English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88531/118073 (75%)
Visitors : 23459056      Online Users : 192
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125962


    Title: 修正式紮根理論在商業的質性分析方法的應用
    Application of Modified Grounded Theory in Business Qualitative Analysis
    Authors: 沈廷翼
    Shen, Ting-Yi
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    沈廷翼
    Shen,Ting-Yi
    Keywords: 內容分析法
    紮根理論
    卡片分類法
    研究方法
    商業質性分析
    消費者行為研究
    Content analysis
    Grounded theory
    Card sorting
    Research method
    Business Qualitative Analysis
    Consumer behavior research
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 17:37:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在商業環境變化快速的現代,商業的質性分析方法亦需要更具有效率的分析方法,以貼近消費者的需求。本研究的目的有三:其一為探討紮根理論應用特性;其二為透過卡片分類法增加紮根理論在事例分類的效率;其三透過演繹法及聯想法相關類別,以達到詳盡的分析結果。
    本研究探討內容分析法、個案研究法、紮根理論等研究方法中,適用於修改的紮根理論方法的步驟,結合卡片排序方法,形成修正的紮根理論,建構一個可以從質性資料中,以標準化的分析過程,快速提取分析結果的方法。
    本研究使用自2017年10月至2018年2月蒐集的35位受訪者訪談的次級資料,並以抽樣標準選擇其中8個個案進行分析,用以比對傳統紮根理論與修正式紮根理論兩者的分析差異。
    修正式紮根理論納入卡片分類法,使編碼的內容得以運用摘句的字卡分類,達到傳統紮根理論的主軸編碼的效果,並由字卡上註記分析備忘錄的便利貼,可在分類的同時,重新檢視字卡分類的合理性,讓研究在找尋主軸的過程更為效率化,並在有限的經費與分析的時間內,完成最終的分析結論,並使分析歷程簡單化,讓研究者能輕易上手。
    整體而言,修正式紮根理論可使研究者,在少部分的減損分析結果的類別,卻大幅減少分析者認知負荷的前提下,使商業的質性分析方法能快速得到結論,以因應商業需要快速迭代的需求分析。
    In a modern and fast-changing business environment, business analytics also requires more efficient analytical methods for commercial use to understand the needs of consumers.
    The three purposes for this study including exploring the application characteristics of grounded theory, increasing the efficiency of grounded theory classification in cases through card sorting method, and diversifying categories and meeting exhaustive categories results by the deductive method and inductive method.
    The study explored the content analysis method, the case study method, and the grounded theory. The steps applied to the modified grounded theory method incorporates the card sorting method to form a modified grounded theory. This method focuses on constructing a modified method of quickly qualitative data analysis method which can extract the analysis results by a standardized analysis process.
    The study collected secondary data from 35 interviewees from October 2017 - February 2018. Then, it selected 8 out of 35 cases for analysis based on sampling criteria to contrast the result of the traditional grounded theory to the modified grounded theory.
    The card sorting method is incorporated into the modified grounded theory classifying the content of the code by the word card of the sentence achieving the effect of the axial coding of the traditional grounded theory.
    Marking the analysis memo on the sticky notes, which re-examine the cards classified into the right classification improves the efficiency of the main axis' searching process. Moreover, it completes the final analysis conclusion in the limited funding and analysis time. It is also easier for researchers to launch with the simplification of the process.
    Upon the whole, the modified grounded theory feats the use of fast-paced commercial changes. After all, it allows researchers to reach conclusions based on few categories impairment on analysis results, while significantly reducing the cognitive load of the researchers.
    Reference: 1.Berthelsen, C. B. Lindhardt, T., & Frederiksen, K. (2017). A discussion of differences in preparation, performance and postreflections in participant observations within two grounded theory approaches. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(2), 413-420.
    2.Charmaz, K. (1990). Discovering’chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11), 1161-1172.
    3.Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory In Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L,(eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. In: London: Sage.
    4.Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. Handbook of Constructionist Research, 1, 397-412.
    5.Charmaz, K. & Belgrave, L. L. (2007). Grounded theory. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 27-49.
    6.Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
    7.Corbin, J. Strauss, A. & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research. In: USA: Sage.
    8.Cunningham, G. B., Sagas, M., Sartore, M. L., Amsden, M. L., & Schellhase, A. (2004). Gender representation in the NCAA News: Is the glass half full or half empty? Sex Roles, 50(11-12), 861-870.
    9.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    10.Fincher, S. & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
    11.Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354.
    12.Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
    13.Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38.
    14.Glaser, B. G. (2016). Open coding descriptions. Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 108-110.
    15.Glaser, B. G. & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling Grounded theory. Paper presented at the Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
    16.Goulding, C. (1999). Consumer research, interpretive paradigms and methodological ambiguities. European Journal of Marketing, 33(9/10), 859-873.
    17.Heath, H. & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies.
    18.Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18.
    19.Locke, K. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 239-245.
    20.Martin, P. Y. & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141-157.
    21.Soranzo, A. & Cooksey, D. (2015). Testing taxonomies: beyond card sorting. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41(5), 34-39.
    22.Spencer, D. (2009). Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories: In USA :Rosenfeld Media.
    23.Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5-8.
    24.Turner, B. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and Quantity, 15(3), 225-247.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    106363102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1063631023
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900851
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    102301.pdf2067KbAdobe PDF11View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback