English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23481561      Online Users : 137
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119004


    Title: 2014年日本安倍首相解散眾議院之分析
    A Study on Prime Minister Abe’s Dissolution of the House of Representatives in 2014
    Authors: 吳明上
    Wu, Ming-Shan
    Keywords: 安倍政權;眾議院;解散權;安倍經濟學;選舉時機
    Abe regime;the House of Representatives;dissolution power;Abe economics;election timing
    Date: 2018-06
    Issue Date: 2018-07-27 15:01:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 日本首相握有解散眾議院的權力,眾議院解散後必然伴隨著眾議院的改選,而眾議院的多數勢力得以組閣執政,掌握國家龐大的政治資源。取得政權是政黨的最優先戰略目標,因此首相會選擇有利的時機解散眾議院。以往的研究指出,首相解散眾議院通常有先決條與最佳時機。但是,安倍首相於2014年11月宣布解散眾議院的狀況,不同以往,甚至安倍首相自身提出的以暫緩提升消費稅為解散的理由,對選民而言亦欠缺說服力。既然如此,安倍首相為何還是宣布解散眾議院?本文研究發現,除了安倍首相自身主張的理由外,安倍首相執意解散眾議院的真正目的有四:一是挽救內閣的支持率,二是牽制增稅勢力,三是推動安全保障相關法案,四是削弱在野勢力。
    The Japanese prime minister is empowered to dissolve the House of Representatives, which sets a stage for a general election that enables the parliamentary majority to form a new cabinet. The prime minister will choose a favorable opportunity to dissolve the House of Representatives in order to retain the regime. Previous studies have indicated that there are certain conditions and optimal timing for the prime minister to disband the House of Representatives. However, the dissolution announced by Prime Minister Abe on November 21, 2014 was different. Though Prime Minister Abe defended his decision for dissolution, his reasons were not persuasive to the voters. Thus, what is the underlying motive of Prime Minister Abe in disbanding the House of Representatives? This study answers with the following findings: 1) to shore up support for his cabinet, 2) to thwart tax-raising powers, 3) to promote security-related bills, 4) to weaken the political power of the opposing parties.
    Relation: 問題與研究季刊, 57卷2期, 39-58
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201806_57(2).0002
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.201806_57(2).0002
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    57-02.pdf1585KbAdobe PDF257View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback