English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 81675/111165 (73%)
造訪人次 : 21208160      線上人數 : 423
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115479


    題名: 印尼軍事改革 (1998-2014)
    Navigating The Indonesia’s Military Reform, 1998-2014
    作者: 布羅托
    貢獻者: 孫采薇
    Sun, Tsai-Wei
    布羅托
    關鍵詞: 軍事政變
    民主化
    印尼
    軍工事務
    地緣政治
    Military reform
    Military’s withdrawal from politics
    Democratization
    Indonesia
    Democratic control over the armed forces
    Military business activities
    Territorial command structure
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2018-01-03 16:23:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This dissertation studies military’s withdrawal from politics. It examines military reform in Indonesia which aiming at withdrawing the Indonesian armed forces, currently known as Tentara Nasional Indonesia or TNI, from politics following the fall of Suharto in 1998. It seeks to explain the driving force of the progress of military reform in Indonesia and asks the question of: why has the reform been progressing differently from one agenda to another? It focuses on three agendas of reform, which are: the establishment of normative democratic control over TNI, the disbandment of TNI’s business activities, and the reorganization of TNI’s territorial command structure. It argues that variation in the progress of reform in those three agendas is closely related to military interests. The relatively successful establishment of normative democratic control over the armed forces has been mostly driven by the primacy of national interests within the brass, while the struggling disbandment of military’s business activities is rooted at factional/personal interests within TNI, and the complete failure in the abandonment of territorial command structure is related to strong organizational interests of TNI.
    This dissertation adopts a within-case comparison to answer the puzzle and focusing on Indonesia which represents the transplacement model of democratization in the third wave of democratization. Since transplacement involves coalition between reformers within the old and the new elites, it allows a process of negotiation in the transition. Hence, it creates a variation of the progress of the reform. Since this dissertation focuses on a single case studies, with three sub-cases, this dissertation is lacking of the power to generalization. However, it allows an in-depth analysis of the case using a process-tracing method. To conduct a proper process-tracing, this dissertation engages in various types of sources such as official documents, meetings’ notes, transcripts of in-depth interviews, personal communications, reports from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and secondary sources from newspapers’ reports.
    This dissertation concludes that the progress of the reform, in the case of Indonesia, varies according to the interests of the armed forces, and interaction between those interests and other variables such as the interests of civilian groups. It suggests that the organizational interests of the armed forces are the most influential variable to define the progress. Strong organizational interests would lead to a stall in the reform. The case of territorial command structure as well as, to a lesser degree, the second phase of the normative democratic control over the armed forces suggests this claim. In the absence of organizational interests, the existence of strong factional/personal interests would lead to problems in the advancement of the reform. The case of disbandment of military informal business activities supports this claim. Finally, the progress of the reform would be relatively smooth in the absence of those two interests and in the guidance of national interests.
    參考文獻: Books and Articles
    Ahmadi, A. (2015). Prajurit menggugat: kajian kritis pelaksanaan uji kepatutan dan kelayakan calon panglima TNI [Soldier appeals: critical analysis on the fit and proper test for Commander-in-chief]. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
    Akkoyunlu, K. (2007). ‘Military reform and democratisation,’ The Adelphi Papers, vol. 47, no. 392.
    Alagappa, M. (ed.). (2001). Military professionalism in Asia: conceptual and empirical perspectives. Honolulu: East-West Center.
    Anwar, DF. (2001). Negotiating and consolidating democratic civilian control of the Indonesian military. Honolulu: East-West Center.
    Aspinall, E. & Crouch, H. (2003). The Aceh peace process: why it failed. Honolulu: East-West Center.
    Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Azca, MN., et.al. (2004). Ketika moncong senjata ikut berniaga: laporan penelitian keterlibatan militer dalam bisnis di Bojonegoro, Boven Digul dan Poso [When the guns is involving in business activities: a report of military involvement in business activities in Bojonegoro, Boven Digul and Poso]. Jakarta: Kontras.
    Basuki, AY. (2007). Pola profesionalisasi militer dalam masyarakat [Military professionalization pattern in the society]. Depok: University of Indonesia.
    Basuki, AY. (2013). Reformasi TNI: pola, profesionalitas dan refungsionalisasi militer dalam masyarakat [The reform of the TNI: pattern, professionalism and refunctionalization of the armed forces in the society]. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor.
    Beach, D. & Pedersen, RB. (2016). Causal case study methods: foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching and tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Beeson, M. (2007). ‘Civil–military relations in Indonesia and the Philippines: will the Thai coup prove contagious?’ Armed Forces and Society, vol. 34 no. 3, pp. 474-490.
    Bennett, A. (2008). ‘Process tracing: a Bayesian perspective,’ in Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, HE. & Collier, D. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of political methodology, pp. 217-270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Bhakti, IN., et.al. (1999). Tentara yang gelisah: hasil penelitian Yipika tentang posisi ABRI dalam gerakan Reformasi [The restless army: Yapika’s research report on ABRI in Reform era]. Bandung: Mizan.
    Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies: explanatory research in small-n research. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. (2014). ‘Case studies and (causal-)process tracing,’ in Engeli, I, et.al (eds.). Comparative policy studies: conceptual and methodological challenges, pp. 59-83. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Borsuk, R. & Chng, N. (2014). Liem Sioe Liong’s Salim group: the business pillar of Suharto’s Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Bruneau, TC. & Tollefson, SD. (2006). Who guards the guardians and how: democratic civil-military relations. Texas: University of Texas Press.
    Bunbongkarn, S. (2013). ‘The armed forces and democratic development in Thailand,’ in Blair, D. (ed.). Military engagement: influencing armed forces worldwide to support democratic transition, Volume 2, pp. 165-187. Washington, DC.: The Brookings Institution.
    Bunte, M. & Ufen, A. (2009). Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia. New York: Routledge.
    Chandra, S. & Kanmen, D. (2002). ‘Generating reform and reforming generations: military politics in Indonesia’s democratic transition and consolidation,’ World Politics, vol. 55, pp. 96-136.
    Chauvel, R. & Bhakti, IN. (2004). The Papua conflict: Jakarta’s perceptions and policies. Honolulu: East-West Center.
    Chrisnandi, Y. (2004). Reformasi TNI: perspektif baru hubungan sipil-militer di Indonesia [The reform of TNI: a new perspective in civil-military relations in Indonesia]. Jakarta: LP3ES.
    Coast, J. (1952). Recruit to revolution: adventure and politics in Indonesia. London: Christophers.
    Colton, TJ. (1979). Commissars, commanders and civilian authority: the structure of Soviet military politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Cottey, A, Edmunds, T & Forster, A. (2001). ‘The second generation problematic: rethinking democracy and civil-military relations,’ Armed Forces and Society, vol. 29, pp. 31-55.
    Coughlan, EP. (1998). ‘Democratizing civilian control: the Polish case,’ Armed Forces and Society, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 519-533.
    Cribb, R. (1991). Gangsters and revolutionaries: the Jakarta people’s militias and the Indonesian revolution, 1945-1949. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    Croissant, A. (2004). ‘Riding the tiger: civilian control and the military in democratizing Korea,’ Armed Forces & Society, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 357-381.
    Croissant, A. & Bunte, M. (eds.). (2011) The crisis of democratic governance in Southeast Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Croissant, A., et.al. (2013). Democratization and civilian control in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Crouch, H. (1978). The army and politics in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Crouch, H. (2010). Political reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Daves, JH. (2013-2014). The Indonesian army from revolusi to reformasi. [Place of publication not identified]: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
    Decalo, S. (1976). Coups and army rule in Africa: studies in military style. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Desch, MC. (1999). Civilian control of the military: the changing security environment. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    Doorenspleet, R. (2000). ‘Reassessing the three waves of democratization,’ World Politics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 384-406.
    Dwipayana, A. & Ramadhan, KH. (1992). Soeharto: my thoughts, words, and deeds. Jakarta: Citra Lamtoro Gung.
    Feaver, PD. (1996). ‘The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control’, Armed Forces and Society, vol. 23, pp. 149-178.
    Feaver, PD. (1999) ‘Civil-military relations’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 2, pp. 211-241.
    Fitch, JS. (1998). The armed forces and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
    Finer, SE. (1962). The man on horseback: the role of the military in politics. Frederic A. New York: Praeger.
    Finer, SE. (1988). The man on horseback: the role of the military in politics. Boulder: Wesview Press.
    Forster, A., Edmunds, T., & Cottey, A. (2003). Soldiers and societies in postcommunist Europe: legitimacy and change. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Freedman, A. (2006). Political change and consolidation: democracy's rocky road in Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Gandhi, J. & Ruiz-Rufino, R. (eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of comparative political institutions. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
    Geddes, B., Wright, J. & Frantz, E. (2014) ‘Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: a new data set,’ Perspectives on Politics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 313-331.
    George, AL. & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
    Gerring, J. (2004). ‘What is a case study and what is it good for?’ The American Political Science Review, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 341-354.
    Gerring, J. (2017). Case study research: principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Haseman, JB. (2006). ‘Indonesian military reform: more than human rights issue,’ Southeast Asian Affairs, pp. 111-125.
    Heiduk, F. (2011). ‘From guardians to democrats? Attempts to explain change and continuity in the civil-military relations of post-authoritarian Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines,’ The Pacific Review, vol. 24, pp. 249-271.
    Heiduk, F. (ed.). (2014). Security sector reform in Southeast Asia: from policy to practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Heryanto, A. (2006). State terrorism and political identity in Indonesia: fatally belonging. London & New York: Routledge.
    Honna, J. (1999). ‘Military ideology in response to democratic pressure during the late Suharto era: political and institutional contexts,’ Indonesia, vol. 67, pp. 77-126.
    Honna, J. (2003). Military politics and democratization in Indonesia. Oxfordshire & New York: Routledge.
    Horowitz, DL. (1980). Coup theories and officers' motives: Sri Lanka in comparative perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Huntington, SP. (1957). The soldier and the state: the theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge: Belknap.
    Huntington, SP. (1961). ‘Interservice competition and the political roles of the armed services,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 40-52.
    Huntington, SP. (1968). Political order in a changing society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Huntington, SP. (1991-1992). ‘How countries democratize,’ Political Science Quarterly, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 579-616.
    Huntington, SP. (1993). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
    Janowitz, M. (1964). The military in the political development of new nations: an essay in comparative analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Janowitz, M. (1971) The professional soldier: a social and political portrait. New York: Free Press.
    Jenkins, D. (1983). ‘The evolution of Indonesian army doctrinal thinking: the concept of dwifungsi,’ Asian Journal of Social Science, vol. 11, pp. 15-30.
    Jenkins, D. (1984). Soeharto and his generals: Indonesian military politics, 1975-1983. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Jones, S. (2016). The expanding role of the Indonesian military. Jakarta: Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict.
    Kingsbury, D. (2003). Power politics and the Indonesian military. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
    King, G., Keohane, RO. & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Koh, CSL. (2016). ‘What next for the Indonesian Navy? Challenges and prospects for attaining the Minimum Essential Force by 2024,’ Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 432-462.
    Kuehn, D. & Lorenz, P. (2011). ‘Explaining civil-military relations in new democracies: structure, agency and theory development,’ Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 231–249.
    Kuehn, D, et.al. (2016). ‘Conditions of civilian control in new democracies: an empirical analysis of 28 ‘third wave’ democracies,’ European Political Science Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000011, published online: 19 February 2016.
    Kuncoro, M. (2009). Tranformasi Pertamina [The transformation of Pertamina]. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Galangpress.
    Kunkler, M. & Stepan, A. (ed.). (2013). Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Laksmana, E. (2008). Spoilers, partners, and pawns: military organizational behavior and civil-military relations in Indonesia. Singapore: RSIS.
    Laswell, HB. (1941). ‘The garrison state’, The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, pp. 45-468.
    Lebra, JC. (1975). ‘The significance of Japanese military model for Southeast Asia,’ Pacific Affairs, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 215-229.
    Lev, DS. (1963-1964). ‘The political role of the army in Indonesia,’ Pacific Affairs, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 349-364.
    Levy, JS. (2008). ‘Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference,’ Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 25, pp. 1-18.
    Lipjhart, A. (1971). ‘Comparative politics and the comparative method,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 65, pp. 682-93.
    Lee, T. (2000) ‘The nature and future of civil-military relations in Indonesia,’ Asian Survey, vol. 40, pp. 492-706.
    Lee, T. (2007). ‘Corporate interests and coups: the main reason for military intervention in Indonesia and the Philippines?” Armed Forces & Society, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 491-502.
    Lee, T. (2015). Defect of defend: military responses to popular protests in authoritarian Asia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Lorenz, P. (2015). Principals, partners and pawns: Indonesian civil society organizations and civilian control of the military. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg. Available online at http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/18730.
    Luttwak, E. (1968). Coup d’etat: practical handbook. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Mahoney, J. (2015). ‘Process tracing and historical explanation,’ Security Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 200-218.
    McCulloch, L. (2003). ‘Trifungsi: the role of Indonesian military in business,’ in Brommelhorster, J. & Paes, WC. (eds.). The military as an economic actor: soldier in business, pp. 94-123. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist challenges in Aceh and Papua: is special autonomy the solution? Honolulu: East-West Center.
    McGregor, KE. (2007). History in uniform: military ideology and the construction of Indonesia’s past. Singapore: NUS Press.
    McMahon, RB. & Slantchev, BL. (2015). ‘The guardianship dilemma: regime security through and from the armed forces,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 109, pp. 297-313.
    Mietzner, M. (2004). Indonesian civil-military relations: the armed forces and political Islam in transition, 1997-2004. Canbera: Australian National University.
    Mietzner, M. (2006). The politics of military reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: elite conflict, nationalism, and institutional resistance, Washington, DC.: East-West Center.
    Mietzner, M. (2008) ‘Soldiers, parties and bureaucrats: illicit fund-raising in contemporary Indonesia,’ South East Asia Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 225-254.
    Mietzner, M. (2009) Military politics, Islam, and the state in Indonesia: from turbulent transition to democratic consolidation. Leiden: KITLV Press.
    Mietzner, M. (ed.). (2011a). The political resurgence of the military in Southeast Asia: conflict and leadership. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
    Mietzner, M. (2011b). ‘Overcoming path dependence: the quality of civilian control of the military in post-authoritarian Indonesia,’ Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, pp. 270-289.
    Muna, R. (1999). ‘Persepsi militer dan sipil tentang dwifungsi [Military and civilian perception of dwifungsi],’ in Sukma, R. & Kristiadi, J. (eds.). Hubungan sipil-militer dan transisi demokrasi di Indonesia: persepsi sipil dan militer [Civil-military relations and transition to democracy in Indonesia: perspectives of civilian and military groups], pp. 35-59. Jakarta: CSIS.
    Muradi. (2014). Politics and governance in Indonesia: the police in the era of reformasi. New York: Routledge.
    Nainggolan, PP. (2011). The Indonesian military response to reform in democratic transition: a comparative analysis of three civilian regimes, 1998-2004. Freiburg: Freiburg University.
    Nordlinger, E. (1977). Soldiers in politics: military coups and governments. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Pantev, P (ed.). (2005). Civil-Military Relations and Democratic Control of the Security Sector. Sofia: Procon.
    Penders, CLM. & Sundhaussen, U. (1985). Abdul Haris Nasution: a political biography. St. Lucia: University of Queensland.
    Perlmutter, A. (1969). ‘The praetorian state and the praetorian army: toward a taxonomy of civil-military relations in developing polities,’ Comparative Politics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 382-404.
    Perlmutter, A. (1977). The military and politics in modern times: on praetorians, professionals, and revolutionary soldiers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Perlmutter, A. (1981). Political roles and the military rulers. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
    Przeworski, A., et.al. (2000). Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rabasa, A. & Haseman, J. (2002). The military and democracy in Indonesia: challenges, politics, and power. Santa Monica: RAND.
    Rieffel, L. & Pramodhawardani, J. (2007) Out of business and on budget: the challenge of military financing in Indonesia. Washington, DC.: The Brookings Institution.
    Rinakit, S. (2005). The Indonesian military after the New Order. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Robison, R. (1986). Indonesia: the rise of capital. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
    Robison, R. (2002). ‘What sort of democracy? Predatory and neoliberal agendas in Indonesia,’ in Kinnvall, C. & Jonnson, K. (eds.). Globalization and democratization in Asia: the construction of identity. New York: Routledge.
    Rohlfing, I. (2012). Case studies and causal inference: an integrative framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Ruland, J, Manea, MG & Born, H. (eds.). (2013). The politics of military reform: experiences from Indonesia and Nigeria. Berlin: Springer.
    Said, S. (1987). ‘The political role of the Indonesian military: past, present, and future,’ Asian Journal of Social Science, vol. 15, pp. 16-34.
    Said, S. (1991). Genesis of power: General Sudirman and the Indonesian military in politics, 1945-49. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Said, S. (2013). Dari Gestapu ke Reformasi: serangkaian kesaksian [From Gestapu to Reformasi: witness account]. Bandung: Mizan.
    Samego, I., et.al. (1998). Bila ABRI berbisnis [When ABRI is engaging in business activities]. Bandung: Mizan.
    Sarkesian, SC. (1981). ‘Military professionalism and civil-military relations in the West,’ in International Political Science Review, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 283-297.
    Sebastian, L. (2006). Realpolitik ideology: Indonesia’s use of military force. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Scheer, B. (2013). Moving beyond ambitions? Indonesia’s military modernisation. Canberra: ASPI.
    Singh, B. (2000) ‘Civil-military relations in Indonesia: change amidst continuity,’ Armed Forces & Society, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 607-633.
    Staniland, P. (2008). ‘Explaining civil-military relations in a complex political environment: India and Pakistan in comparative perspective,’ Security Studies, vol. 17, pp. 322-362.
    Stepan, A. (ed.). (1971). Authoritarian Brazil: origins, policies and future. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Stepan, A. (1973). The military in politics: changing patterns in Brazil. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Stepan, A. (1988). Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. New Jersey & West Sussex: Princeton University Press.
    Sukma, R. (2004). Security operations in Aceh: goals, consequences, and lessons. Honolulu: East-West Center.
    Sukma, R. (2006). ‘Kajian kritis terhadap Undang-Undang no. 3/2002 tentang pertahanan negara [Critical assessment on the Law no. 3/2002 on state defense],’ in Prihartono, TH. (ed.). Penataan kerangka regulasi keamanan nasional [The framework for arrangement of national security regulation], pp.17-32. Jakarta: Propatria Institute.
    Suparman, D. (2013). Jejak kudeta [On the step of coup d’etat]. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas Gramedia.
    Syailendra, EA. (2016). ‘Inside Papua: the police force as counterinsurgents in post-reformasi Indonesia,’ Indonesia, vol. 102, pp. 57-83.
    Thee, KW. (2012). Indonesia’s economy since independence. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Trinkunas, H. (1999). Ensuring democratic civilian control of the armed forces in Asia. Honolulu: East West Center.
    Trinkunas, H. (2000). ‘Crafting democratic control of the armed forces,’ Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 43, pp. 77-109.
    Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Wardhani, A. & Widjajanto, A. (2004). Hubungan intelijen-negara, 1945-2004 [Interaction between the state and intelligence agency, 1945-2004]. Jakarta: Pacivis.
    Waldner, D. (2015). ‘Process tracing and qualitative causal inference,’ Security Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 239-250.
    Wardoyo, B. (2016). ‘Establishing civilian control over the armed forces,’ Jurnal Global & Strategis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153-167.
    Webber, D. (2006). ‘A consolidated patrimonial democracy? Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia,’ Democratization, vol. 13, pp. 396-420.
    Welch, Jr., CE. & Smith, AK. (1974). Military role and rule. North Scituate: Duxbury Press.
    Welch, Jr., CE. (ed.). (1976). Civilian control of the military. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Wibisono, AA., Wardoyo, B. & Kurniawan, Y. (2008). Satu dekade reformasi militer di Indonesia [A decade of military reform in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Pacivis.
    Widoyoko, D., et.al. (2003). Bisnis militer mencari legitimasi [Military business is seeking for legitimacy]. Jakarta: ICW.
    Widjajanto, A. (2007). ‘Transforming Indonesia’s armed forces,’ UNISCI discussion paper, no. 15.
    Widjajanto, A, et.al. (2008). Indonesia military reform, 2009-2014. Jakarta: Pacivis.
    Widjajanto, A. (2010). ‘Evolusi doktrin pertahanan Indonesia [The evolution of Indonesia’s defense doctrine],’ Prisma, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3-20.
    Widjajanto, A. (2013a). ‘Indonesia’s military doctrinal stagnation,’ Strategic Review. Available online at: http://www.sr-indonesia.com/web-exclusives/view/indonesia-s-military-doctrinal-stagnation.
    Widjajanto, A. (2013b). Transformation of Indonesia’s military doctrine. Jakarta: University of Indonesia.
    Yin, RK. (2014). Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
    Yunanto, S., et.al. (2005). Evaluasi kolektif reformasi sektor keamanan di Indonesia: TNI dan Polri [Collective evaluation of Indonesia’s security sector reform: TNI and Polri]. Jakarta: The RIDEP Institute.


    Documents
    Kementerian Pertahanan (2003, 2008, 2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan (White Defense Paper). Jakarta.
    Kementerian Pertahanan (2016). Doktrin Pertahanan Negara (National Defense Doctrine). Jakarta.
    Kementerian Pertahanan (2006). Kebijakan Umum Pertahanan Negara 2005-2017 (National Policy in Defense Affairs, 2005-2017). Jakarta.
    Mabes ABRI (1998). Paradigma Baru ABRI (The New Paradigm of ABRI). Bandung. Paper resulted from meetings at Sesko ABRI.
    Mabes TNI (2001).TNI Abad XXI (TNI in the Twenty-first Century). Jakarta.
    Propatria Working Groups minutes of meetings and consultations from 2000-2004.
    Government regulations (UU, Perppu, Perpres, Keppres, Kepmenhan, SP Panglima, and others).
    Tim Nasional Pengalihan Bisnis TNI (2008). Laporan Tim Pelaksana Pengalihan Bisnis TNI (Final Report of National Team for the Takingover of TNI Business). Jakarta.

    Newspapers
    Antara (online)
    Kompas
    Koran Sindo
    Koran Tempo
    Republika
    The Jakarta Post
    Vivanews (online)
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
    104265506
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104265506
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS) ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    550601.pdf1669KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋