English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88654/118227 (75%)
Visitors : 23500240      Online Users : 328
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30361


    Title: 台灣幹細胞產業關鍵成功因素之研究
    Authors: 李光申
    Contributors: 尹啟銘
    李光申
    Keywords: 幹細胞
    因素分析
    關鍵成功因素
    Stem Cell
    Factor analysis
    Key Success Factor
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:44:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 生技產業這一二十年來成為各國政府產業培植的重點,而台灣也積極發展生技產業,在生技產業中幹細胞領域屬新興、萌芽的一個領域,而在此領域中台灣也具備發展的基礎,由於本人研究領域為幹細胞,因此期望藉由本次研究,瞭解國內外幹細胞產業之發展,以及應用量化的方式找出幹細胞產業發展之關鍵成功因素,期望對於學術界、產業界以及政府提供幹細胞產業未來發展的一個建議。
    本研究將40份樣本問卷進行因素分析,將37個問卷的變項歸納出三個關鍵成功因素,因素一命名為「企業品牌、產品、行銷與服務」,顯示一個產業要發展最重要的還是企業本身的能力,能否提供好的產品、服務,配合企業的品牌與行銷,才能夠帶領著產業不斷發展與進步。因素二命名為「產業發展、技術移轉以及產業策略」,產業本身發展的方向、技術以及策略等,是第二個影響因素。因素三命名為「政府、創投資金與社會、產學合作關係」,表示除了企業本身、產業之外,外在社會環境、政府等也是息息相關,三者互相配合才能夠促進產業活絡與前進。
    在因素分析之後,本研究將三項關鍵因素與台灣現況進行交叉分析,結果顯示三項關鍵因素與台灣發展現況呈現負相關的結果,表示在三方面,台灣的發展仍然有待加強。
    雖然在關鍵因素上與台灣發展現況上顯示負相關,但從台灣發展普遍性來看,受訪的專家學者對於台灣在各問項的表現平均有三分,細胞治療產業在全球仍然處於萌芽與起步的階段,台灣在此階段已經具備一定的基礎與水準,若能夠加緊基礎建設、人才培育、產業發展與技術創新,相信在此領域仍然有無窮的潛力與機會。
    Biotechnology has become an important focus for industrial development in the majority of developed countries in the past two decades or so. In Taiwan, the government also highly encourages the development of biotech industry. Among various disciplines of biotechnology, stem cell-related industry is a newly emerging field expected with high potentials of industrialization. Indeed Taiwan does possess the basis for such development. Because of my background as a clinician scientist specializing in stem cell research, in the current study I expect to understand the current status of development of stem cell industry nationally and internationally, as well as to quantify the critical key success factors for such development. It is hoped that the results of this study can offer substantial help to the academic, the government as well as the industry to develop stem cell-based cell therapy.

    In this study, factor analysis has been performed based on 40 questionnaires. We summarized three key success factors out of 37 variables. The first one is “Branding, product, marketing and service”, showing that all in all, the most critical key success factor still is about the core competence of the enterprise. The ability of offering good products and services, in conjunction with branding and marketing, is the major driving force for enterprise to flourish. The second key success factor is “Enterprise development, technology transfer and enterprise strategy”, suggesting the importance of strategy and directions of enterprise development. The third key success factor is “Government, Venture capitalist and academia-industry-society relationship”. This indicates that apart from the enterprise and the industry per se, the external environment and government policy also plays a critical role.

    Following the factor analysis mentioned above, cross analysis was also performed to evaluate the current situation in Taiwan. However, the results showed a negative correlation, indicating that the overall situation is unsatisfactory and needs to be improved in order to ensure the success of stem cell industry development in Taiwan. Having said that, the average score from the interviewed experts was three. Given the fact that stem cell industry is still at its beginning, the results showed that Taiwan has had certain fundamental development and standards. As long as the training of manpower and infrastructure can be further improved, it is believed Taiwan still have great opportunities in this field.
    中文摘要 2
    Abstract 3
    致謝詞 4
    目錄 5
    表目錄 6
    圖目錄 8
    第一章 緒論 9
    第一節 研究背景與動機 9
    第二節 研究目的 12
    第三節 研究流程 13
    第二章 文獻探討 14
    第一節 台灣生物科技產業發展 14
    第二節 幹細胞之定義、發展與技術 21
    第三節 幹細胞治療之應用方向 29
    第四節 全球細胞治療發展現況 32
    第五節 關鍵成功因素 52
    第三章 研究方法 67
    第一節 研究模型與架構 67
    第二節 資料收集方式與問卷來源 68
    第三節 資料分析方法 70
    第四節 問卷變項 71
    第四章 統計分析 73
    第一節 敘述統計分析 73
    第二節 關鍵成功因素因素分析 79
    第三節 關鍵成功因素與台灣現況比較分析 94
    第五章 研究結論與建議 96
    第一節 研究結論 96
    第二節 研究建議 98
    第三節 後續研究方向 101
    文獻探討 102
    附錄一 105
    附錄二 109
    Reference: 一、中文部分:
    1. 大前研一著(民74),黃宏義(民76),「策略家的智慧」,長河出版社。
    2. 左峻德(1997),國家競爭力和經濟成長率之互動關係,台灣經濟研究月刊,20(4),15-21
    3. 王啟光(民88),生技製藥業關鍵成功之研究,淡江大學管理科學學系碩士論
    4. 余遠德(民85),我國汽車製造業關鍵成功因素之探討,中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    5. 田蔚城(民86),生物技術導論,生物產業,第八卷,第一期,1-12。
    6. 吳思華(1988),「產業政策與企業政策」,中國經濟企業研究院。
    7. 牟敦剛(民85),推動我國生物技術及相關產業昇級之課題探討,生物產業,7(3),1-12。
    8. 孟德芸(1988),「企業成功關鍵因素之研究-以個人電腦產業為實證」,中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    9. 李連滋、江淑芬 (民86),「我國潛在新興產業SWOT 分析—以生物技術產業為例」, 經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第3卷第3期,頁95—108。
    10. 侯芙芊(1986),「民國六十年代台灣製造業外銷能力之探討」,國立中山大學企管研究所碩士論文。
    11. 黃星滿(1994),產業技術水準與國際競爭力之相關性(上),臺灣經濟月刊,(209),52-73。
    12. 黃星滿(1994),產業技術水準與國際競爭力之相關性(下),臺灣經濟月刊,(210),54-79。
    13. 楊旻翰(民89),台灣生技產業前景及各國發展模式分析,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    14. 陳來明(民85),「我國生物技術產業分析-資源基礎觀點」,國立政治 大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    15. 經濟部工業局 (民93),2004生技產業白皮書。
    16. 經濟部工業局 (民94),2005生技產業白皮書。
    二、英文部分:
    1. Aaker, D.A. (1988) “Strategy Market Management”, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc.
    2. Ansoff, Igor H. (1984), “Implanting Strategic Management “, UK: Prentice Hall International LTD
    3. Anthony, R. N., & Dearden, J. (1976), Management control systems text and cases, Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.
    4. Byars, Lloyd L. (1987), “Strategic Management: Planning and Implementation”, 2nd ed., New York: Harper and Row Publishers Inc.
    5. Boseman, Glenn (1986), “Strategic Management: Text and Cases”, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    6. Boynton, Andrew C. and Zmud, Robert W. (1985), “ An Assessment of Critical Success Factors”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.25, No.4
    7. Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M., “The Theory of Cooperation in International Bussiness,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business, 1988, pp.31-34.
    8. Crookell, K. (1987). Achieving international competitiveness. Busi-ness Quarterly, 52(1), 110-115.
    9. Day, G.S. and Wensley, R. (1988), “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority”, Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), pp.1-20.
    10. Dainel, R. D. (1961), “ Management Information Crisis Havard Business Review”, Sep-Oct. Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 107-118.
    11. Davis, R.and L.G. Thomas (1993), Direct estimation of synergy: A new approach to the diversity performance debate, Management Science,Vol.39, No.3, pp.1334-1346.
    12. D' Cruz, J. R. & Rugman, A.M.(1993)“Business Network for International Competitiveness,” Business Quarterly, (56): 4, pp.101-107
    13. Duffey, J. “Competitiveness and Human Resources,” California Management Review, 30:3 (Spring 1988), pp.92-100.
    14. Ferguson, C.R. and R.Dickinson (1982), “Critical Success Factor for Directors in the Eighties ” Business Horizons, May-June
    15. Hill, Charles W. and Jones, Gareth R. (1995), “Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach “, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.,
    16. Hofer, C. W., & Schendle, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. West Publishing Company.
    17. Kanz, J. W. (1994). Technology, power and structure: Consequences for U. S. semiconductor competitiveness. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(5), 733-755.
    18. Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. P. (1994). The state as strategist in inter-national business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 512-535.
    19. Leidecker J. K. & Bruno A. V. (1984). Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors. Long Range Planning, 17, 23-32
    20. Makhija M. V. & Ganesh U. (1997). ‘The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning-related Joint Ventures’, Organization Science, Vol.8, No.5, pp. 508-527.
    21. Martin, E.W. (1982), “critical Success Factors of Chief MIS/DP Executives”, MIS quarterly, Vol, 6 No2
    22. Munro, Malcom C. and Wheeler, Basil R. (1980) “Planning critical Success Factors, and Management’s Information Requirement”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.14, No.4
    23. Oakey, R. P. (1993), ‘Predatory Networking : The Role of Small Firms in the Development of the British Biotechnology Indus-try’, International Small Business Journal, Vol.11(4), pp.9-22.
    24. Porter, M. E. (1980), “Competitive Strategies”, NY: Free Press.
    25. Porter, M. E. (1985), “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,” New York: Free Press.
    26. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations: With an introduction. New York: The Free Press.
    27. Rockart, J.F. (1979), Chief executives defined their own data needs, Harvard Business Review, March / April: pp.81-93.
    28. Rue, Leslie W. and Holland, Phyllis G. (1987), “Strategic management: Concepts AND Experience”, New York: McGraw-Hill, inc.,
    29. Spalding, B. J. (1986). How biotechnology is farming as an industry. Chemical Week, 139(23), 9-13.
    30. Thompson, A. A. (1981). Strategy Formulation and Implementation (pp. 101-106). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    31. Thomas, Joe G. (1988) “Strategic Management: Concepts, Practice, and Cases” New York: Harper and Row, Publishers
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    92932903
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092932903
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML256View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback