English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88645/118187 (75%)
Visitors : 23496192      Online Users : 301
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125914


    Title: 負資源轉換:瀨戶內海島嶼之隨創過程
    Conversion of Negative Resource: Bricolage Process within the Urban Regeneration of Setouchi's Islands
    Authors: 陳煥宏
    Chen, Huan-Hung
    Contributors: 蕭瑞麟
    Hsiao, Ruey-Lin
    陳煥宏
    Chen, Huan-Hung
    Keywords: 地域創生
    隨創
    機會辨識
    認知轉念
    資源轉換
    urban regeneration
    bricolage
    opportunity recognition
    cognitive shift
    resource conversion
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 17:28:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 組織的興起與衰敗類似一種生命循環。這樣的歷程似乎也體現在城市發展中。城市面臨衰退階段時,會衝擊居民生活,導致城市的沒落與滅亡。位於偏鄉的城市更是脆弱,創生過程會遇到頑固的抵抗、資源的匱乏、制約的束縛。本研究探討城市如何面對這些制約,並克服資源的限制,發展出地域創生的方案。本文以隨創的資源轉換為視角,分析偏鄉城市如何能突破資源有限的困境,讓城市得以找到重生機會。本研究強調於拓展隨創理論而探討三項「轉換」的做法:就地取材中如何找到轉機、將就著用中如何能夠轉念、資源重組前如何轉換資源價值。本研究追蹤日本「瀨戶內海藝術祭」在三個小島的發展過程,分析制約下如何重新辨識在地「負資源」、動員外部資源與「負資源」結合以及資源轉換意義與價值的作法。本研究點出,地域創生不只是推出藝術行銷方案那麼簡單,更重要的是理解其隨創作法,以便能於劣勢中捉住時機,改變頑固思維,並於制約下轉換資源性質。如此,城市於創生時就不會盲目地抄襲他人的「最佳實務」,而是能因地制宜地運用隨創觀念。於是,城市可飄逸轉身,使城市展現出個性化風貌。
    The rise and fall of organization always follow a circle of life. This journey also reflects the development of cities. When cities are decaying, they affect the life of citizens and expediting cities’ deterioration. The suburban cities are even more vulnerable; its regeneration will face stuborn resistance, shortage of resources and bounded by constraints. This research explores how suburban cities confront these constraints and overcome resource limitation while developing solutions to urban regeneration. This thesis employs the lens of bricolage and focuses on resource conversion in order to analyze suburban cities breakthrough resource scarcity and identify opportunities for urban reborn. This research aims to expand bricolage theory through three approaches to ‘conversion’: recognizing opportunity while making use of resource at hand; cognition shift while making-do with limited resources; converting the value of resources while recombingin them. This case study traces Setouchi Art Festival in Japan so as to analyze opportunity recognition, cognitive shift and resource conversion. This research describes not merely regeneration process but also analyzes bricolage through opportunity, cognition and resource. It indicates that urban regeneration should not be equated with marketing events packaged with art festivals, it is more important to appreciate bricolage practice in order to seize window of opportunity, reshape persistent mindset and convert the quality of resource within constraints. In so doing, urgan regeneration will not avoid replicating the ‘best practices’ and may exercise bricolage by adapting to local conditions. As such, cities may turnaround elegantly and illustrate its colorful personality.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    中澤康彥(汪平譯),2015,《一線員工成就一流企業:日本新經營之神星野佳路的飯店管理學》,台北市:遠見雜誌出版社。
    木下齊(張佩瑩譯),2017,《地方創生:小型城鎮、商店街、返鄉青年的創業十大鐵則》,新北市:不二家出版社。
    北川富朗(張玲玲譯),2014,《大地藝術祭:越後妻有三年展的10種創新思維》,台北:遠流出版社。
    安藤忠雄,2018,《安藤忠雄:建造屬於自己的世界》,北京:中信出版社。
    安藤忠雄,(褚炫初、王筱玲譯),2012,《安藤忠雄:我的人生履歷書》,台北市:聯經。
    西村幸夫(王惠君譯),1997,《故鄉魅力俱樂部:日本17個社區營造故事》,台北:遠流出版社。
    谷崎潤一郎(劉子倩譯),2016,《陰翳禮讚:幽寂美學的終極書寫》,新北市:大牌出版,遠足文化發行。
    岩佐十良(鄭舜瓏譯),2018,《地方創生x設計思考:里山十帖實戰篇》,台北:中衛出版社。
    松永安光、德田光弘、中橋惠、鈴木裕一、宮部浩幸、漆原弘、鷹野敦(林詠純譯),2018,《地方創生最前線:全球八個靠新創企業、觀光食文化,和里山永續打開新路的實驗基地》,台北市:行人出版社。
    林政逸、辛晚教,2009,「文化導向都市再生之策略模式:臺北市保安宮文化慶典與空間計畫的個案研究」,《都市與計劃》,第3期,第36卷,231-254頁。
    洪世章、周婉婷,2010,「整合式服務創新:台灣企業之比較個案研究」,《科技管理學刊》,第15期,第1卷,49-76頁。
    秋元雄史(林書嫻譯),2019,⟪直島誕生:地區再生X企業行銷X藝術實驗,從荒涼小島到藝術聖地的30年全記錄⟫,台北市:城邦文化出版。
    涂敏芬、洪世章,2012,「有中生有:工研院如何運用B.B.C.策略改造科專制度」,《管理學報》,第3期,第29卷,229-254頁。
    神尾文彥、松林一裕(王榆琮譯),2018,《地方創生2.0》,台北市:時報出版社。
    陳意文、吳思華、項維欣,2010,「資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造:以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例」,《科技管理學刊》,第2期,第15卷,1-20頁。
    彭康麟、洪碧怡、林明珠,2011,「逆境生存、創新思維─以節慶活動行銷幼教產業」,《產業管理評論》,第1期,第5卷,35-47頁。
    湯桂禎,2018,《美麗的制約:星野旅館集團如何以服務創新化劣勢為優勢》,政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程台商組碩士論文。
    福武總一郎、北川富朗,2017,《從直島啟航的賴戶內國際藝術祭—以藝術活化地方》,台北市:遠流。
    增田寬也(賴庭筠、李欣怡、雷鎮興、曾鈺珮譯),2019,《地方消滅:地方創生的理論起源》,台北市:行人文化實驗室。
    橫石知二(張凌虛譯),2009,《對了,就來賣葉子!樹葉變事業!你不知道的谷底成功術》台北市:高寶。
    蕭瑞麟,2016,《思考的脈絡:創新可能不擴散》,台北:天下文化出版社。
    蕭瑞麟,2017,《不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辨脈絡》,台北:五南學術原創專書系列。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬,2014,「劣勢創新:梵谷策展中的隨創行為」,《中山管理評論》,第2期,第22卷,323-367頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬,2017,「逆勢拼湊:化資源制約為創新來源」,《中山管理評論》,第1期,第25卷,219-268頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、蘇筠,2017,「逆強論:隨創式的資源建構過程」,《台大管理論叢》,第4期,第27卷,43-74頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳煥宏. 2019. 「負負得正:相依性如何促成負資源轉換」,《組織與管理》,第1期,第12卷,127-171頁。
    英文文獻
    Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. 2019. Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1): 96-121.
    Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. 2001. Technology-mediated learning - A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1): 1-10.
    Baker, T. 2007. Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5): 694-711.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
    Baker, T., Pollock, T. G., & Sapienza, H. J. 2013. Winning an unfair game: How a resource-constrained player uses bricolage to maneuver for advantage in a highly institutionalized field, Entrepreneurial Resourcefulness: Competing With Constraints. (Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 15), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 1-41. 
    Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
    Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. 2001. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6): 625–641.
    Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. 2011. Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film creams handle surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 239-261.
    Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) 1987. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Boje, D. M. 1991. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office- supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1): 106-126.
    Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34(3): 477-508.
    Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29(4): 593-616.
    Brannen, M. Y., Liker, J. K., & Fruin, W. M. 1998. Recontextualisation and Factory-to-factory Knowledge Transfer from Japan to the US: The case of NSK. In J. K. Liker, W. M. Fruin, & P. S. Adler (Eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 339-365.
    Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital.
    Callon, M. 1998. Actor-Network Theory - The Market Test. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After: Blackwell.
    Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open innovation: the New imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
    Codecasa, G., & Ponzini, D. 2011. Public-Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy. European Planning Studies, 19(4): 647-667.
    Dalpiaz, E., Rindova, V., & Ravasi, D. 2016. Combining Logics to Transform Organizational Agency: Blending Industry and Art at Alessi. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3): 347-392.
    Delmestri, G., & Greenwood, R. 2016. How Cinderella Became a Queen: Theorizing Radical Status Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4): 507-550.
    Dijk, M., de Kraker, J., & Hommels, A. 2018. Anticipating Constraints on Upscaling from Urban Innovation Experiments. Sustainability, 10(8).
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 63-82. Chicago and London.
    Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. 2010. Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 265-293.
    Eizenberg, E., & Cohen, N. 2015. Reconstructing urban image through cultural flagship events: The case of Bat-Yam. Cities, 42: 54-62.
    Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2011. Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. Organization Science, 22(5): 1240-1253.
    Ferilli, G., Sacco, P. L., Blessi, G. T., & Forbici, S. 2017. Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). European Planning Studies, 25(2): 241-258.
    Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2006. The sympbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decouping. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1173-1193.
    García, B. 2005. Deconstructing the city of culture: The long-term cultural legacies of Glasgow 1990. Urban Studies (Routledge), 42(5/6): 841-868.
    Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
    Garud, R., Lant, T. K., & Schildt, H. A. 2019. Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of Silicon Alley. Innovation-Organization & Management, 21(1): 187-213.
    Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. 2014. Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5): 1479-1492.
    Gertsen, M. C., & Zolner, M. 2012. Recontextualization of the corporate values of a Danish MNC in a subsidiary in bangalore. Group & Organization Management, 37(1): 101-132.
    Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
    Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84.
    Hargadon, A. 1998. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40(3): 209-227.
    Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-749.
    Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3): 476-501.
    Hommels, A. 2000. Obduracy and urban sociotechnical change: Changing Plan Hoog Catharijne. Urban Affairs Review, 35(5): 649-676.
    Hommels, A. 2005. Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science Technology & Human Values, 30(3): 323-351.
    Hutton, T. A. 2000. Reconstructed production landscapes in the postmodern city: applied design and creative services in the metropolitan core. Urban Geography, 21(4): 285-317.
    Hyde, C. A. 2018. Leading from below: Low-power actors as organizational change agents. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(1): 53-67.
    Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Välikangas, L. 2014. Opportunity creation in innovation networks: Interactive revealing practices. California Management Review, 57(1): 67-87.
    Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. 1977. Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946-1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2): 249-268.
    Kang, T. 2017. Bricolage in the urban cultural sector: the case of Bradford city of film. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(3-4): 340-356.
    Khaire, M. 2019. Entrepreneurship by design: the construction of meanings and markets for cultural craft goods. Innovation, 21(1): 13-32.
    Levi-Strauss, C. 1968. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lounsbury, M., Cornelissen, J., Granqvist, N., & Grodal, S. 2019. Culture, innovation and entrepreneurship. Innovation-Organization & Management, 21(1): 1-12.
    Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. 2019. Cultural entrepreneurship: A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 545-564.
    Lysgård, H. K. 2012. Creativity, culture and urban strategies: A fallacy in cultural urban strategies. European Planning Studies, 20(8): 1281-1300.
    McCarthy, J. D., & Wolfson, M. 1996. Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in the movement against drinking and driving. American Sociological Review: 1070-1088.
    McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6): 1212-1241.
    McGrath, R. G. 1995. Advantage from adversity: Learning from disappintment in internal corporate venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2): 121.
    Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
    Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2018. Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1): 26-45.
    Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. 1980. The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4): 491-500.
    Nappi-Choulet, I. 2006. The role and behaviour of commercial property investors and developers in French urban regeneration: The experience of the Paris region. Urban Studies, 43(9): 1511-1535.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 2010. Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: 23-33.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 2015. Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, D. Seidl, E. Vaara, & L. Rouleau (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2 ed.: 33-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 972-1001.
    Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. 2007. Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3): 313-320.
    Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. 2014. It's what you make of it: Founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5): 1406-1433.
    Powell, E. E., Hamann, R., Bitzer, V., & Baker, T. 2018. Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5): 623-642.
    Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. 2015. Frugal Innovation: How to do more with less: PublisAffairs.
    Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. 2011. A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22(2): 413-431.
    Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
    Rosso, B. D. 2014. Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies, 35(4): 551-585.
    Rouleau, L. 2015. Studying strategizing through biographical methods: narratives of practices and life trajectories of practitioners. In D. Golsorkhi, D. Seidl, E. Vaara, & L. Rouleau (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2 ed.: 462-476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Salignac, F., Galea, N., & Powell, A. 2018. Institutional entrepreneurs driving change: The case of gender equality in the Australian construction industry. Australian Journal of Management, 43(1): 152-169.
    Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
    Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. 2014. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2): 211-230.
    Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448-469.
    Sonenshein, S. 2017. Stretch: Unlock the power of less and achieve more than you ever imagined. New York: Harper Business.
    Sunduramurthy, C., Zheng, C., Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Rhyne, L. 2016. Doing more with less, systematically? Bricolage and ingenieuring in successful social ventures. Journal of World Business, 51(5): 855-870.
    Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2): 273-286.
    Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Busenitz, L. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1): 77-94.
    Teece, D. J. 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3).
    Teece, D. J. 2010. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 172-194.
    Tyre, M., & Orlikowski, W. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1): 98-118.
    Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. 2012. Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6: 285-336.
    Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. 2010. Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1): 73-86.
    Verdu-Jover, A. J., Alos-Simo, L., & Gomez-Gras, J. M. 2018. Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes. European Management Journal, 36(3): 330-340.
    Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
    West, J., & Bogers, M. 2014. Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4): 814-831.
    Witell, L., Gebauer, H., Jaakkola, E., Hammedi, W., Patricio, L., & Perks, H. 2017. A bricolage perspective on service innovation. Journal of Business Research, 79: 290-298.
    Wright, A. L., & Zammuto, R. F. 2013. Creating opportunities for institutional entrepreneurship: The Colonel and the Cup in English County Cricket. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1): 51-68.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research : design and methods: New Delphi, Newbury Park.
    Zaheer, S., & Rajan, R. 2003. Creativity under constraint: Technological imprinting and the migration of Indian business to the new economy. In B. Kogut (Ed.), The Global Internet Economy: MIT Press.
    Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. 2002. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3): 414-431.
    Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70-105.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    100359501
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359501
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901003
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    950101.pdf19630KbAdobe PDF28View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback