English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 81712/111165 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21223055      線上人數 : 626
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116681


    題名: Historical Narrative and Self Defense - Discrimination and Implication of the Rebellious Retainer- Zhang Jin-Yan's Advance and Retreat Decision Under the Regime Change
    歷史敘述與自我詮辯-「貳臣」張縉彥鼎革出處的辨析與意涵
    作者: 王學玲
    Wang, Hsueh-ling
    關鍵詞: 歷史敘述;自我詮辯;明清易代;貳臣;張縉彥
    historical narrative;self-defense;rebellious retainer;Zhang Jin-Yan
    日期: 2017-06
    上傳時間: 2018-03-30 16:38:29 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 明清易鼎,天崩地坼,士人殉死不降多令人動容,反之,貳臣進退失據經常受到非議。本文所論之張縉彥(1599-1670),以明季朝臣身分迎降李自成,繼之投效南明福王,終而歸順大清。弘光朝列張縉彥入「從逆諸臣」的第一等罪,《清史列傳》評之為貳臣,張縉彥則在詩文中,反覆剖明心志,形成歷史敘述與自我詮辯的極大歧異。張氏在易鼎之際的曲折出處經歷,與不斷詮辯自我的現象,說明清初貳臣群體同中有異,其中由弘光朝議處的「從逆諸臣」,就是特殊的一群。本文集中論述張縉彦在甲申都城破日與逃離北京後的遭遇、作為,重讀清初史冊、筆記與張縉彦的詩文奏疏,仔細比對二者敘述張縉彦鼎革出處的歧異內容。由此辨析歷史敘述的虛實成分、張縉彦自我詮辯是否具有効力,從而闡明此一歧異所具有的特殊意涵。其一,作為多重失節的文人,張縉彦等人大多重新編織、發明自己曾經殉而未死的過去,藉以擺脫心底的悔愧,展示重構的自我形象與存在意義。其二,張縉彥等人將自己的生命故事形諸文字,形成有別於他人的詮說話語,以期用「貳臣」之外的面目,公諸於人,流傳後世。以上二點,可說是自辯書寫對於張縉彥等貳臣的意義所在。最後,面對明清易代文人的自我詮辯與歷史敘述有所歧異,我們應該謹慎辨析,從而發掘其間的疑點與矛盾,並以結合歷史情境與個人生命的動態考察,抉發書寫主體深藏於論述裡的幽隱心事及其轉變。
    This text reexamines the historical books, records and the poetic memorials to the king from Zhang Jin-Yan, it focuses on his experiences and achievements after Jia-Shen defection and his exile from Beijing, and it also compares to the differences between these two descriptions. Via analyzing the authentic and the unreal parts in historical narrative, probing into the efficacy of Zhang's self-defense, and going to a step further expounding the special implication under the ambiguity. First, as a rebellious retainer, like Zhang and others, they always try to recompile, and make up and devise their unsuccessful suicide experience in the past in order to get rid of the regret and reconstruct their self-images and their existent values. Second, Zhang and others showed their life into words, and attempted to make it different from others. Furthermore, they anticipated to use the other identities besides the one of "rebellious retainer", and unrolled it to people and hand down to the next descendants. Based on these, here is the meaning of self-apology from the rebellious retainers. In conclusion, when facing to the differences of the historical narrative from the predecessors' self-defenses, we should differentiate punctilious, discover the suspicious points and the contradiction, combine the historical circumstances and personal development to expand the unknowns secrete in his mind and his transformation in his self-description.
    關聯: 東亞觀念史集刊, 12, 87-123
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.29425/JHIEA.201706_12.0004
    DOI: 10.29425/JHIEA.201706_12.0004
    顯示於類別:[東亞觀念史集刊] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML61檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋