English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23471288      Online Users : 231
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/126600


    Title: 平台生態圈發展與管理個案分析
    A case study on the development and management of platform ecosystem
    Authors: 陳欣郁
    Chen, Hsin-Yu
    Contributors: 邱奕嘉
    Chiu, Yi-Chia
    陳欣郁
    Chen, Hsin-Yu
    Keywords: 互補性
    平台
    生態系統
    Complementarity
    Platform
    Ecosystem
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-10-03 17:21:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去數十年來,五力競爭模型主導著產業分析,影響著企業的策略定位,然而,傳統的線性價值鏈逐漸被平台經濟模式取代,產業邊界逐漸模糊化,難以明確的定義與區分,越來越多企業選擇建立或轉型為平台型企業,進而發展為生態系統,因此,本研究的目的在於分析企業如何建構與鞏固生態系統,並透過分析騰訊音樂娛樂集團與KKBOX集團,驗證本研究提出之架構。

    本研究提出的架構,分為「樞紐集團」、「核心平台」、「附屬平台」三個部分,結合Helfat與Raubitschek提出的動態能力觀點以及Jacobides等學者提出之生態系統特徵,描述生態系統的價值創造過程。架構是以樞紐集團的視角進行分析,樞紐集團的動態能力,使其可以快速掌握市場動態、進行創新並整合資源,進而提出或調整生態系統策略;核心平台則是生態系統競爭優勢的主要來源,樞紐集團透過建立與核心平台具互補性之附屬平台進而發展成為生態系統,並透過附屬平台強化平台間的連結以鞏固該生態系統。
    Over the past few decades, the five-forces model has dominated industry analysis and influenced the strategic positioning of enterprises. However, the traditional linear value chain has gradually been replaced by the platform and the industrial boundaries have gradually become blurred, making it difficult to be defined and distinguished clearly. More and more companies choose to establish or transform into platform-based enterprises, and then develop into ecosystems.

    In order to analyze how companies construct and consolidate ecosystems, this study develope the architecture which is divided into three parts: “Hub group”、 “Core platform” and “Affiliated platform”by combining the dynamic capabilities theory and the ecosystem characteristics,and then verify it by analyzing “Tencent Music Entertainment Group” and “KKBOX Group”.

    The architecture is analyzed from the perspective of the Hub group. The dynamic capabilities of the Hub group enable it to quickly grasp market dynamics, innovate and integrate resources, and then adjust the ecosystem strategy. The Core platform is the main source of the competitive advantage of the ecosystem. The Hub group build an ecosystem through the establishment of Affiliated platforms that complement the Core platform, and strengthens the link between the platforms and the ecosystem.
    Reference: 參考資料

    文化部影視及流行音樂產業局. (2019). 106年流行音樂產業調查報告. 台北: 文化部影視及流行音樂產業局
    江小妍. (2017). 基于產業價值鏈視角的中國在線音樂產業商業模式研究. (傳媒經濟與管理 碩士論文), 北京印刷學院,
    艾瑞諮詢. (2019.03). 商業化的復興:中國數字音樂產業研究報告. Retrieved from http://report.iresearch.cn/report/201904/3353.shtml
    何佩珊. (2018). 不用虧錢法換用戶,KKBOX要用200萬會員數據抵禦串流市場價格混戰. Retrieved from https://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/42161
    吳定. (2003). 政策管理 (Vol. 1). 台灣: 聯經出版.
    易觀智庫. (2016). 場景白皮書2016. Retrieved from https://www.analysys.cn/article/analysis/detail/1000287
    唐子晴. (2018). 全娛樂時代來臨,149元聽歌、追劇雙享,KKBOX為什麼要「賠本」推出Prime服務?. Retrieved from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/50078/kkbox-prime
    莊于葶. (2014). 串流音樂產業之平台競爭策略:以 KKBOX 為例. 國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,
    許士軍. (1996). 定性研究在管理研究上的重要性. [The Importance of Qualitative Research in Management Research]. 中原學報, 24(2), 1-3. doi:10.6358/jcyu.199604.0001
    陳威如, & 余卓軒. (2013). 平台革命: 席捲全球社交, 購物, 遊戲, 媒體的商業模式創新. 台北市: 商周出版.
    葉至誠. (2000). 社會科學概論: 台北,揚智文化.
    騰訊音樂娛樂集團. (2018). 騰訊音樂娛樂集團招股書. Retrieved from https://ir.tencentmusic.com/sec-filings
    Adner. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure:An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. doi:10.1177/0149206316678451
    Adner, & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333.
    Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
    Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.
    Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Managements Review, 43(3), 51.
    Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285. doi:10.1002/smj.935
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
    Elberse, A. 許. (2013). 超熱賣商品的秘密. 台北市: 大塊文化.
    Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Retrieved from
    Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
    Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies became platform leaders. MIT Sloan Managements Review, 49(2), 28-35.
    Hagiu, A. (2009). Multi-sided platforms: From microfoundations to design and expansion strategies. (09-115).
    Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Managements Review 55(2), 92-93.
    Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47(8), 1391-1399.
    Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability [Press release]
    IFPI. (2018). Global Music Report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ifpi.org/news/IFPI-GLOBAL-MUSIC-REPORT-2018
    Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. doi:10.1002/smj.2904
    Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
    Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494-1504.
    Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). 平台經濟模式 (Vol. 1). 台北市: 天下雜誌股份有限公司.
    Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information systems research, 15(1), 37-59.
    Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.
    Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Lu, X., & Huang, L. (2015). The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: the digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba. com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(4).
    Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
    Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. doi:10.1002/smj.640
    Teece, D. J. (2017). Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy: Standards, Complementary Assets, and Business Models in the Wireless World. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
    Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54-62.
    Yin, R. K. (2001). 個案研究. 台北: 弘智文化.
    Yoo, B., Choudhary, V., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2007). Electronic B2B marketplaces with different ownership structures. Informs Management Science, 53(6), 952-961.
    Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2007). Dynamics of platform competition: Exploring the role of installed base, platform quality and consumer expectations: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    106364131
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364131
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901188
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    413101.pdf2632KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback