English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23481291      Online Users : 235
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37471


    Title: 環境議題的政治經濟分析-以聯合國氣候綱要公約在臺灣的實踐為個案研究
    The Political Economy of the Environment Issue-a case study on the practice of the UNFCCC in Taiwan
    Authors: 劉雅娟
    Liu, Ya-Chuan
    Contributors: 劉小蘭
    Liu, Hsiao-Lan
    劉雅娟
    Liu, Ya-Chuan
    Keywords: 政治經濟分析
    全球曖化
    環境議題
    聯合國氣候綱要公約
    永續發展
    Political Economy
    Global Warming
    Environment Protection
    UNFCCC
    Sustainable Development
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 13:56:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究係透過聯合國氣候綱要公約在臺灣的實踐為個案研究來就環境政策形成過程為政治經濟分析。首先,先就環境問題的原因與特徵及國際環境意識形成的政治經濟因素為介紹。為了個案研究,也檢視了國際環境法在全球暖化議題的發展來了解國際的發展方向,再就臺灣的國內環境政策與國際環境政策為了解以提供本研究的背景資料。透過深度訪談來就組織、法令及政策來探討聯合國氣候綱要公約在臺灣的實踐。本研究發現,組織的設計仍有部分限制,相關法令尚未全面的檢視,政策則缺乏一上位的指導綱領。由於政治及經濟因素均對環境政策的發展扮演著重要的角色,臺灣未來有關全球暖化政策的發展取決於執政黨的決心與執行力。
    This study explores the political economy behind the environmental policy making process through a case study of Taiwan’s practice of the UNFCCC. First, this study analyzes the reasons and characteristics of environmental problems, as well as the political economy of the formation of international environment awareness. For the case study, the development of international environment law toward global warming is reviewed to clarify international trends in dealing with this problem. Next, the author analyzes two aspects of Taiwan’s environmental policy: domestic environmental policy and international environmental policy in the past fifty years to give background information of Taiwan’s global warming policy. Then, through in-depth interviews, an examination of organization, legislation, and policy aspects of the UNFCCC practice in Taiwan is conducted to understand how the policy implements. The conclusions are as followed: (1) Institution settings for Taiwan’s global warming policies still have some limitations and need to be reviewed. (2) Although some GHG reduction regulations have already been sent to the Legislative Yuan to be reviewed, the government has yet to carry out overwhelming legal evaluation in all aspects to address the climate change issues. (3) Policy lacks superior guidelines laying out the direction for whole country to follow and implement. After all, political and economic factors both play influential roles in the development of environmental policy. Taiwan’s future action regarding global warming still depends on the determination and executive ability of the new ruling party.
    Reference: English References:
    1. Anonymous(1997), Development and environment: From Stockholm to Rio, United Nations Chronicle. New York: 1997. Vol. 34, Iss. 2; pg. 36, 6 pgs
    2. Anand, R. (2004). International Environmental Justice-A North-South Dimension, Ashgate Publishing Limitedy, England.
    3. Agoramoorthy, G. and Hsu M.-J. (1997). Wildlife conservation in Taiwan, Conservation Biology 11(4),834-6
    4. Agoramoorthy, G. and Hsu, M.-J (2007). Is Taiwan’s Political and Economic Development an Environmental Nightmare, Environmental politics, 16(3), 504-512
    5. Bowser, R. (ed.) (1992), Southern Exposure: Global Climate Change and Developing Countries, Maryland, Center for Clobal Change USA.
    6. Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress, Sage, London.
    7. Boyce, J. K. (2002). The political economy of the environment, Cheltenham, Glos, U.K.; Northampton, Mass. Edward Elgar Pub.
    8. Brine, P. and Boyle, A. (2002). International law and the environment. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
    9. Brack, D. et al. (2000). International trade and Climate Change Policies. London: Earthscan.
    10. Balaam, D. N and Veseth, M. (2005). Introduction to International Political Economy, Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey, U.S.
    11. Ching, C. -C, Mendelsohn, R., and Shaw, D. (2003). Global Warming and the Asian Pacific, Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA
    12. Chi, C.-C. (1994). Growth with Pollution: Unsustainable Development in Taiwan and Its Consequences, Comparative International Development. 29(2), 23-47.
    13. Chi, C.-C. (1998). We do not have a Common Future: The Political Economy of the Dominant Environment Concern in the Wes, A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies No.31, Taiwan
    14. Congleton, R. (2001).Governing the Global environmental Commons: the Political Economy of International Environmental Treaties and Institutions, in Schulze,G and Ursprung, H. (eds)(2001). International Environmental Economics, Oxford university Press
    15. Clap, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2005). Paths to a green world: the political economy of the global environment, Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England. The MIT Press, c2005
    16. Dalby, S.(1992). Security, Modernity, Ecology: The delemmas of Post-Cold War Security Discourse, Alternatives 17,95-134
    17. Dwivedi, O.P. and Vajjpeiyi D.(1995), Environmental Policies in the Third World, Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press.
    18. Edmonds, R. L.(1996). Taiwan’s Environment Today, China Quarterly, 148, 1224-1259.
    19. Gold, T.(1986). State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (New York: M.E. Sharpe).
    20. Groenwegen, P. (1987). 'Political economy' and 'economics', The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 3, 904-907.
    21. Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    22. Grubb, M. and Paterson M. (1992), International Affairs, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 68(2), 293-310
    23. Grubb, M. (1995), From Rio to Kyoto to Berlin: Climate Change and the Prospects For International Action, in Grubb M. and Anderson D.(eds), The Emerging International Regime for Climate Change: Structures and Options after Berlin, Report of a Workshop held at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, United Kingdom, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
    24. Gupta, J. (1997). The Climate Change Convention and developing countries: from conflict to consensus?, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; Baston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    25. Grundmann, R.(2007). Climate Change and Knowledge Politics, Environmental Politics, 16(3), 414 – 432, June 2007
    26. Hurrell, A.and Kingsbury, B.(1992).The Internaional Politics of the Environment, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
    27. Huang, J.I., Young, R.T. and Fang, L.G.(1994). Discussion on under which Category shall Taiwan Belong in the FCCC, Energy, Resource, Environment Wuarterly7(1),(45).(Mandarin.)
    28. Houghton J.T. et al. (eds.) (1996). Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in collaboration with the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations environment Programme (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1996).
    29. Koening, D.(1995). Sustainable Development: Linking Global Enviornmental Change to Technology Cooperation, in Dwivedi O.P and Vajpeyi D.K. (eds), Environmental Policies in the Third World: Acomparative Analysis, Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press.
    30. Kahn, H., Brown, W. and Martel L. (1976). The next 200 years: A Scenario for America and the World, New York, William Morrow & co.
    31. Kahn, H. and Simon, J. (1984). The Resourceful Earth, Basil Blackwell, New York
    32. Kim, S. (2000). Democratization and Environmentalism: South Korea and Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. African and Asian Studies, 35.
    33. Lin, Brian, C.-A. (2007). Green Politics(in press)
    34. Liu, C.M. et al.(1996), the Proposed National Communication to the FCCC (a research project financed by the EPA of the Executive Yuan), Taipei: GCC of the NTU (Mandarin)
    35. Lyons, D. (2005). Environmental Protection in Taiwan: Is it Too Much Too Fast?, Journal of Contemporary Asia. 35 (2).
    36. Lee, Y. S. and So, A. (ed.) (1999). Asia’s Environmental Movement: Comparative Perspectives ,Armonk, NY:M.E.Sharpe.
    37. Loibl, G. (2004). The Evolving Regime on Climate Change and Sustainable Development. In Schrijver N.and Weiss F.(eds), International Law and Sustainable Development, (pp.73-96). The Netherlands: Martuns Nijhoff.
    38. Leng, T.K.(2005). Sustainable Development in Canada and Taiwan: Comparative and Internaional Perspectives. In Harris P.G.(eds.), Confronting Environmental Change in East & Southeast Asian,(pp.201-218).New York: United Nations University Press.
    39. Meadow, et al.(1972). Limits to Growth issued by Club of Rome in 1972
    40. McCormick, J.(1989). Reclaiming Paradise: The Global Environemntal Moverment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    41. Munasinghe, M.(1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development, Washington DC, World Bank
    42. Miquez, D.G. (2002). Equity, responsibility and climate change. In Rosa, Luix pinquelli and Munasinghe M.(eds).(2002). Ethics, Equity and International Negotiations on Climate Chang, (pp.7-35).USA:Edward Elgar
    43. Matsui, Y. (2004). The Principle of “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”. In Nico Schrijver and Friedl Weiss (eds), International Law and Sustainable Development, (pp.73-96). The Netherlands: Martuns Nijhoff.
    44. McBeath, G.A. and Leng, T.K. (2006).Governance of Biodiversity Conservation in China and Taiwan,USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
    45. O’riordan, T. and Jager, J. (eds.)(1996). Politics of Climate Change-a european perspective, London, Routledge.
    46. Oates, W. E. and. Portney, P.P. ( 2001). The Political Economy of Environmental Policy , in Mäler, K. G. and Vincent J. R. (ed.) (2003). Handbook of Environmental Economics, volume 1: Environmental Degradation and Institutional Responses (2003),(pp.325-354).
    47. Paterson, M. (1996). Global Warming and Global Politics, London and New York, Routledge.
    48. Pao, P.K. (2002). International environmental law and economics, Blackwell Publishers, Massachusetts, U.S.
    49. Pittock, A.B.(2007).Climate Change-Turning up the Heat,Australian, CSIRO publishing.
    50. Rosa, Luiz pinquelli and Munasinghe M. (eds). (2002). Ethics, Equity and International Negotiations on Climate Chang, Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA
    51. Sprinz, D.and Vaahtoranta, T.(1994). The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy, 48 International Organization, 77,87.
    52. Stevis D. and Assetto, V. J. (2001). The International Political Economy of the Environment-Critical Perspectives, U.S: Lynne Rienner Publisher Inc.
    53. Schulze, G. G.. and Ursprung, H. W. (2001). International Environmental Economics-A survey of the Issues, Oxford University Press UK, P241-263
    54. Shih, W.-C. (2002). The Implementation of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in a Non-Party State: Taiwan. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2, 69-98.
    55. Shih, W.-C. (2005a). Taiwan’s International Environmental Policy: Balancing Trade and the Environment, In Harris P.G.(eds.), Confronting Environmental Change in East & Southeast Asian,(pp.119-132).New York: United Nations University Press.
    56. Schmidt, C.(2001).Incentives for International Environmental cooperation: Theoretical Models and Economic Instruments in Schulze and Ursprung (2001).International Environmental Economics- A survey of the Issues, Oxford University Press UK.
    57. Tang, S.-Y and Tang, C.-P. (1997).Democratization and Environmental Politics in Taiwan, Asian Survey, 37(3),281-294
    58. Tang, S.-Y and Tang, C.-P. (2000). The Political Economy of Environmental Impact Assessment and Air Pollution Prevention Fees in Taiwan, Comparative Politcs, 33(1), 81-99.
    59. Toke, D. (2000). Green Politics and New-Liberalism, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
    60. Wall, D. (2006). Green Economics: An Introduction and Research Agenda, International Journal of Green Economics, 1
    61. Vons, B. (2003). Climate change: How can developing countries benefit from entering into the force of Kyoto protocol, http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/car/html/car7_article1.pdf (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    62. Xepapadeas A. (1997). Advanced Principles in Environmental Policy, UK: Edward Elgar.
    63. Young, J. (1994). Sustainable Development and Green Politics, in James E. Hickey and Linda A. Longmire(eds.), The environment: Global Problems, Local Soutions. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
    64. Young, R.T.(1995), FCCC COP1: the Analysis and its Impact upon Taiwan, Hsinchu(Taiwan) ITRI (Mandarin).
    65. Yeh, J.-R. (1996). Institutional Capacity-Building toward Sustainable Development: Taiwan’s environment Protection in the Climate of Economic Development and Political Liberalization, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law Vol.6, 229-272.
    Chinese References
    1. 台灣不願面對的真相(2007)。天下雜誌,第369期,101頁。
    2. 李永展(2003)。解讀永續發展。(未出版) 桃園縣:92年度桃園縣第一梯次社區動力營。
    3. 李河清(2004a)。知識社群與全球氣候談判。 問題與研究雙月刊,43,6,73-112。
    4. 李河清(2004b)。氣候變遷整合評估模式:從IPCC到 Taiwan-IPCC。 中華民國環境保護學會學刊,27(1),136-155。
    5. 吳振源著 (1995)。,臺灣環保問題的政經分析。國立成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士論文,台南
    6. 吳再益、黃釋偉 (2004)。 政府能源政策之制定及執行成效探討。國家政策季刊,3(2),51-78。
    7. 宋書帆(2007)。論我國應有之溫室氣體減量法制。(未出版),新竹:國立清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    8. 林榮仁(2005)。從「互賴理論的『敏感性與脆弱性』」的概念探討我國溫室氣體的減量政策。(未出版)花蓮,國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    9. 紀駿傑(1998)。我們沒有共同的未來:西方主流“環保”關懷的政治經濟學。臺灣社會研究季刊,31,141-168。
    10. 倪貴榮(2002)。臺灣在國際環境法上之地位(The Status of Taiwan in International Environmental Law )。臺大法學論叢,31(2),97-130。
    11. 施文真(2001)。臺灣於環境保護v.s.自由貿易之國際辯論中的定位。臺大法學論叢第三十一卷第一期。
    12. 施文真(2005b)。台灣參與國際環保類之組織與公約的意義與可行性。台灣國際法季刊2(1),125-173。
    13. 宮文祥(2004)。環境保護規範手段之研究-以温室效應公約內國法化為例。(未出版)台北:國立臺北大學法學研究所碩士論文。
    14. 宮本憲一(1996)。環境經濟學。(高增杰譯)。台北:五南出版社。(原著出版年:1996)
    15. 高希均、林祖嘉(1997)。經濟學的世界:中篇。台北:天下出版社。
    16. 陳佳成(2002)。國際體制形成之探討:以京都議定書為例。(未出版),台中,東海大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    17. 梁啟源(2007)。我國永續發展之能源價格政策。台灣經濟預測與政策,32(2)。
    18. 黃錦堂(1994)。台灣地區環境法之研究。台北:月旦出版社。
    19. 黃錦堂(1999)。民主化對環保政策衝擊與因應之道。理論與政策季刊,13(3),19-46。
    20. 許志義(2003)。環境基本法通過之後資源永續發展及利用應注重誘因機制。經濟前瞻,85,107-109。
    21. Tim Doyle, McEachern(2001)。環境與政治。(陳潁峰譯)。台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。(原著出版年:1998)。
    22. 曾華璧(2001)。人與環境-臺灣現代環境史論。台北:正中書局。
    23. 傅岳邦(2004)。 全球治理運作模式之研究:以締約關係途徑分析《京都議定書》個案為例。(未出版)台北:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    24. 葉俊榮(1993)。透析台灣環境政策與環保法令,載於蕭新煌,蔣本基,劉小如,朱雲鵬合著,台灣2000年(1993),(頁207-232),台北:天下出版社。
    25. 葉俊榮(1999)。全球環境議題-台灣觀點。台北:巨流出版社。
    26. 葉俊榮 (2000)。溫室氣體管制立法之研究。行政院環境保護署八十九年委託研究計畫。執行單位:財團法人台大法學基金會。
    27. 張清溪等著(2000)。經濟學理論與實際。四版上冊,頁352-356。
    28. 廖英良(1998)。環境保護政策的政治經濟學分析。(未出版)台中:私立東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    29. 廖章鈞 (2000)。台灣環境保護政策之研究(1992年~2000年)-戰略思考觀點之分析。(未出版)台北:淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文
    30. 蔣本基,顧洋,林志深,鄭耀文(2006)。我國溫室氣體減量整體因應策略。科學與工程技術期刊,2(1),1-8。
    31. 駱尚廉、顏秀慧(2002)。環境資源主管機關之定位與職權探討。國家政策季刊,1(1),183-194。
    32. 劉阿榮(2000)。臺灣之永續發展-國家與社會觀點。(未出版)。台北:國立臺灣大國家發展研究所博士論文。
    33. 劉哲良、吳珮璊、溫麗琪(2005)。台灣能源供需結構與能源相關環保議題之回顧及展望。全球變遷雜誌,48,12-20。
    34. 蕭全政(2003)。何謂政治經濟學?(未出版)成功大學政治經濟研究所主辦,政治經濟學學科定位學術研討會,台南成功大學。
    35. 蕭旻禎(2004)。從環境政治觀點論地球暖化現象之防制-以1997年京都議定書為例。(未出版)。台北:中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    36. 蕭代基(1998)。永續發展的意義與政策方向。經濟前瞻,56,44-49。
    37. 蕭代基、王京明、黃耀輝(2007)。能源稅是永續發展稅制改革的契機。經濟前瞻,112,105-112。
    38. 錢玉蘭(1998)。經濟發展與環境保護可雙贏,經濟前瞻,第55期,1998年3月5日
    39. 魏國棟(2003)。氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具:文獻回顧。經濟研究,39(1),臺北大學經濟學系出版。
    40. 羅傳賢 (2002)。立法程序與技術, 台北,五南出版社。
    Internet Resources:
    1. World Resource Institute http://www.wri.org/publication/content/8362 (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    2. International Energy Agency website: http://www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/indicators.asp?COUNTRY_CODE=TW (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    3. Bureau of Energy, MOEA website: http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw, http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/policy/EnergyWhitePaper/94/main/main03-1.html (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    4. National Council of Sustainable Development website:http://sta.epa.gov.tw/NSDN/en/introduction/introduction.htm (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    5. Council of economic planning and development website: http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000169&key=&ex=%20&ic=&cd (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    6. http://www.ipcc.ch/(accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    7. Libertytimes website: http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/may/25/today-e2.htm (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    8. Meeting of sustainable development affairs website: http://60.248.4.115/NCSD/category/home.htm (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    9. National Statistics, R.O.C.(Taiwan) http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4 (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    10. 環保署網站http://www.epa.gov.tw(accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    11. 能源局能源產業温室氣體中心http://eigic.estc.tw/download/CO2.doc (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    12. 氣候變化綱要公約資訊網 http://sd.erl.itri.org.tw/fccc/APP_/index_c.asp (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    13. 國際氣候變化綱要公約官方網站 http://unfccc.int/home/items/993.php(accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    14. 環境資訊中心(財團法人環境資源研究發展基金會) http://e-info.org.tw/ (accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    15. 國家永續發展策略與制度建置 http://www.ier.org.tw/SD/(accessed on May 10th of 2008)
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    臺灣研究英語碩士學位學程
    93924004
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093924004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[台灣研究英語碩士學程(IMTS)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    92400401.pdf109KbAdobe PDF1088View/Open
    92400402.pdf82KbAdobe PDF1048View/Open
    92400403.pdf13KbAdobe PDF1043View/Open
    92400404.pdf18KbAdobe PDF1086View/Open
    92400405.pdf60KbAdobe PDF1128View/Open
    92400406.pdf129KbAdobe PDF1290View/Open
    92400407.pdf159KbAdobe PDF1791View/Open
    92400408.pdf104KbAdobe PDF1241View/Open
    92400409.pdf101KbAdobe PDF3507View/Open
    92400410.pdf364KbAdobe PDF1415View/Open
    92400411.pdf30KbAdobe PDF1703View/Open
    92400412.pdf247KbAdobe PDF1468View/Open
    92400413.pdf145KbAdobe PDF1016View/Open
    92400414.pdf165KbAdobe PDF1069View/Open
    92400415.pdf14KbAdobe PDF1039View/Open
    92400416.pdf214KbAdobe PDF1350View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback