English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118697 (75%)
Visitors : 23578243      Online Users : 234
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/29822
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29822


    Title: 中外企業推動管理變革差異之研究:以飛利浦與光寶引進六標準差制度為例
    The Empirical Studies in Domestic and Foreign Enterprises in Triggering Organization Change
    Authors: 曾裕源
    Tseng, Yu Yuan
    Contributors: 王秉鈞
    賴士葆

    Wang, B.J.
    Lai, S.B.

    曾裕源
    Tseng, Yu Yuan
    Keywords: 六標準差
    組織變革
    學習型組織
    全面品質管理
    Six Sigma
    Organization Change
    Learning Organization
    Total Quality Management
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 16:40:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 成功的企業要有能力隨時依經營環境的變遷,來調整公司的經營方針和策略,才不會因時代進步而面臨被淘汰的危機。企業面臨的競爭壓力也是與日俱增,現在企業面臨的,是全世界的挑戰,仍一味採用過去的思考模式經營,可能會因為進步緩慢而難以因應快速變遷的市場。企業領導人應環境變遷導引組織內變革應用到企業內各個單位,每次的改變必須有一定的學理或實務作參考依據,才不會失去了前進的方向,因為錯誤的改變可能會引導企業走向結束營業的危機。

    本研究針對6 Sigma理論基礎先行探討,了解其活動之特性;而對推動的領導者風格及相關管理工具運用,除深入研究運作的理論基礎外,也檢討以策略為基礎組織規劃推論,以為完整企業成功變革之理論基礎與最佳實務之參考。

    針對在學術文獻回顧中發現的可議論點,本研究也由中外企業個案公司全球策略執行時提出延伸或不同的看法,從個案研究歸納出以六標準差成功變革企業成功經驗,以增進學術論文論點的完整性及實證性。

    最後,以六標準差策略活動的推動對組織帶來最大化的效益,做為後續學術研究者,或任何企業追求最佳標竿實務的參考。
    Great emphasis is placed upon the complexity and turbulence of the business contexts within today’s managers need to manage changes and align their corporate strategy and policy deployment in a bid for sustainable future. The challenge of global competition, increasingly in its very velocity, paves the way in which any of the businesses must transcend the preconceived legacy system where the change occurs. Visionary leaders usually trigger each change management initiative throughout their hierarchical organization reforms by which applicable management foundations or practices are adapted to new situations. It prevents any business, only through systematically structured change management, from bogging down into the unrecoverable crisis situation, but rather realize their systematically determined patterns of business growth or faster adaptation.

    This research explores the framework wherein Six Sigma theories and practices are set on the foundation around which the relevant management philosophy and tools are discussed. It is deemed as the most critical factor in which top management leaderships are heavily related to the business performance result and the extent of business excellence achievement.

    Built upon the debatable issues of management theorems in the literature review, a number of business propositions are made from which we conclude both the foreign and domestic case companies in this research, in anticipation for constructing a best-fit organization change by virtue of Six Sigma way in a more comprehensive and empirical approach.

    Last but not the least, the benefits result from Six Sigma management execution are presented in the concluding chapter, by which it will set the examples of the best practices for followers and practitioners in pursuit for Six Sigma philosophy.
    Reference: 1. Argyris, C and Schon, D (1978) Organization Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
    2. Almaraz, J.,“Quality management and the process of change,”Journal of Organizational Change Management,Vol.7 No.2,pp.6-14,1994
    3. Alexander, M.,“Six Sigma Book Review”Technometrics ,Vol.43 ,p.370,Aug 2001
    30. Anonymous, “The fundamentals of Six Sigma”, Quality Progress, Vol. 31 No. 6, June,pp. 36-7,(1998a)
    4. Anonymous,“What have been the results of Six Sigma?”, Quality Progress, Vol. 31 No. 6,June, p. 39. (1998b)
    5. Andres, Sousa-Poza; Halvard, N., and Henry, W.,“A cross-cultural study of the differing effects of corporate culture on TQM in three countries” International Journal of Quality &Reliability
    6. Barrow, J.W. (1993), ``Does total quality management equal organizational learning?'', Quality Progress, July, pp. 39-43.
    7. Burgoyne, J. and Pedler, M. (1994), ``Learning companies; their significance and characteristics'', Readings from The Learning Company Conference.
    8. Byrd, R.E. (1987), “Corporate leadership skills: a new synthesis”, Organizational Dynamics, Summer, pp. 34-43.
    9. Benchmarking: Leveraging “Best Practice Strategies.” International Benchmarking Clearinghouse, A White Paper for Senior Management, based on the internationally acclaimed 1995 study: Organizing & Managing Benchmarking.
    10. Deming, W.E. (1982), Out of the Crisis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    11. Dumaine, B. (1994), ``Mr learning organization'', Fortune, 17 October, pp. 147-57.
    12. Evans, J. and Lindsay, W. (1999), The Management and Control of Quality, 4th Ed., West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN.
    13. Flood, R. (1993), Beyond TQM, John Wiley & Sons, London, pp. 144-86.
    14. Ford, W. (1991), The Learning Enterprise: Integrating Total Quality Management and Workplace Reform and Renewal, Proceedings of the TQMI Conference, Sydney, pp. 59-62.
    15. Garvin, D.A. (1988), Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge, The Free Press, New York, NY.
    16. Garvin, D.A. (1991), ``How the Baldrige Award really works'', Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 6, pp.80-93.
    17. Garvin D.A. (1993), ``Building a learning organization'', Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 78-91.
    18. Grant, R.M., Shani, R. and Krishnan, R. (1994), ``TQM's challenge to management practice'', Sloan Management Review, Winter, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 25-35.
    19. Government Manager’s Guide for Undertaking Customer Satisfaction Surveys. Logistics Management Institute, July 1996.
    20. Group Reward and Recognition. Logistics Management Institute, August 1997.
    21. Gratton, M. "Leadership in the Learning Organization." New Directions for Community Colleges 21, no. 4 (Winter 1993): 93-103. (ERIC No. EJ 479 918)
    22. Honey, P. and Mumford, A. (1991), A Manual of Learning Styles, Honey, London.
    23. Hammond, V., and Wille, E. "The Learning Organization." In Gower Handbook of Training and Development, 2d ed., edited by J. Prior. Brookfield, VT: Gower, 1994.
    24. Jacobs, R. L. "Impressions about the Learning Organization." Human Resource Development Quarterly 6, no. 2 (Summer 1995): 119-122.
    25. James C. Collins Jerry I. Porras, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, 1st ed, Harper Business,1994
    26. Jones and Hendry, C (1992), The Learning Organization: A Review of Literature and Practice, Human Resource Development Partnership.
    27. Kanter, R. M. (1990), When Giants Learn to Dance, London: Unwin Hyman.
    28. Karpin, D. (1995), Enterprising Nation, Report of the Industry Taskforce on Leadership and Management Skills, April, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
    29. Lesem, R. (1991), Total Quality Learning, Building a Learning Organization, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    30. Locke, E. and Jain, V. (1995), ``Organizational learning and continuous improvement'', International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 3 No. 1, January, pp. 45-68.
    31. Luthans, F., Rubach, M. and Marsnik, P. (1995), ``Going beyond total quality: the characteristics, techniques and measures of learning organizations'', International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 3 No. 1, January, pp. 24-44.
    32. Marquardt, M. and Reynolds, A. (1994), The Global Learning Organization, Irwin Professional Publishing, New York, NY.
    33. Mumford, A. (1991), ``Industrial and organizational learning'', Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 23 No. 6.
    34. Murrell, P. H., and Walsh, J. P. "Leadership Development at Federal Express Corporation." Human Resource Development Quarterly 4, no. 3 (Fall 1993): 295-302. (ERIC No. EJ 473 917)
    35. Nonaka, I. (1991), ``The knowledge-creating company'', Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 96-104.
    36. Paul Arveson, 1998, The Balanced Scorecard Institute
    37. Pedler, M, Boydell, T and Burgoyne, J (1988), Learning Company Project, Scheffield: Manpower Services Commission.
    38. Rylatt, A. (1994), Learning Unlimited: Practical Strategies and Techniques for Transforming Learning in the Workplace, Business and Professional Publishing, Sydney.
    39. Rummler, G.A. and Brache, A.P. (1995), Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart, 2nd edition, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
    40. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
    41. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, January-February 1996.
    42. Senge, P. The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday, 1990.
    43. Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: Heart and Practice of the Learning Organisation, Doubleday, New York, NY.
    44. Senge, P.M. (1992a), ``Building learning organizations'', Journal of Quality and Participation, Vol. 15 No. 2, March, pp. 30-8.
    45. Senge, P.M. (1992b), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Random House, Australia.
    46. Shiba, S. and Graham, A. (1993), ``Total quality management as a learning system'', The Center for Quality Management Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, Winter, Cambridge, MA, pp. 48-54.
    47. Sitkin, S., Sutcliffe, K. and Schroeder, R. (1994), ``Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: a contingency perspective'', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 537-64.
    48. Stacey, R. (1993), ``Strategy as order emerging from chaos'', Long Range Planning, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 10-17.
    49. Stata, R. (1989), Organizational Learning - The Key to Management Innovation, Sloan Sustainable Development, McGraw-Hill, London.
    50. Swieringa, J. and Wierdsma, A. (1992), Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham.
    51. Solomon, C. M. "HR Facilitates the Learning Organization Concept." Personnel Journal 73, no. 11 (November 1994): 56-66.
    52. Terziovski, M. (1998), Demystifying the Quality Confusion: Empirical Evidence and Lessons Learned, Consensus Books, Standards Australia, Sydney.
    53. Terziovski, M., Samson, D. and Dow, D. (1997), ``The business value of quality management systems certification: evidence from Australia and New Zealand, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-18.
    54. Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), ``Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches'', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 801-14.
    55. Watkins, K. and Golembiewski, R. (1995), ``Rethinking organizational development for the learning organization'', International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 3 No. 1, January, pp. 86-101.
    56. Watkins, K. E., and Marsick, V. J. Sculpting the Learning Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
    57. Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods Revised Edition). London: Sage [H62.Y56 ,ISBN 0-8039-3471-8(pbk)]
    58. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods(2nd Edition). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [H62.Yin HLRBR ,ISBN 0-8039-5662-2
    中文資料
    59. 光寶公司內部訓練資料,公開資訊, 1970~2007
    60. 飛利浦台灣品質月刊, 內部訓練資料, 1980~2004
    61. 許朝欽,「組織文化領導行為與員工工作態度間關係之實證研究-台灣某一商業銀行之個案研究」,朝陽大學工業工程與管理系碩士論文,2001
    62. 鐘志明,「業文化、員工工作價值觀及組織承諾之關聯性研究-以台灣地區主要集團企業為例」,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
    63. 陳延越,「國內企業推行6-Sigma品質管理系統之研究,元智大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文」,2002。
    64. 夏沛石,「企業導入6 Sigma的做法對績效之影響. 大同大學事業經營學系碩士論文」,2006
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    89355037
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089355037
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML171View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback