English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88866/118573 (75%)
Visitors : 23566814      Online Users : 282
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/116627
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116627

    Title: Accessibility, Reasonable Accommodation and Non-Discrimination Principle: A Legal Review of Consistence between the CRPD and Equal Treatment Regulations in the Constitution and the Rights Protection Act for Persons with Disabilities in Taiwan
    Authors: 孫迺翊
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 身心障礙者權利公約;平等原則;不歧視;無障礙/可及性;合理調整;優惠性差別待遇
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities/CRPD;equal treatment;non-discrimination;barrier-free/accessibility;reasonable accommodation;affirmative action
    Date: 2016-11
    Issue Date: 2018-03-29 16:19:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 長久以來,我國身心障礙者權益保障法及相關法令政策只有禁止歧視,優惠性差別待遇及社會給付,缺乏對身心障礙者「平等參與社會」的想像,即便憲法增修條文強調國家應協助身心障礙者自立發展,也從未以「人權」的觀點來理解此項憲法委託,因此無論是個案適性協助或是無障礙環境,在法律規範上及法律解釋上仍停留在國家立法與行政裁量,現有法令亦未正視身心障礙者於私法關係中遭遇的障礙與歧視。本文探討身心障礙者權利公約的平等內涵與我國法律體系中的平等有何不同,並探討如何透過立法政策與合公約意旨的法律解釋方式,將該公約強調的事實上平等落實到我國法律體系。
    The Rights Protection Act for Persons with Disabilities and the concerning regulations and policies in Taiwan have long focused merely on non-discrimination, affirmative actions and social benefits. The right of persons with disabilities to equal participate in the society has never been taken seriously in law systems. Even according to the amendment article of the constitution in Taiwan, the state is obligated to realize the independent life of persons with disabilities, this norm has never been understood as their human rights. Accordingly the measures of accessibility in general and reasonable accommodations in individual cases which make the independence and autonomy of persons with disabilities possible fall into governmental discretions; also the discrimination and exclusion against persons with disabilities in private law have been insufficiently handled. This article aims to demonstrate the different models of equal principle, the de facto equality of CRPD on the one hand and the equality before law of the Article 7 of the Constitution in Taiwan on the other hand. This article is further conducted to analyze how to implement the model of de facto equality into the law systems in Taiwan by law reforms and legal interpretation in conformity with CRPD.
    Relation: 臺大法學論叢, 45卷S期, pp.1163-1228
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.02
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.02
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1163-1228.pdf1068KbAdobe PDF180View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback