王國維倡導「二重證據法」影響近現代臺灣《詩經》與《尚書》研究甚深，此學界共知之事實。而傅斯年史學觀點受王國維啟發，且其史學思想與《詩》、《書》研究重點，更引導屈萬里先生的經學研究，此一脈絡，學界少見論述，本文即緣此深掘。本文擬欲深入探討的兩大問題為：第一、傅斯年的史學觀點，對王國維「二重證據法」的發展內涵，以及屈萬里先生對王、傅二人史料觀點與運用之發展。第二、傅斯年《詩》、《書》研究的核心重點及其思維，以及屈萬里先生對傅斯年之發展。經由本文論述，將欲勾勒出從王國維到傅斯年以迄屈萬里先生，在史料觀點與《詩》、《書》研究思維之傳承與發展之具體內涵，從而確立此一學術發展之過程與轉變。 The method of duplicate evidence advocated by Wang Guo Wei has a fundamental influence on the modern research of The Book of Songs and Documents of Antiquity in Taiwan. Inspired by Wang Guo Wei, Fu Si Nian's aspects of historical materials and his research emphasis of The Book of Songs and Documents of Antiquity have also guided Qu Wan Li's study of classics. This essay aims to examine this thread of thought which has not yet been discussed much. This essay first argues how Fu Si Nian's historiography is influenced by Wang Guo Wei's method of duplicate evidence, and how Wang and Fu's aspects of historical materials are applied in Qu Wan Li's research. It will also discuss the core emphasis of Fu's study of The Book of Songs and Documents of Antiquity that influences Qu Wan Li's research. To sum up, the purpose of this easy is to picture how the historical materials and the research thinking of The Book of Songs and Documents of Antiquity are passed down and developed from Wang Guo Wei to Qu Wan Li.