English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23482937      Online Users : 246
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119184


    Title: Mandatory Insurance or Mandatory Disclosure? A Reconsideration of the Legal Status of Accountant's Liability Insurance in Taiwan
    強制保險或強制揭露?我國會計師責任保險定位之再省思
    Authors: 陳俊元
    Contributors: 風管系
    Keywords: 會計師責任保險;律師責任保險;守門人;公司治理;強制保險;強制揭露;監督功能;信號功能;告知後同意;法人會計師事務所
    Accountant's Liability Insurance;Attorney's Liability Insurance;Gatekeeper;Corporate Governance;Mandatory Insurance;Mandatory Disclosure;Monitoring Function;Signaling Function;Informed Consent;Incorporated CPA Firm
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2018-08-03 17:16:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在從比較法觀點,釐清我國會計師責任保險之定位,並提出具體之立法建議。會計師具專業守門人之性質,如何在其責任與保護投資人間尋求平衡,甚為重要。首先,本文認為我國目前仍欠缺全面採取強制保險之正當性基礎。我國現行法僅要求法人會計師事務所強制投保,亦非妥適。再者,美國法在律師責任保險有關於強制保險與強制揭露兩大模型之辯論,且多數州採取強制揭露之方式,可供我國參考。由於兩種模式各有其優缺點,本文乃主張我國可採取綜合模式──基本上採取強制揭露,但在必要時適用強制保險之模式,如此也有助於責任保險監督與信號功能之發揮。最後,本文據此重新架構細部法律關係,並提出建議修正條文,以供後續研究與實務之參酌。
    This research aims to clarify the legal status of accountant’s liability insurance in Taiwan and provide legislative suggestions—from the prospective of comparative law. With the characteristics of gatekeeper, accountant is critical to the capital market and corporate governance, and thus that will be more important about how to balance the accountant’s liability and protection of investors. This paper first compares Taiwan with other jurisdictions, finding that there is no sufficient empirical evidence to support a complete mandatory insurance system in Taiwan. It is also improper for current Taiwan law to only requir the incorporated CPA firm for mandatory insurance. It is then proposed in this paper that the arguments about mandatory insurance and the preferred mandatory disclosure of attorney’s liability insurance in the U.S. may be also considered for accountant’s liability insurance for Taiwan. Since two models both have their pros and cons, this paper proposes the mixed model—mandatory disclosure—as the default rule, and mandatory insurance as the exception. The criteria should be able to reflect the liability risk, such as the type of business accountant engages, and not limited to the issue a firm is incorporated or not. This framework is also helpful for the monitoring and signaling function of accountant’s liability insurance. Finally, according to the framework proposed by this research, more detailed analyses and legislative recommendations are provided for research and practice in the future.
    Relation: 政大法學評論,152, 187-253
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202018030152004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202018030152004
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML111View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback