本半導體廠商之技術知識特質與知識管理作為之研究。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程科技管理組碩士論文。
    15.譚大純,劉廷揚,蔡明洲 (1995),知識管理文獻之回顧與分類. 1999年中華民國科技研討會論文集。
    16.基亞生物科技股份有限公司,九十九年年公開說明書。
    17.基亞生物科技股份有限公司,九十八年公開說明書。
    18.懷特生技新藥股份有限公司,九十八年公開說明書。
    19.基亞生物科技股份有限公司網站http://www.medigen.com.tw/ (2011/1/30)。
    20.懷特生技新藥股份有限公司網站http://www.phytohealth.com.tw/tc/index.php (2011/1/30)。
    21.2009年生技產業白皮書,經濟部工業局。
    22.2010年生計產業白皮書,經濟部工業局。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    96359035
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096359035
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    903501.pdf1949KbAdobe PDF573View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback