English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118693 (75%)
Visitors : 23570852      Online Users : 293
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49848
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49848


    Title: 結構性宰制:反反色情到反分級
    Structural domination: from anti-antipornography to anti-censorship
    Authors: 黃頌竹
    Contributors: 鄭光明
    黃頌竹
    Keywords: 兒童權利
    色情
    分級
    宰制
    言論自由
    女性主義
    麥金儂
    奧斯汀
    藍騰
    巴特勒
    言說行為
    性解放
    自由主義
    父權
    皮繩愉虐邦
    反對假分級制度聯盟
    Children's Right
    Pornography
    Rating
    Subordination
    Freedom of Speech
    Feminism
    C. MacKinnon
    J. L. Austin
    R. Langton
    J. Butler
    Performative
    Sex Liberation
    Liberalism
    Patriachy
    Taiwan BDSM Company
    Taiwan Anti-censorship Association
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-12-09 10:55:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 言論分級的辦法,特別是與性有關的言論分級,往往持著「保護未成年人」的立場落實於政策中。將這種對未成年人的言論限制手段,透過個人道德的論述,建構成一個對於未成年人之人格及人身安全的保護措施。然而在這個巧妙的論述之下,卻掩蓋不住底下騷動不已的權力角逐。
    回顧二十世紀八○年代的反色情女性主義論述,麥金儂直接指出「色情」的問題從來就不只是一個道德問題,而是關於政治、關於權力、關於社會結構的問題。事實是,種種對於未成年人可以接觸的資訊、言論施加之限制,也從來都不只是道德問題,而是(如女性主義者尖銳而正確的見解指出的)一個關於政治、權力、結構的問題。言論不只是意見,言論是具有能動性(agency)的。麥金儂表示言論對於社會現實的建構有著莫大的影響力,藍騰更使用奧斯汀的行動(performativity)理論來說明言論的能力。而巴特勒儘管在結論上反對反色情女性主義推動言論管制,卻也是基於肯定言論的行動力,對於言論管制往往剝奪傷害性言論的受害者在言說場域裡能夠自我賦權的機會,更透過公權力對此類言論與歧視結構的肯認,而有強化這個受害者結構的危機。
    我將從巴特勒對言論管制手段的批判,以及對於如何透過言說關係的再利用,來試圖顛覆既有的權力關係。現有的所謂「保護」未成年人之言論限制政策,其實一方面是鞏固成年人對未成年人之權力關係,另一方面也是將未成年人的教育視為成年人彼此爭奪權力的場域。我將論證言論的管制策略不僅無法達到「保護」的效果,更是對未成年人之主體性建立的直接傷害:如果言論有建構社會結構,以及建構主體在社會結構中的位置之能力,剝奪這項能力,就是在剝奪未成年人透過性言論與現實世界進行交互辯證的能力,並剝奪其建立以及發展自我主體性之重要工具。
    Reference: Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance. (2010, April 9). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antipornography_Civil_Rights_Ordinance&oldid=354962821
    Archard, D. W. (2006). Children's rights. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-children/
    Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Brighouse, H. (2003). How should children be heard? Arizona Law Review, 45(3), 691-711.
    Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Butler, J. (2003). Beauvoir on Sade: Making sexuality into an ethic. In C. Card (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir (pp. 168-188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
    Cline, V. B. (2001). Pornography's effects on adults and children. New York, NY: Morality in Media, Inc.
    Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman as victim: Story of O. Feminist Studies, 2(1), 107-111.
    Dworkin, R. (1991a). Liberty and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 38(14), 12-15.
    Dworkin, R. (1991b). Two concepts of liberty. In E. Ullmann-Margalit & A. Margalit (Ed.), Isaiah Berlin: A celebration (pp. 100-109). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    Dworkin, R. (1993). Women and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 40(17), 36, 38, 40-42.
    Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968).
    Green, L. (1998). Pornographizing, subordinating, and silencing. In R. C. Post (Ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of cultural regulation (pp. 285-311). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities.
    Hughes, D. R. (2001). How pornography harms children. Retrieved from
    http://www.protectkids.com/effects/harms.htm
    Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).
    Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4), 293-330.
    Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Lo, V. & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents' sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 221-237.
    Lovelace, L. & McGrady, M. (1980). Ordeal. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
    MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    MacKinnon, C. (1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    MacKinnon, C. & Dworkin, A. (1997). (Ed.). In harm's way: the pornography civil rights hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Matthews, G. B. (1982). Conceiving childhood: “Child animism”. Noûs, 16(1), 29-37.
    Mill, J. S. (1998). On liberty and other essays. Gray, J. (Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
    Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night (pp. 134-140). New York, NY: William Morrow.
    Pareles, J. (1990, June 17). An album is judged obscene; Rap: Slick, violent, nasty and, maybe hopeful. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
    R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).
    Saint Paul, Minn. Legis. Code § 292.02 (1990).
    Schapiro, T. (1999). What is a child? Ethics, 109(4), 715-738.
    Taylor, T. (1795). A vindication of the rights of brutes. Boston, MA: Benjamin Sweetser & William Burdick. Available from http://jenda.lib.nccu.edu.tw/search~S5*cht/?searchtype=t&searcharg=A+Vindication+of+the+Rights+of+Brutes
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). International guidelines on sexuality education: An evidence informed approach to effective sex, relationships and HIV/STI education. Paris, France: UNESCO.
    Wis. Stat. § 939.645 (1991).
    Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 486 (1993).
    Wolf, S. (1980). Asymmetrical freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 151-166.
    Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston, MA: Peter Edes. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/vindicationofrig00wollrich/vindicationofrig00wollrich_djvu.txt
    Zillmann, D. (1989). Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 127-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    中華民國刑法(2010)。
    出版品及錄影節目帶分級辦法(2005)。
    何春蕤(1994)。豪爽女人。台北市:皇冠文學出版有限公司。
    兒童及少年福利法(2010)。
    兒童及少年性交易防制條例(2007)。
    淫妲三代、端爺、洪凌合著(2006)。皮繩愉虐邦。台北市:性林文化出版。
    許敏溶(2010年6月6日)。台大美女當明星「可惜」校長有感而發。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/32566690/IssueID/20100606
    黃詠梅(2008)。從「性虐待」到「皮繩愉虐邦」──考察台灣愉虐實踐的社群文化與集結政略。未出版之碩士論文,東海大學社會學研究所,台中市。
    楊惠琪(2009年9月30日)。太早教恐「教壞小朋友」。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/31937962/IssueID/20090913
    詹炳耀主持(2006)。校園BBS站相關法律問題研究(九十五年教育部補助辦理資訊教育及網路學習推廣活動)。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所。擷取自:http://www.edu.tw/moecc/content.aspx?site_content_sn=5285
    電腦網路內容分級處理辦法(2005)。
    鄭光明(2009)。不可說的在言噤聲:藍騰的反色情論證。歐美研究,39(1),169-224。
    釋字第四○七號解釋(1996)。司法院公報,38(8),15-32。
    釋字第六一七號解釋(2007)。司法院公報,49(1),1-75。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    93154006
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    15400601.pdf1821KbAdobe PDF2056View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback