English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71578/104447 (69%)
造訪人次 : 19157087      線上人數 : 473
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/112161
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112161


    題名: 企業社會責任與銀行成本效率之關係 ──兩階段資料包絡分析法
    Does CSR influence the cost efficiency of banking industry? The data envelopment analysis
    作者: 黃旭寧
    貢獻者: 黃台心
    黃旭寧
    關鍵詞: 規模效率
    技術效率
    成本效率
    資料包絡分析
    企業社會責任
    Tobit迴歸模型
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-08-28 11:28:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究試圖了解銀行業承擔企業社會責任(CSR)的程度與其經營效率是否相關,使用兩階段的研究方法。第一階段經營效率的部分,運用資料包絡分析法(DEA),評估從2010年至2014年,來自19個國家共114間銀行的經營績效。企業社會責任指標,根據英國道德投資研究服務公司(EIRIS)的問卷資料,轉換成分數,分數越高的銀行,從事企業社會責任的程度越深。第二階段用Tobit迴歸模型,探討第一階段求得之經營效率與企業社會責任參與程度之關聯。發現企業社會責任參與程度與技術效率及成本效率皆為正向關係,表示企業社會責任參與越高的銀行,對其技術效率及成本效率有著正向的幫助;而規模效率的部分則為負相關,推斷應為CSR投入之成本影響所致。
    參考文獻: 1. 林炳文. (2002). 臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析: 資料包絡分析法的應用. 台灣管理學刊, 1(2), 341-355.
    2. 馬裕豐. (1993). 交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文.
    3. Adam, A. M., & Shavit, T. (2008). How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in CSR?. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 899-905.
    4. Aigner, D. J. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line. Working Paper, Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine.
    5. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
    6. Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 419-445.
    7. Bancilhon, F., Maier, D., Sagiv, Y., & Ullman, J. D. (1985, June). Magic sets and other strange ways to implement logic programs. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD symposium on Principles of database systems (pp. 1-15). ACM.
    8. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
    9. Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., & Wachtel, P. (2005). Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries. Journal of banking & finance, 29(1), 31-53.
    10. Chen, T. Y., & Yeh, T. L. (2000). A measurement of bank efficiency, ownership and productivity changes in Taiwan. Service Industries Journal, 20(1), 95-109.
    11. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    12. Drake, L., & Hall, M. J. (2003). Efficiency in Japanese banking: An empirical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 891-917.
    13. Drake, L., Hall, M. J., & Simper, R. (2006). The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: A non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong’s banking system. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(5), 1443-1466
    14. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640.
    15. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
    16. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
    17. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Corporate ethics and corporate governance, 173-178.
    18. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & society, 36(1), 5-31.
    19. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & society, 36(1), 5-31.
    20. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Annual Synthesis 2002. National Center for Family and Community Connections with Schools.
    21. Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. New Zealand Business Roundtable.
    22. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781-789.
    23. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of management review, 20(2), 404-437.
    24. Miller, S. M., & Noulas, A. G. (1996). The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(3), 495-509.
    25. Moody-Stuart, M. (1999). Foreword (supplement), Responsible business. Financial Times, 2.
    26. Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197-209.
    27. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    28. Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543.
    29. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    30. Sherman, H. D., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of banking & finance, 9(2), 297-315.
    31. Staub, R. B., e Souza, G. D. S., & Tabak, B. M. (2010). Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach. European journal of operational research, 202(1), 204-213.
    32. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of management review, 10(3), 540-557.
    33. Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic management journal, 77-83.
    34. Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529-3547.
    35. Yue, P. (1992). Data envelopment analysis and commercial bank performance: a primer with applications to Missouri banks. IC² Institute Articles.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    104352024
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104352024
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[金融學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    202401.pdf748KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋