English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71437/104396 (68%)
造訪人次 : 19139178      線上人數 : 531
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 問題と研究 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/104981
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104981


    題名: 戦後70 年の「安倍談話」について--発表に至る政治過程
    其他題名: 關於戰後70 年「安倍談話」:發表之政治過程(Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Statement on the 70th Anniversary of the End of the Second World War: An Analysis of the Political Process behind the Release )
    作者: 丹羽文生
    關鍵詞: 戰後70 年;村山談話;小泉談話;21 世紀構想懇談會;70th Anniversary of the End of the Second World War;Tomiichi Murayama’s Statement;Junichiro Koizumi’s Statement;The Advisory Panel on the History of the 20th Century and on Japan’s Role and World Order in the 21st Century
    日期: 2015-12
    上傳時間: 2016-12-15 18:35:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 2015 年8 月14 日正值第二次大戰後70 年,安倍晉三發表談話,企圖傳達其對日本過去與未來的想法。其最大焦點為安倍如何針對在前述戰爭中,針對日本對「殖民統治」與「侵略」行為表達悔恨與道歉。安倍重申在1995 年8 月15 日戰後50 年之「村山談話」,以及10年後,戰後60 年之「小泉談話」的內容。安倍談話可謂異常地受到國際社會之關注。中國、韓國在事前持續表達不滿。歐美媒體也強力批評安倍為「歷史修正主義者」。但日本既然已有官方說法,為何需要提出新的談話?為何安倍執意提出新的談話?在檢視村山談話、小泉談話發表之始末後,本文旨在釐清安倍對前述聲明的觀點,及檢視安倍發表聲明之政治過程。
    On August 14, 2015, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe released a statement marking the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II. Abe attempted to convey his views on Japan’s past and the future. However, the main focus of the statement was how Abe referred to the “remorse” and “apology” for Japan’s “colonial rule” and “aggression” during WWII. Abe reiterated what has been mentioned in the statements by former prime ministers Tomiichi Murayama and Junichiro Koizumi―issued respectively on August 15, 1995 on the 50th anniversary of the end of WWII, and 10 years later, the 60th anniversary. Abe’s statement drew what could be described as an extraordinary attention from international society. As Abe has triggered animosity from both the Chinese and South Korean governments long before the release of his statement, many American and European media have persistently criticized Abe as a “historical revisionist.” Why propelled Abe to release a statement as such, despite the existence of country’s official account of the matter? Was a new statement really necessary? Examining the background of how Murayama and Koizumi’s statements were formed, this paper aims to clarify Abe’s views on the previous statements, and discusses the political process up until the release of Abe’s own statement.
    關聯: 問題と研究,44(4),61-89
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[問題と研究] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML87檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋