English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 75046/106105 (71%)
造訪人次 : 19440382      線上人數 : 450
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112723


    題名: 臉書使用與科學公眾參與: 一般大眾與科學臉書粉絲專頁使用者之比較
    Facebook use and public participation in science: a comparison between the general public and users of a science Facebook fan page
    作者: 吳承穎
    Wu, Cheng Ying
    貢獻者: 施琮仁
    Shih, Tsung Jen
    吳承穎
    Wu, Cheng Ying
    關鍵詞: 臉書
    公眾參與
    社群網站
    Facebook
    Public participation
    Social networking sites
    Science communication
    Self-efficacy
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-09-13 15:04:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Social networking sites (SNSs) nowadays serve as important platforms for
    users to engage in public affairs. This study applied the O-S-O-R model to examine
    the relationship between Facebook and public participation in science and the
    mediating role of users’ scientific knowledge and self-efficacy. Besides, this study
    examined the relationship mentioned above by utilizing data collected from two
    different populations - the general public and the users of the Facebook fan page
    “Pansci.com,” the biggest scientific online group in Taiwan.
    Based on a total sample size of 1,960, the result showed that scientific use of
    Facebook increased scientific knowledge only for “Pansci.com” users. Besides,
    scientific use of Facebook is positively associated with self-efficacy and public
    participation in science in both samples. It is noteworthy that the effect of scientific
    use of Facebook on self-efficacy is stronger for “Pansci.com” users but the effect of
    self-efficacy on public participation in science is stronger for general users. In
    addition, self-efficacy serves as a significant mediator in the relationship between
    scientific use of Facebook and public participation in science in both samples.
    參考文獻: Agha, S. (2003). The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception,perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS care, 15(6),749-762.
    Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y. H., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploringthe motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 304-311.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press,1998).
    Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.
    Barker, V., Dozier, D. M., Weiss, A. S., & Borden, D. L. (2013). Facebook “friends”: Effects of social networking site intensity, social capital affinity, and flow on reported knowledge-gain. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(2).
    Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48.
    Bowen. R.M., Bassler. B., Bienenstock. A., David. R., …, Wilson. M.B. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. NSB 14-01. National Science Foundation.
    Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/front/front.pdf
    Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2014). Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them. Public Understanding of Science, 23(4), 376-394.
    Chiang, S.L., & Chang, Y.C. (2016). More democratic Science communication:Exploring the role of science museums engaging the public with science. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(1), 199-227.
    Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research, 11(4), e48.
    Chopyak, J., & Levesque, P. (2002). Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society, 24(1), 155-166.
    Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2008). New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2(21), 771-791.
    Do, M. P., & Kincaid, D. L. (2006). Impact of an entertainment-education television drama on health knowledge and behavior in Bangladesh: an application of propensity score matching. Journal of health communication, 11(3), 301-325.
    Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public understanding of science, 5(3), 183-204.
    Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:”Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
    Eveland Jr, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359-386.
    Eveland Jr, W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political communication, 17(3), 215-237.
    Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224.
    Facebook. (2017). Facebook Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results. Accessed March 13, 2017, from
    https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2016/Q4/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2016-Results.pdf.
    Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
    Holbert, R. L. (2005). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22(4), 447-461.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell
    research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171-192.
    InsightXplorer. (2016, July 15). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usageㄡ Retrieved from http://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20160715.pdf
    InsightXplorer. (2017, July 17). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usage.Retrieved from
    http://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekl
    y%20Report_20170717.pdf
    Jennings, M. K. (1996). Political knowledge over time and across generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 228-252.
    Joly, P. B., & Kaufmann, A. (2008). Lost in translation? The need for ‘upstreamengagement’with nanotechnology on trial. Science as Culture, 17(3), 225-247.
    Jung, N., Kim, Y., & de Zúniga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge andefficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430.
    Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113-126.
    Kroll, A., Neshkova, M. I., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). Spillover Effects From Customer to Citizen Orientation: How Performance Management Reforms Can Foster Public Participation. Administration & Society. Advance online publication.
    Kurath, M., & Gisler, P. (2009). Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio-and nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 559-573.
    Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronic
    media, 50(2), 173-192.
    Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608-630.
    Lanzerotti, L.J., Benbow, C.P., Bruer, J.T., Clough, G.W., …, Pomeroy. J.M. (2010).Science and engineering indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/front.pdf
    Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Americans’ actions to limit global warming, November 2013. Yale University and
    George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
    McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland Jr, W. P., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H.(1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23(2), 179-209.
    McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communications effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215–235). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12(1), 3-33.
    McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political communication, 16(3), 315-336.
    Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. (2014). Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689-700.
    Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778.
    Paek, H. J. (2008). Mechanisms through which adolescents attend and respond to antismoking media campaigns. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 84-105.
    Pi, S. M., Chou, C. H., & Liao, H. L. (2013). A study of Facebook Groups members'knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1971-1979.
    Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 191-210.
    Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., & Fortman, K. K. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34-49.
    Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2008). Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: What would it really take?. Science Communication, 30(1), 126-136.
    Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: Facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 325-342.
    Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology &
    behavior, 11(2), 169-174.
    Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012, October 19).
    Social media and political engagement. Retrieved from
    http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/
    Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C., & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks: Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. Environmental
    Education Research, 17(4), 553-575.
    Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, technology & human values, 25(1), 3-29.
    Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political
    Communication,, 21(3), 315-338.
    Scherman, A., Arriagada, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2015). Student and environmental protests in Chile: The role of social media. Politics, 35(2), 151-171.
    Shah, D. V., Kwak, K, & Holbert, R. L. (2001). " Connecting" and" disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.
    Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extendingthe communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4),676-703.
    Shen, F., Wang, N., Guo, Z., & Guo, L. (2009). Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of Internet use in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 451-476.
    Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4), 676-703.
    Shih, T.J. (2016). Social media and public participation: a uses and gratifications research on the Facebook of Pansci.tw. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(2), 209-241
    Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329.
    Taiwan Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2017). The Number of Undergraduate Students: according to subject. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/result.aspx?qno=MQA5ADkA0
    Tait, J. (2009). Upstream engagement and the governance of science. EMBO reports, 10(1S), 18-22.
    Tian-Tzer, Jeng, Heng-Li, Yang, Li-Shya, Chen, Cheng-Wen, Hu, Qian-feng, Liu, & Min-An, Zheng. (2016, September 20). A Survey on Broadband Internet Usage in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20160922d.pdf
    Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1183-1194.
    Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
    Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299-314.
    Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456-474.
    Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3), 107-114.
    Vraga, E. K., Anderson, A. A., Kotcher, J. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Issue-Specific Engagement: How Facebook Contributes to Opinion Leadership and Efficacy on Energy and Climate Issues. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 200-218.
    Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381-395.
    Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,16(4), 362-369.
    Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London, England: Demos.
    Wohn, D. Y., Lampe, C., Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2011, February 08-11). Coordinating the ordinary: social information uses of Facebook by adults. Paper presented at the 2011 iConference. doi: 10.1145/1940761.1940808
    Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and
    behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    102461006
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024610061
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    006101.pdf586KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋