English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88531/118073 (75%)
Visitors : 23457557      Online Users : 274
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115900
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115900


    Title: Promptly Insurance Payment, Dependency Clause in the Ancillary Agreement, and Principle of Good Faith - Comment on Taiwan High Court Civil Judgment Boaxian-Shan-Zi No.6 (2012)
    主動給付保險金、附約之效力依附條款與誠信原則--臺灣高等法院101年度保險上字第6號民事判決評釋
    Authors: 葉啟洲
    Yeh, Chi-Chou
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 保險金給付義務;全殘;終止契約;誠信原則;權利濫用;追加條款(附款)
    Insurance Payment Obligation;Total Disability;Cancel Contract;Principle of Good Faith;Abuse of Right;Rider
    Date: 2014-10
    Issue Date: 2018-02-07 14:25:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 保險事故發生後,保險人遲延給付保險金乃常有之事。相對於此,保險人主動給付保險金者,甚為少見。本文所評釋之臺灣高等法院101年度保險上字第6號民事判決事實,正為保險人主動給付保險金之情形。在該案中,保險人主動給付主約保險金,乃係為儘快終結其與被保險人之所有契約關係,以規避將來附約可能產生之鉅額醫療給付。另一方面,被保險人遲遲不請求主約保險金,則係希冀繼續維持契約關係存在,藉此享有附約所提供之醫療給付。從而雙方當事人皆有不誠信情事,如何評價其民事責任?本文將以民法誠信原則為中心,重新檢討本案主約與附約間契約效力之關聯。
    When insured event has been occurred, it's usual for insurer default on insurance payment. Instead, it's unusual for insurer to offer insurance payment promptly. The fact of Taiwan High Court Civil Judgment Boaxian-Shan-Zi No.6 (2012) commented by this article, shows that insurer promptly pays insurance payment. In that case, the insurer desires to end all contractual relationship with the insured, so she promptly pays master insurance policy's money for avoiding huge medical payment arising from rider. On the other hands, in order to keep contractual relationship with the insurer, if insured defaulted on master insurance policy claim, and then takes medical payment from rider. Consequently, both parties act in bad faith, she how to evaluate their civil liability? This article will reexamine the connection between master insurance policy and rider by principle of good faith.
    Relation: 法令月刊, Vol.65, No.10, pp.32-46
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6509%2fTLM%2f2014.6510.03
    DOI: 10.6509/TLM/2014.6510.03
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML195View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback