English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 82519/111667 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21452728      線上人數 : 706
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114304


    題名: 政治引渡及其對雙邊安全關係的影響 : Fethullah Gülen的引渡
    Political extraditions and their impact on bilateral security relations : the extradition of Fethullah Gülen
    作者: 費力克
    Poleo, Felix Jose
    貢獻者: 盧業中
    Lu, Yeh-Chung
    費力克
    Felix Jose Poleo
    關鍵詞: 引渡
    安全
    合作
    法圖拉·葛蘭
    土耳其
    美國
    Extradition
    Security
    Cooperation
    Fethullah Gulen
    Turkey
    United States
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-11-01 14:32:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文旨在通過運用羅伯特·阿克塞爾德(Robert Axelrod)提出的合作理論,對政治引渡和土耳其與美國的雙邊安全關係的研究做深入探討。 至今,關於引渡的學術研究大部分都聚焦在其法律影響上。與此相反,本論文則側重於引渡對雙邊安全關係的影響。除此之外,本論文也將土耳其的國內政治壓力納入研究,用以解釋本論文研究案例之法圖拉·葛蘭(Fethullah Gülen)引渡請求背後隱藏的真正動機。本論文對土耳其正義發展黨(AKP)於2002年上臺後至2017年9月期間的雙邊安全關係進行詳細研究。
    對安全關係的分析表明,美國可能拒絕土耳其對法圖拉·葛蘭這一引渡請求的負面影響是由所謂的戰略夥伴關係的不穩定和脆弱性造成的。然而,儘管該負面影響以及土美安全關係的對話雙方對該事件的不同感知有導致外交關係斷絕的可能,本論文的觀點是土美安全關係會因為對兩國未來相互作用的期待而繼續保持。引渡的後果反覆運算特性和兩國在安全事項中依然存在相互依存關係也激勵兩國繼續合作。另外,本文也通過分析對伊朗國王以及愛爾蘭叛亂成員的引渡請求——前者導致外交關係斷絕而後者沒有——來比較請求國與被請求國間的利益衝突。此外,對土耳其總理雷傑普·塔伊普·埃爾多安(Recep Tayyip Erdoğan)及其政府在2016年7月15日政變之後咄咄逼人地尋求引渡法圖拉·葛蘭所倚仗的國內壓力的分析也展現了法圖拉·葛蘭能夠獲得政治罪犯庇護的原因。同時,這也表明了對美國的威脅被用於操控引渡程式,並被用作政治權宜之計。為了避免有罪不罰現象以及仇恨的延續,本文作者建議應用Aut Dedere Aut Judicare原則來避免當葛蘭根據美國法律被判有罪而逃避懲罰的情況發生。作者知道,這只是一個嘗試性的分析,因為關於這個事件的決定還沒有出臺.

    關鍵詞:引渡,安全,合作,法圖拉·葛蘭(Fethullah Gülen),土耳其,美國。
    This thesis aims at augmenting and contributing to the study of political extraditions and Turkey-US bilateral security relations through the lenses of Cooperation Theory proposed by Robert Axelrod. Regarding extradition, most researches have focused on the legal implications. Contrarily, this thesis focuses on the implications on bilateral security relations. Moreover, the domestic political pressures of Turkey are also included to depict the real motives behind the extradition request of Fethullah Gülen, which is the case subject of study. This thesis investigates the bilateral security relations since the Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey came into power from 2002 to September of 2017.
    The analysis of the security relations shows that negative impact the possible denial of this extradition is caused due to the instability and fragility of what was once called a strategic partnership. Despite the negative impact of a possible denial of Turkey’s request to extradite Fethullah Gülen from the United States and the perception by different interlocutors of Turkey-US security relations that it can lead to a break of diplomatic relations, this thesis argues that their security relationship will continue based on the expectations of future interactions. Both, the iterated characteristic of extraditions and the still existence of interdependence in security matters provide for incentives to continue their cooperation. In addition, the extradition requests of the Iranian Shah and that of the members of the Irish Insurgency are also examined to provide a comparison of conflict of interests between the requesting and requested states, one that led to the break of diplomatic relations and one that did not. Moreover, in regards to the analysis of the domestic pressures that motivated Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his government to aggressively seek the extradition of Fehtullah Gülen in the aftermath of July 15, 2016 coup d’état, it shows why he can be protected under the political offense exception. Furthermore, it shows that the threats to the United States have been used to manipulate the extradition process and for political expediency. In order to avoid impunity and the continuance of animosity, the application of the principle Aut Dedere Aut Judicare is recommended if Gülen is found guilty of crimes also punishable in the United States. The author is aware that this is a tentative analysis since a decision on the matter has yet to be made.
    Key Words: Extradition, Security, Cooperation, Fethulllah Gülen, Turkey, United States.
    參考文獻: Bibliography
    Books
    Akdogan, Yalcin. 2006. “The Meaning of Conservative Democratic Political Identity.” In The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party, edited by M. Hakan Yavuz, 49-65. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
    Aksin, Sina. 2007. Turkey from Empire to Revolutionary Republic: The emergence of the Turkish Nation from 1789 to present. New York: New York University Press.
    Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
    Ayan Musil, Pelin. 2011. Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Barnett, Michael N. 1996. “Identity and Alliances in the Middle East.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Wise, Edward Martin.1995. Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law. Dordrecht and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
    Bilge Criss, Nur. 2007. “Turkish Perceptions of the United States.” In what they think of US: International Perceptions of the United States since 9/11, edited by David Farber. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Bilge Criss, Nur. 2011. “The American Cold War Military Presence in Turkey.” In American Turkish Encounters: Politics and Culture, 1830-1989, edited by Selcuk Esenbel, Nur Bilge Criss, Tony Greenwood, Louis Mazzari, 281-299. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Biron, Henry Chartres, and Chalmers, Kenneth E. 1981. The Law and Practice of Extradition. Littleton, CO: F.B. Rothman.
    Candar, Gengiz. 2000. “Some Turkish Perspectives on the United States and American Policy toward Turkey.” In Turkey’s Transformation and American Policy, edited by Morton Abramowitz. New York: Century Foundation Book.
    Cevik, B. Sene, and Seib, Philip, eds. 2015. Turkey’s Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
    Finkel, Andrew. 2012. Turkey: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Fuller, Graham E. 2014. Turkey and the Arab Spring – Leadership in the Middle East. Istanbul: Bozorg Press.
    Grotius, Hugo. 2001. On the Law of War and Peace. Edited by A.C. Campbell. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
    Hahn, Peter L. 2005. Crisis and Crossfire: The United States and the Middle East since 1945. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
    Hale, William. 1997. “Turkey,” in The Cold War and the Middle East, edited by Yezid Sayigh and Avi Shlaim. Oxford: Claredon Press.
    Hall, William Edward, and Higgins, Pearce. 1924. A Treatise on International Law, 8th edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Harrington, James C. 2011. Wrestling with Free Speech, Religious Freedom, and Democracy in Turkey: The political trials and times of Fethullah Gülen. Lanham, Maryland: United Press of America.
    Hendrick, Joshua D. 2013. Gülen: The Ambiguous Politics of Market Islam in Turkey and the World. New York: New York University Press.
    Hibbard, Scott W., and Little, David. 1997. Islamic Activism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington D.C.: United Stated Institute of Peace.
    Ismael, Tareq, and Aydin, Mustafa, eds. 2003. Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century: A Changing Role in World Politics. Burlington: ASHGATE.
    Jenkins, Gareth. 2006. “Symbols and Shadow Play: Military-JDP Relations, 2002-2004.” In The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party, edited by M. Hakan Yavuz, 185-206.Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
    Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Khalilzad, Zalmay, Lesser, Ian O., and Larrabee, Stephen. 2000. The Future of Turkish-Western Relations- Toward a Strategic Plan. Santa Monica: Center of Middle East Public Policy.
    Koyuncu, Berrin. 2007. “Globalization, Modernization, and Democratization in Turkey: The Fethullah Gülen Movement.” In Remaking Turkey: Globalization, Alternative Modernities, and Democracy, edited by E. Fuat Keyman, 153-168. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    Kuru, Ahmet T. 2006. “Reinterpretation of Secularism in Turkey: The Case of the Justice and Development Party.” In The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party, edited by M. Hakan Yavuz, 136-159.Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
    Larrabee, F. Stephen. 2008. Turkey as a U.S. Security Partner. Santa Monica and Arlington: RAND Corporation -Project Air Force.
    Nachmani, Amikam. 2003. Turkey: facing a new millennium- Coping with intertwined conflicts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    Nicholls, Clive, Montgomery, Clare, and Knowles, Julian. 2007. The Law of Extradition and Mutual Assistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Oktem, Ketem, Kadioglu, Ayse, and Karli, Mehmet, eds. 2012. Another Empire? A Decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press.
    Ostrom, Elinor, and Walker, James, eds. 2003. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York: Russell Foundation. Volume IV.
    Ozcan, Mesut. 2008. Harmonizing Foreign Policy: Turkey, the EU and the Middle East. Padstow: Ashgate.
    Pieper, Mortiz. 2015. “Turkey’s Iran Policy: A case of Dual Strategic Hedging.” In Politics and Foreign Policy in Turkey- Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Kilic Bugra Kanat, Ahmet Selim Tekelioglu, and Kadir Ustun, 107-130. Ankara: Young Scholars on Turkey- SETA.
    Sadik, Giray. 2009. American Image in Turkey: U.S. Foreign Policy Dimensions. Lahnham: Lexington Books.
    Sambei, Arvinder, and Jones, John R. W.D 2005. Extradition Law Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Shearer, Ivan Anthony. 1971. Extradition in International Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    Solomon Richard H., and Quinney, Nigel. 2010. American Negotiating Behavior: Wheeler-dealers, Legal Eagles, Bullies, and Preachers. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
    Standbrook, Ivor, and Standbrook, Clive. 2000. Extradition Law and Practice, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Szaz, Michael. 1978. “NATO, Turkey and U.S. Strategy;” Haley, Normal R. “The Role of Turkey as a NATO Partner;” Lemnitzer, Lyman L. “The Defense of NATO’s Southeastern Flank and the Turkish Arm Embargo;” in NATO, Turkey and the United States Interests. Washington D.C.: American Foreign Policy Institute- Studies on NATO Defense Policies.
    Tocci, Nathalie, and Walker, Joshua W. 2012. “From Confrontation to Engagement: Turkey and the Middle East.” In Turkey & Its Neighbors: Foreign Relations in Transition, edited by Ronald H. Linden et. al., 35-60. Boulder Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    Tugal, Cihan. 2016. The Fall of the Turkish Model: How Arab Uprising Brought Down Islamic Liberalism. London: VERSO.
    Yavuz, M. Hakan. 2003. “The Gülen Movement: The Turkish Puritans.” in Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement, edited by M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.


    Articles/ Reports/ Theses
    1981. The Iran Hostage Crisis a Chronology of Daily Developments, Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, (March).
    2009. “Rebuilding a Partnership: Turkish-American Relations for a New Era- A Turkish Perspective”, Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association (TÜSİAD), No-T/2009-04/490 (April): 11-90.
    Albright, Madeleine K., and Hadley, Stephen J. 2012. “U.S.-Turkey Relations: A New Partnership”, Council on Foreign Policy- Independent Task Force, Report No. 69.
    Alessandri, Emiliano. 2011. “Turkey and the United States,” In Turkey’s Global Strategy, ed. Nicholas Kitchen, London School of Economics- IDEAS (May): 45-49.
    Altunisik, Meliha Benli. 2011. “Turkish Foreign Policy in the 21st Century,” CIDOB International Yearbook- Barcelona Center for International Affairs, 195-199.
    Arbell, Dan. 2014. “The U.S.-Turkey-Israel Triangle,” Center for Middle East Policy at Bookings, no. 34, (October):1-48.
    Aslan, Ali. 2012. “Performing Turkey: Continuity and Change in Turkish Statecraft, 1990-2012,” University of Delaware, (summer).
    Aydintaşbaş, Asli, and Kirişci, Kemal. 2017. “The United States and Turkey- Friends, Enemies, or Only Interests.” Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings, No. 12, (April): 1-21.
    Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1969. “Ideologically Motivated Offenses and the Political Offense Exception in Extradition - A Proposed Juridical Standard for an Unruly Problem.” DePaul Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 217-259.
    Boyd, Lyn. 2000. “A King’s Exile: The Shah of Iran and Moral Considerations in U.S. Foreign Policy,” Institute for the Study of Diplomacy of Georgetown University.
    Brody, Reed. “Chad: The Victims of Hissène Habré Still Awaiting Justice”, Human Rights Watch, (July 12).
    Cantrell, Charles L. 1977. “The Political Offense Exemption in International Extradition: A Comparison of the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland,” Marquette Law Review, Vol. 60, No.3, 777-818.
    Cafarella, Jennifer, Sercombe, Elizabeth and Charles Vallee. 2016. “Partial Assessment of Turkey’s Post-Coup Attempt Military Purge,” Institute for the Study of War, (July30).
    Cebeci, Rabia Anne.1988. “International Extradition Law and the Political Offense Exception: The Traditional Incidence Test as a Workable Reality,” Loyola International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 3.
    Cohen, Ariel. 2013. “Obama’s Best Friend? The Alarming Evolution of Us-Turkish Relations.” The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, No. 100 (May).
    Garcia-Mora, Manuel. 1962. “The Nature of Political Offenses: A Knotty Problem of Extradition Law,” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 7, 1226-1257.
    Harrington, James C. 2015. “Turkey Democracy in Peril- A Human Rights Report,” (May).
    Isa, Afacan. 2001. "Turkish-American Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, 1990-2005," FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
    Jeffrey, James F., and Cagaptay, Soner. 2017. “U.S. Policy on Turkey,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, No. 27, (January): 1-8.
    Karagöz, Murat. 2004 – 2005. "US Arms Embargo against Turkey - after 30 Years: An Institutional Approach towards US Policy Making", Center for Strategic Research (SAM), (winter):107-130.
    Oye, Kenneth. 1985. “Cooperation Under Anarchy,” World Politics, Vol. 38 (October)
    Lauterpacht, E. 1962. “The Contemporary Practice of the United Kingdom in the field of International Law,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly - Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7, No. 3 (July).
    Milner, Helen. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies.
    Milner, Milner. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation: Strengths and Weaknesses,” World Politics – Cambridge University Press, Vol. 44.
    Moore, John Bassett. 1911. “The Difficulties of Extradition.” The Academy of Political Science Vol. 1, No. 4, (July): 625-634.
    Petersen, Antje C. 1992. "Extradition and the Political Offense Exception in the Suppression of Terrorism." Indiana Law Journal, Vol.67, no. 3, 767-796.
    Phillips, Christopher. 2011. “Turkey and Syria,” In Turkey’s Global Strategy, ed. Nicholas Kitchen, London School of Economics- IDEAS (May): 34-39.
    Posner, Eric, and Goldsmith, Jack L. 1999. "A Theory of Customary International Law." University of Chicago Law Review 1113, No. 66.
    Seufert, Günter. 2014. “Is the Fethullah Gülen Movement Overstretching Itself? A Turkish Religious Community as a National and International Player,” German Institute for International and Security Affairs, No. 2 (January): 5-31.
    Sternberg, Kenneth S., and Skelding, David L. 1983. “State Department Determinations of Political Offenses: Death Knell for the Political Offense Exception in Extradition Law,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, 131-171.
    Van Den Wijngaert, Christine.1983. “The Political Offense Exception to Extradition: Defining the Issues and Searching a Feasible Alternative.” Report presented at the International Seminar on Extradition, International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Sciences, (June).
    Warner, David P. 2005. “Challenges to International Law Enforcement Cooperation for the United States in the Middle East and North Africa: Extradition and Its Alternatives.” Villalona Law Review, Vol. 50, no. 3, 479-508.
    Weitz, Richard. 2014. “Turkey’s New Regional Security Role: Implications for the United States,” Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, (September): 1-151.
    Werz, Michael, and Hoffman, Max. 2016. “The Process behind Turkey’s Proposed Extradition of Fethullah Gülen.” Center for American Progress, (September 7).
    Zanotti, Jim. 2011. “Turkey-U.S. Defense Cooperation: Prospects and Challenges,” Congressional Research Service, (April, 8)
    Zanotti, Jim. 2013. “Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations,” Congressional Research Service 32, (December,20).
    Legal Documents
    619. Extradition Hearing, United State Department of Justice- Offices of the United States Attorneys, https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-619-extradition-hearing
    Código Procesal Penal de la Nación. Ley N° 23.984. Promulgada: 4 de setiembre de 1991. Argentina.
    Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field. (Geneva, 12 August 1949).
    Divisional Court. In Re Castioni. [1891] 1 Q.B. 149. http://uniset.ca/other/cs4/18911QB149.html
    European Convention on Extradition, 1957.
    European Union Convention on simplified Extradition within the European Union, 1995.
    European Union Convention on the substantive requirements for Extradition within the European Union, 1996.
    Hague Convention for the suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft. No. 12325. (United Nations treaty. 1970).
    International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency (Geneva: League of Nations, April 20, 1929).
    Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. 540 (1840), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/39/540/case.html
    List of Extradition Treaties of the United States up to 2002. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/s/l/treaty/faqs/70138.htm
    Organization of American States Convention on Extradition, 1933.
    Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, (United Nations, 1961).
    Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between The United States of America and the Republic of Turkey, January 1, 1981, 32 U.S.T. 311.
    Valentine v. United States ex rel. Neidecker, 299 US. 5,9 (1936), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/299/5/

    News Articles
    1979. “A Transcript of President's News Conference on Foreign and Domestic Matters; Opening Statement.” The New York Times, January 18.
    1979. “Iran Likely to Demand Extradition of the Shah.” The New York Times, February 17.
    1979. “Iran Seeks to Extradite Shah.” The Washington Post, February 18.
    1981. “Why Carter Admitted the Shah.” The New York Times, May 17.
    2002. “Transcript of President Bush's first State of the Union address, delivered to Congress.” CNN, January 29.
    2011. “Senegal: Habré Trial an ‘Illusion.” Human Rights Watch, June 9.
    2011. “Turkey imposes economic sanctions on Syria.” BBC News, November 30.
    2016. “Biden calls on Turkey to be patient in Gülen case.” U.S. News, August 24.
    2016. “How is U.S. a partner if it continues to harbor Gülen? Erdoğan asks.” Daily Sabah, August 2.
    2016. “Kerry hopes for continuity in Turkey amid coup reports.” Associated Press, July 15.
    2016. “Pentagon sees role for Turkey in Mosul battle.” Al Arabiya News, October 21.
    2016. “Turkey military purge harming fight against Is¬lamic State: Clapper.” Reuters, July 28.
    2017. “Turkey extends its NATO mission in Afghanistan” Anadolu Agency, January 3.
    2017. Russia, Turkey, Iran Discuss Syria Ceasefire in Astana.” Aljazeera News, February 6.
    2017. “Turkey to extend state of emergency by three months,” Aljazeera, April 18.
    2017. “Turkey will not extradite suspects wanted by the West unless they extradite Gülenists: Erdoğan,” Hurriyet Daily News, May 30.
    2017. “US must at least give Gülen house arrest: Turkish Deputy PM,” Hurriyet Daily News, July 18.
    2017. “Turkey set to buy Russian missile defence system,” Aljazeera, September 12.
    2017. “Russia, Turkey, Iran agree borders of de-escalation zone in Syria's Idlib – Anadolu,” Reuters, September 15.
    2017. “Give us Gülen if you want arrested pastor Andrew Brunson to be freed: Erdoğan tells US,” Hurriyet Daily News, September 28.
    Amanpour, Christiane. 2003. “Turkey rejects U.S. troop proposal,” CNN, March 2.
    Barnard, Anne, and Yeginsu, Ceylan. 2016. “Erdoğan says Turkey Would Join U.S. to fight ISIS in Raqqa, an ISIS Bastion in Syria.” The New York Times, Sept 7.
    Belhumeur, Jenna. 2017. “Court upholds life sentence of Chad's Hissene Habre.” Aljazeera, April 28.
    Cevallos, Danny. 2016. “After failed Turkey coup, must U.S. extradite cleric?” CNN, July18.
    Dewan, Angela, Frederik Pleitgen and Faith Karimi. 2017. “Presidents of Turkey, Russia huddle against backdrop of Syrian war,” CNN, March 10.
    Dewan, Angela, and Swails, Brent. 2016. “Ex-Chad dictator sentenced to life for war crimes.” CNN, May 30.
    Diamond, Jeremy, Schneider, Jessica, and Johns, Joe. 2017. “Trump transition knew of Flynn's pro-Turkey lobbying before White House appointment”, CNN, March 11.
    Dombey, Daniel. 2010. “US issues arms-deal ultimatum to Turkey,” Financial Times, August 16.
    Esra Tur, “Collapse of Turkey’s Egypt and Syria policies under Davutoğlu.” Turkish Review, 2016, 26-33.
    Fox, Kara, McLaughlin, Eliott C., and Masters, James. 2017. “Turkey referendum: Erdoğan declares victory,” CNN, April 17.
    Hemming, Jon. 2012. “Turkey Does Not Want Return to Iraq Chaos: Minister.” Reuters, January 18.
    Jones, Dorian. 2017. “Putin Heads to Turkey as Ties Rapidly Thaw,” VOA, September 27.
    Keinon, Herb. 2013. “Netanyahu Apologizes to Turkey over Gaza Flotilla.” The Jerusalem Post, March.
    Landay, Jonathan. 2017. “Kurdish independence vote damages U.S. efforts to preserve unified Iraq,” Reuters, September 27.
    Pamuk, Humeyra. 2017. “Turkey sets out Raqqa operation plans to U.S.: report.” Reuters, February 18.
    Reinl, James. 2016. “US-Turkey military fissures could damage anti-Islamic State efforts.” Middle East Eye, August 1.
    Sly, Liz. 2017. “U.S. military aid is fueling big am¬bitions for Syria’s leftist Kurdish militia.” The Washington Post, January 7.
    Solaker, Gulsen. 2014. Turkey's Erdoğan calls on U.S. to extradite rival Gülen, Reuters April 29.
    U.S Department of State. Bureau of Public Affairs. Daily Press Briefing, July 19, 2016 [Press release]. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2016/07/260261.htm
    U.S Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs. Daily Press Briefing, August 23, 2016, [Press release]. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2016/08/261220.htm#TURKEY3
    Weymouth, Lally. 2013. “Turkish President Abdullah Gül: Assad Must Go.” The Washington Post, September 23.
    Yavuz, Ercan. 2010. “Israeli-caused instability makes its way to Turkey’s security document.” Today’s Zaman, October 29.

    Others
    Defense Expenditures of NATO Countries (2009-2016), July 4, 2016, NATO. http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2016_07/20160704_160704-pr2016-116.pdf
    Exclusive – “Interview with exiled cleric Fethullah Gülen,” Interview conducted by Philip Crowther and Leela Jacinto. France 24 English [Youtube-Online], July 18, 2017.
    Interview with the German Intelligence Chief Bruno Kahl. Interview conducted by Martin Knobbe, Fidelius Schmid and Alfred Weinzierl, “Coup in Turkey was just a welcome pretext,” Spiegel Online, March 20, 2017.
    See list of Sanctions, “Syria Sanctions,” U.S. Department of State https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/syria/
    “Turkey’s PKK Conflict: The Rising Toll.” The International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.be/interactives/turkey/
    U.S Department of State, Office of The Historian. Telegram from the Department of State to the Embassy in Turkey, June 5, 1964, [Telegram]. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v16/d54
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際研究英語碩士學位學程 (IMPIS)
    104862009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104862009
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    200901.pdf1262KbAdobe PDF92檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋