English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88866/118573 (75%)
Visitors : 23552769      Online Users : 203
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/118031
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118031


    Title: The Conditional Suspended Sentences in Punitive Penal Climate
    緩刑的刑事政策意涵:嚴罰趨勢下的寬典
    Authors: 謝如媛
    Hsieh, Ju-Yuan
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 緩刑;附條件緩刑;有罪必罰;保護管束;義務勞務;監獄超收;替代措施;社會內處遇;刑罰權力
    suspended sentence;conditional sentence;absolute retributivism;probation;community service;prison over-crowded;alternatives to prison;net-widenning;penal control
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2018-06-26 17:19:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 緩刑向來被認為是一種刑罰的節制措施。由於刑罰之執行往往伴隨負面作用,對於沒有必要執行刑罰之人,若能給予緩刑,可讓行為人得以維持其家庭和社會關係,並避免標簽效應等刑罰的弊病。然而,近年來,隨著緩刑規定的修改,法官可在宣告緩刑的同時,要求行為人履行或遵守各種事項,使得緩刑在犯罪控制上的作用,實際上早已超越了節制刑罰的目的,而參雜了道德教化、懲罰、保安處分、滿足被害人等多重性質,並且,在有罪必罰的觀念與嚴罰化的社會氛圍下,此種修法使得緩刑反而成為擴張國家懲罰與控制權力的機制。本論文一方面比較國內外緩刑思潮與制度的發展,一方面觀察我國緩刑規定的演變、實務運作以及刑罰的現況,來分析緩刑目的與實踐之間的差距,從刑事政策的觀點指出緩刑規定與運用上的問題,並提供建議。
    The reform of Taiwan’s Criminal law in 2005, has introduced the conditonal suspended sentences as a solution to the oftnoted problem: the extraordinarily high incarceration rate for trivial offences. But it is unlikely that the Taiwanese judiciary will abandon over-night its historic reliance on imprisonment sentences. This paper analysed the practices of conditional suspended sentencing through judgment documents and interviews with judges, also analysed the data of conditonal suspended sentencing and the rate of imprisonment related. In conclusion, the new sentencing option seemed merely widen the net of penal control. It's because the failure of legislation, the values that rely on severe punishment, and related to these values, the sentencing judges-they treat conditional suspended sentences, not as an alternative to imprisonment but rather as a sanction in its own right. This paper also makes some suggestions about how to reform, and discussed the principles and limitations of conditonal suspended sentencing.
    Relation: 台大法學論叢, Vol.43, No.4, pp.1609-1664
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2014.43.04.04
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2014.43.04.04
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    16091664.pdf1474KbAdobe PDF237View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback