English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118693 (75%)
Visitors : 23572114      Online Users : 263
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127239


    Title: 臺日長照政策之比較制度分析研究
    A comparative institutional analysis of long-term care policies in Japan and Taiwan
    Authors: 山下仁心
    Yamashita, Hitomi
    Contributors: 陳敦源
    Chen, Don-Yun
    山下仁心
    Yamashita, Hitomi
    Keywords: 長期照護
    比較制度分析
    財務永續
    Long-term care
    Comparative institutional analysis
    Financial sustainability
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-11-06 15:32:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣已於2018年邁入高齡社會,長期照護之需求也日益增加,因此政府對於長照政策之擬訂完整性於穩定性也日益急迫,尤其財務面即重要課題之一環。由於日本可說是長照政策之先驅,且其高齡趨勢與台灣之未來預測極其相似,本研究以比較制度分析之方法分析且比較兩國政策之差異。為了以日本為借鏡加以建議台灣政府,本研究採深度訪談法並與臺日之政府機關、非營利組織、以及長照學者們進行訪談與討論。研究結果以政府結構、服務輸送、財務計畫、永續計畫等四個面向下去分析並整理出影響財務課題之元素與其建議方向。
    Taiwan has entered the aged society in 2018. The demand for long-term care has been increasing rapidly. In this way, it became more urgent for the government to implement robust policies especially in terms of financial issues. Since Japan initiated long-term care plans decades ago, also the situation in Japan is said as a reflection of Taiwan's future, this thesis compared the policies in both countries on the basis of Comparative Institutional Analysis. In order to come up with constructive suggestions, the research not only analyzed the publicly released data but also conducted the in-depth interviews with the governments, NPOs, and the scholars in Japan and Taiwan. The research came up with suggestions with regard to the aspects of governance structure, service delivery, finance scheme, and sustainability scheme that might be able to solve the issue of financial shortage when it comes to long-term care plans and pursue the goal of financial sustainability.
    Reference: Aoki, M., Greif, A., and Milgrom, P. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge: MIT press.
    Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research.
    Briggs, A. (1961). The Welfare State in Historical Perspective. European Journal of
    Sociology/Archives europeennes de sociologie, 2(2), 221-258.
    Campbell, J. C., & Ikegami, N. (2003). Japan’s radical reform of long-term care.
    Social Policy & Administration, 37(1), 21-34.
    Campell, J. C., Ikegami, N., & Kwon, S. (2009). Policy learning and cross-national
    diffusion in social long-term care insurance: Germany, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Policy Learning and Social Protection, 62, 63-80.
    Carspecken, P. F.(1996). Critical Ethnography in Educational Research. A Theoretical
    and Practical Guide. N.Y. : Routlege.
    Coase RA. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1-
    44
    Delmon, J. (2011). Public-private Partnership Projects in Infrastructure: An Essential
    Guide for Policy Makers. N.Y. : Cambridge University Press.
    Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content Analysis: Method, Application, and Issues. Health Care for Women International. 13(3), 313-321.
    ER. Babbie (2012). The Practice of Social Research-Wadsworth Publishing Company (13th ed.). California: Wadsworth Publication.
    Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (1996). After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a
    Global Economy. in Gøsta Esping-Andersen ed. Welfare State in Transition: National Adaptation in Global Economies. California: SAGE Publication.
    Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (1997). Hybrid or Unique: The Japanese Welfare State Between Europe and America. Journal of European Social Policy. 7(3). 179-189.
    Firth, R. (1951). Elements of Social Organization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Flora, P., & Heidenheimer, A. J. (1981). The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
    Gamble, A. (2016). Can the welfare state survive? Cambridge: Polity.
    Goodman, R. and Peng, I. (1996). The East Asian Welfare States. in Gøsta Esping-Andersen ed. Welfare State in Transition: National Adaptation in Global Economies. California: SAGE Publication.
    Gough, I. (2000). Welfare Regimes in East Asia and Europe. In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics Europe.
    Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.
    Hatano, Y., Matsumoto, M., Okita, M., Inoue, K., Takeuchi, K., Tsutsui, T., and Hayashi, T. (2017, April 27). The Vanguard of Community-based Integrated Care in Japan: The Effect of a Rural Town on National Policy. Retrieved June 20, 2018, from https://www.ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.2451/
    Hicks, A. M. (1999). Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. NY: Cornell University Press.
    Kayama, M. (2010). Local Government in Japan. Council of Local Authorities for International Relations. Japan
    Lu, P. (2017). Long-Term Care 2.0 in Taiwan- Respond to an Aging Society. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/ROC-MOHW/longterm-care-20-in-taiwan-respond-to-an-aging-society
    Malinowski, B. (1944). A Scientific Study of Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    Matsuda, R. (2018). The Japanese Health Care System. Retrieved January, 6, 2019, from https://international.commonwealthfund.org/countries/japan/
    Morel, N. (2006). Providing Coverage Against New Social Risks in Bismarckian Welfare States: The Case of Long-term Care. London, Routlegde.
    Morikawa, M (2014). Towards community-based integrated care: trends and issues in Japan’s long-term care policy. International Journal of Integrated Care, 14
    North DC. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Parsons, T. (1977). Social Systems and The Evolution of Action Theory (1st ed.). N.Y: Free Press.
    Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    Skocpol, T. (1995). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Taylor-Gooby, P. (2002). The Silver Age of The Welfare State: Perspectives on Resilience. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4). 597-621.
    Titmuss, R. (1968). Commitment to Welfare. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    Veggeland, N. (2016). The Current Nordic Welfare State Model. New York: Nova.
    Underdal, A. (1980). Integrated marine policy – What? Why? How? Marine Policy, 4(3). 159-169
    Whittaker, D. A. (2010). PFI, PPP Financial Modelling and Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Euromoney Institutional Investor.
    李青松, 林歐貴英, 陳若琳, 潘榮吉 (2010).老人與家庭. 台北:空大出版社
    李昭仁 (2016). 借鏡日本提升台灣再出發-第二次日本長期照護制度考察報告. 台灣醫界. 59(4), 9-13.
    林昱均 (2019). 財政部促參司明年推動台灣首件BOT長照機構案.中時電子報. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190606003162-260410?chdtv
    林惠君 (2016). 長照2.0版上路 財源從哪來?. 遠見雜誌. Retrieved June 13, 2017 from https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=34001
    洪美菁 (2013). 公共建設財務新策略¬- 推動政府購買公共服務型(PFI)促參計畫. 當代財政. 第030期. 77-78
    洪雯柔 (2009). 批判俗民誌:比較教育方法論. 台北:五南.
    孫克難 (2015). 民間參與公共建設之PFI模式探討-引進新制度經濟學觀點. 財稅研究. 44(5), 1-37.
    莊秀美 (2009). 從老人的類型與照顧需求 看「居家照顧」、「社區照顧」 及「機構照顧」三種方式的功能. 社區發展季刊. 第125 期. 177-194
    黃崇哲、洪美菁、陳珮琪 (2014). 未雨綢繆¬-由財政觀點看“長期照護服務”民間參與之可行性。財務研究, 43(2), 95-115.
    黃瑞琴 (1994). 質性教育研究. 台北:心理出版社.
    監察院. (2015). 日本老人福利機構考察報告. Retrieved August, 12, 2018, from https://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdUrl=./di/kpost/researchcase.asp&mp=1&ctNode=927&file_id=9940
    劉惠敏, 余志偉. (2017). 劉惠敏/長照2.0版正式上路,變得更好嗎?. Retrieved July, 8th,2017, from https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-long-term-care-version28.
    蔡宜臻. (2019). 超高齡社會的人行道體檢(下):PFI制度能否為公共建設之解方?. 聯合新聞網. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/12135/3579728
    蘇嘉瑞. (2018). 長照機構法人化,催化投資新藍海. 經濟日報. Retrieved Sept, 15th, 2019, from https://money.udn.com/money/story/10164/2971103
    衛生福利部 (2016).安定社會¬-長照2.0.2018年3月10號,取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-52541-f31f4409-f246-45c6-9a15-0b869807d70c.html
    衛生福利部 (2018).長照服務發展基金: 基金來源、用途及餘絀表
    薛如真 (2018). 小英的長照地圖財源靠機會稅。罩得住急遽老化的高齡台灣?. Retrieved January,12, 2019, from https://tw.news.yahoo.com/小英的長照地圖-財源靠機會稅-罩得住急遽老化的高齡台灣-025252416.html
    簡慧娟 (2017). 長照2.0新作為 前瞻、創新、整合¬- 老人社區照顧政策. 國土及公共治理季刊. 5(3rd). 114-121.
    全国知事会 (2019).国会知事ファイル. Retrieved June, 20th, 2019 from http://www.nga.gr.jp/
    岡沢憲芙,宮本太郎 (1997). 比較福祉国家論―揺らぎとオルタナティブ. 京都府: 法律文化社.
    厚生労働省 (2016). Long-term Care System of Japan. Retrieved January, 10, 2018, from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
    105266005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105266005
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901221
    Appears in Collections:[應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES) ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    600501.pdf4273KbAdobe PDF7View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback