English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23481727      Online Users : 160
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/112273
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112273


    Title: 使用者採用共享平台的因素:交易成本及價值觀點
    Why People Use a Sharing Economy Platform: A Transaction Cost and Valued-based Perspective
    Authors: 侯曉琪
    Hou, Hsiao Chi
    Contributors: 梁定澎
    林怡伶

    Liang, Ting Peng
    Lin, Yi Ling

    侯曉琪
    Hou, Hsiao Chi
    Keywords: 共享經濟
    價值接受模式
    交易成本
    認知價值
    參與意圖
    Sharing economy
    Value-based model
    Perceived value
    Transaction cost
    Intention
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-28 13:38:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 共享經濟為近幾年廣為討論的議題之一,本研究欲以Uber、Airbnb等媒合共享服務類型的網路平台,探討使用者採用共享平台的相關因素為研究方向,從價值觀點出發,考量使用者認知犧牲及認知效益,以交易成本作為採用共享平台服務所認知的犧牲,又將認知的效益分為經濟效益與非經濟效益兩種影響層面,來綜合評估使用者對於整體共享產品服務的認知價值,透過認知價值進而探討影響使用者採用共享平台的參與意圖。其中,交易成本又會受到不確定性和資產特殊性所影響。
    本研究將共享平台提供的產品及服務假設五種情境,共收集476份有效問卷樣本回收分析,研究結果發現,使用者採用共享平台時認知的交易成本越低或使用者認知利益越大時,獲得的認知價值越高。其中又以認知效益對於價值感受的影響程度又比使用者認知所做出的犧牲更強。
    Sharing economy is an emerging trend with rapid growth. Many firms such as Uber and Airbnb have taken advantage of the sharing platform to provide innovative services. However, many more have failed after a substantial amount of investment. Not much research has conducted with regard to why consumers chose to use some sharing services but not others. In this research, the value-based perspective and the transaction cost theory are adopted to build a research model for explaining users’ intention to accept a sharing platform. In our model, transaction costs of using the sharing platform is considered as a sacrifice, while economic and non-economic benefits are the benefit side of the model. Uncertainty and asset specificity are considered two main factors that affect the transaction cost.
    A questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate the research model. A total of 476 responses were received. SmartPLS3.0 was used to analyzed the data. The results indicate that perceived value is negatively affected by the transaction cost and positively affected by benefits gained from the platform. Perceived value has a significant effect on users’ intention to adopt a service provided on a sharing platform.
    Reference: Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car
    sharing. Journal of consumer research, 39(4), 881-898.
    Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
    Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law Journal, 273-358.
    Böcker, L., & Meelen, A. A. H. (2016). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series, 16(02), 1-22.
    Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What's mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live, Harper Collins, New York.
    Carson,G. (2014). Five key sharing economy sectors could generate £9 billion of
    UK revenues by 2025. Retrieved from: http://pwc.blogs.com/press_room/2014/08/five-key-sharing-economy-sectors-could-generate-9-billion-of-uk-revenues-by-2025.html.
    Cheng, D. (2014). Is sharing really caring? A nuanced introduction to the peer economy. Report of the Open Society Foundation Future of Work Inquiry.
    Chang, T. Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 22(1), 16-27.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
    Cohen, B., & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279-296.
    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 307-319.
    Felson, M. & Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 614-624.
    Gallarza, M. G., & Saura, I. G. (2006). Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: an investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism management, 27(3), 437-452.
    Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059.
    Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2001, January). Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. In System Sciences, 2001. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 9-pp). IEEE.
    Heinrichs, H. (2013). Sharing economy: a potential new pathway to sustainability. Gaia, 22(4), 228.
    Henten, A. H., & Windekilde, I. M. (2016). Transaction costs and the sharing economy. info, 18(1), 1-15.
    Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325-344.
    Hotel News Now (2015). The 2015 Big Brands Report, Retrieved from: www.hotelnewsnow.com/media/File/PDFs/Misc/BIG%20BRANDS%20REPORT%202015_compressed.pdf
    Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 43(1), 111-126.
    Kim, J., Yoon, Y., & Zo, H. (2015). Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: A Social Exchange Perspective. In PACIS (p.76).
    Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin.
    Liang, T. P., & Huang, J. S. (1998). An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: a transaction cost model. Decision support systems, 24(1), 29-43.
    Matzler, K., Veider, V., & Kathan, W. (2015). Adapting to the sharing economy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 71.
    Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 193-207.
    Motala, M. (2016). The" Taxi Cab Problem" Revisited: Law and Ubernomics in the Sharing Economy. Banking & Finance Law Review, 31(3), 467.
    Munger, M. C. (2016). Tomorrow 3.0: the sharing economy. The Independent Review, 20(3), 391.
    Owyang, J., Samuel, A., & Grenville, A. (2014). Sharing is the new buying: How to win in the collaborative economy. Vision Critical/Crowd Companies.
    Parsons, J. (2010). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 7(1).
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Puschmann, T., & Alt, R. (2016). Sharing economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 93.
    Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
    Roostika, R. (2012). Mobile internet acceptance among university students: A value-based adoption model. IRACST-International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT),, 2(2).
    Sundararajan, A. (2013). From Zipcar to the sharing economy. Harvard Business Review, 1.
    Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
    Teo, T. S., & Yu, Y. (2005). Online buying behavior: a transaction cost economics perspective. Omega, 33(5), 451-465.
    Tussyadiah, I. P. (2016). Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 70-80.
    Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
    Williamson ,O.E.(1975). Markets and Hierarchies : Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York, NY, 1975
    Williamson ,O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, NY, 1985.
    Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative science quarterly, 269-296.
    Williamson, O. E., & Winter, S. G. (Eds.). (1993). The nature of the firm: origins, evolution, and development. Oxford University Press, USA.
    Wu, L. Y., Chen, K. Y., Chen, P. Y., & Cheng, S. L. (2014). Perceived value, transaction cost, and repurchase-intention in online shopping: A relational exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2768-2776.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
    Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2014). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    104356031
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104356031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    603101.pdf1187KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback