English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 75035/106099 (71%)
Visitors : 19430965      Online Users : 537
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 政大學報 > 第79期 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/104811
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104811


    Title: 為密勒坎(Millikan)的目的論語意學辯護
    Other Titles: A Defense of Millikan's Teleosemantics
    Authors: 藍亭
    Lane, Timothy
    Contributors: 心研所
    Keywords: 語意學;目的論;心靈表徵;天擇;說明 說明
    semantics;teleology;mentalrepresentation;evolutionaryselection;explanation
    Date: 1999-12
    Issue Date: 2016-12-12 16:54:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 對密勒坎目的論觀點之語意學的主要批評是皮托司基(Pietroski)的指控:1.在密勒坎的理論中可能心靈表徵與引起它們的肇因完全不連貫;2.密勒坎沒有提出對其理論的否證條件;3.她的觀點極端且不能提供充分的動機;4.她忽略了未被選擇的分辨能力可能在意向性說明中扮演的角色;以及5.她把目的論及意向性的說明混為一談。雖然皮托司基的批評,特別是第一項,直覺上有某種程度的說服力,但我論證它的實質內涵並不若表面所呈現的重要,且不能對密勒坎的語意學構成挑戰。此外,我嘗試說明密勒坎的理論不只適用於天擇的個案,也適用於人類的學習。再者,我提出了密勒坎的理論中,那些部分予以修改或許是適當的,而那些部分在我們達到某種概念上的澄清及更了解相關的經驗科學資料之前,是不能有所進展的。
    Typical of the criticisms leveled at Millikan's teleosemantics are Pietroski's charges: (1) under Millikan's theory it can be the case that items of content are completely disconnected from that which causes them; (2) Millikan fails to identify conditions that would count against her theory; (3) her view is radically revisionary but she provides no independent motivation for it; (4) she ignores the role unselected discriminating abilities may play in intentional explanation; and, (5) she conflates teleological and intentional explanation. Although Pietroski's criticisms, especially (1), have a measure of intuitive appeal, I argue that they are less substantial than they might appear and that they do not constitute a serious challenge to Millikan's semantic theory. I defend Millikan's position through conceptual analysis, thought experiment, and data from evolutionary biology. To demonstrate how teleosemantics can be expanded, I attempt to show it is applicable not just to cases of evolutionary selection, but also to human learning. Furthermore, I identify places where revision of Millikan's theory might be in order and places where we are unlikely to make substantial progress until we achieve certain conceptual refinements and a greater understanding of relevant empirical phenomena.
    Relation: 國立政治大學學報,79,1-38
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[第79期] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    79-1-38.pdf2775KbAdobe PDF176View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback