English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118693 (75%)
Visitors : 23572114      Online Users : 263
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33363


    Title: Cognitive-Semantic Mechanisms Behind Heart Idioms
    英文中"Heart"成語之認知語意機制
    Authors: 王信斌
    Wang,Hsin-pin
    Contributors: 賴惠玲
    王信斌
    Wang,Hsin-pin
    Keywords: 隱喻
    換喻
    成語

    認知語意學
    metaphor
    metonymy
    idiom
    heart
    Cognitive Semantics
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:23:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文從認知語意學的角度來探討英文中 “Heart” 成語所牽涉到的認知語意機制,並以Lakoff (1993)所提出的當代隱喻理論、Kövecses & Radden (1998)從認知語言學角度針對換喻所做的研究以及Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和換喻的三個交互模式為基礎,進一步探討 “Heart” 成語的字面語意如何透過這些機制衍生出其象徵語意。此外,本論文也對收集到的七十七個 “Heart” 成語進行重新分類以修正Niemeier’s (2003)在 “Heart” 成語分類上所產成的謬誤。
    研究分析發現七十七個 “Heart” 成語所牽涉的認知語意機制包括Lakoff (1993)提出的五種隱喻類型以及Kövecses & Radden (1998)提出的十五種換喻類型其中的六種,而七十七個 “Heart” 成語的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結則無法僅僅透過Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和換喻的三個交互模式進行建立,而必須加上本研究另外發現的四個新的交互模式才能完整建立起七十七個 “Heart” 成語的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結。
    Based on the contemporary theory of metaphor by Lakoff (1993), a cognitive view toward metonymy by Kövecses & Radden (1998), and models of how metaphor can interact with metonymy by Ruiz de Mendoza (2003), this thesis makes an effort in exploring the cognitive-semantic mechanisms behind the 77 heart idioms collected for this research. Although Niemeier (2003) has tried to explore the metaphorical and metonymic bases for the heart idioms in English, her analysis is not satisfactory and can not meet the goal of this current research. A recategorization of heart idioms is therefore performed to encompass all the features exhibited by them before the cognitive-semantic analysis is proposed.
    The analysis of heart idioms discovers that a full explanation of their figurative meanings requires the activation of all the five types of metaphor proposed by Lakoff (1993) and six out of the 15 types of metonymy-producing relationships proposed by Kövecses & Radden (1998). Furthermore, to fully account for the figurative meanings of heart idioms, the analysis also proposes six interaction models of between metaphor and metonymy, two of which are proposed in Ruiz de Mendoza (2003) and four of which are discovered by the current study.
    Reference: A Dictionary of Current English Phrases and Idioms. 1993. The
    Crane Publishing.
    Carter, R. and M, McCarthy. 1988. Vocabulary and Language
    Teaching. London: Longman.
    Chafe, W. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language,
    University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press,
    Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations, Columbia
    University Press, New York.
    Clore, G. L., A, Ortony., and M, A, Foss. 1987. The
    Psychological Foundations of the Affective Lexicon. Journal
    of Personality and Social Psychology. 53. 751-766.
    Fraser, B. 1970. Idioms Within a Transformational Grammar.
    Foundations of Language 6, 22-42.
    Geeraerts, D. 1995. Specialization and Reinterpretation in
    Idioms. In Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives,
    M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder
    (eds), 57 -74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1990. "Psycholinguistic Studies on the
    Conceptual Basis of Idiomaticity." Cognitive Linguistics. 1
    (4):417-451.
    Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1995. Idiomaticity and Human Cognition. In
    Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives, M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder
    (eds), 97-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford:
    Oxford UP.
    Johnson-Laird, P. N. and K, Oatley. 1989. Basic Emotions,
    Rationality, and Folk Theory. Cognition and Emotion. 6, 201-
    223.
    Johnson-Laird, P. N. and K, Oatley. 1992. The Language of
    Emotions: An Analysis of a Semantic Field. Cognition and
    Emotion. 3, 81-123.
    Katz, J. 1973. Compositionality, Idiomaticity, and Lexical
    Substitution. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New
    York.
    Kövecses, Z. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Kövecses, Z. and G, Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a
    cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77.
    Kövecses, Z. and P, Szabó. 1996. Idioms: A view from cognitive
    semantics. Applied Linguistics 17(3). 326-355.
    Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In
    Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd edition.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202-251.
    Lakoff, G., and M, Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By.
    Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakoff, G. and M, Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field
    Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago
    Press.
    Niemeier, S. 2003. Straight from the Heart — Metonymic and
    Metaphorical Explorations. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the
    Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio Barcelona (eds),
    195-213. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, S.
    Nunberg, G., I, A, Sag., and T, Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language
    70, 491-538.
    Oatley, K. and P, N, Johnson-Laird. 1987. Towards a cognitive
    theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion. 1, 29-50.
    online Cambridge Dictionary of American English. Cambridge
    University Press, 2004. <http://dictionary.cambridge.org/>
    Radden, G. 2003. How Metonymic are Metaphors? In Metaphor and
    Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio
    Barcelona (eds), 93-108. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter,
    S.
    Ruiz de Mendoza Ib&aacute;&ntilde;ez, F. J. 2003. The Role of Mappings and
    Domains in Understanding Metonymy. In Metaphor and Metonymy
    at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio Barcelona
    (eds), 109-132. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, S.
    TheFreeDictionary.com. Farlex, Inc. Huntingdon Valley, PA,
    2004. <http://www.thefreedictionary.com/>
    The Origins of Famous Sayings.
    <http://www.screamingmonkeylabs.com/sayings.html >
    Webster’s New World Dictionary. 1990. 3rd edition; Hungry
    Minds, Inc.
    Wittgenstein, L. 1978. Philosophical Investigations. Translated
    by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Yu, N. 2003. Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive
    Linguistics 14(2/3), 141–165. 2003.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    89555002
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089555002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    55500201.pdf39KbAdobe PDF1489View/Open
    55500202.pdf43KbAdobe PDF3318View/Open
    55500203.pdf42KbAdobe PDF1688View/Open
    55500204.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2084View/Open
    55500205.pdf53KbAdobe PDF6001View/Open
    55500206.pdf84KbAdobe PDF2498View/Open
    55500207.pdf83KbAdobe PDF3494View/Open
    55500208.pdf119KbAdobe PDF2497View/Open
    55500209.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2365View/Open
    55500210.pdf54KbAdobe PDF1550View/Open
    55500211.pdf46KbAdobe PDF3552View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback