English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118693 (75%)
Visitors : 23572115      Online Users : 259
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101233


    Title: 知識管理與創新能力對於企業策略型態的影響-以N公司為例
    The Impacts of Knowledge Management and Innovation Ability on Strategic Types -The Case Study of Company N
    Authors: 吳佳春
    Wu, Chia Chune
    Contributors: 吳豐祥
    Wu, Feng Shang
    吳佳春
    Wu, Chia Chune
    Keywords: 知識管理
    創新能力
    策略型態
    醫療器材產業
    白地策略
    企業轉型
    新事業
    Knowledge Management
    Innovation Ability
    Strategic Types
    Medical Device Industry
    White Space Strategy
    Corporate Transformation
    New Venture
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-09-02 01:24:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一個企業在永續經營的過程中,面對不斷追求成長或改變的市場需求,而由於環境的變化,對於企業不論是內部與外部所造成的衝擊,都會迫使企業不得不轉型。
    本研究將所屬在醫學美容產業中的個案公司,如何透過代理的消耗性醫療器材產品,開始進行轉型之企業個案進行研究,主要探討企業在追求持續成長的過程中,為了拓展新市場如何透過知識管理、創新能力與策略的擬定,並重新配置和有效地利用自身的有限資源,藉由透過一連串的活動後,以累積自身的核心能力,跨入一個不屬於公司現行的商業活動範圍,進而開展出一新事業。

    本研究發現得到的結論是:
    1. 企業組織中的知識管理與成員的學習能力,是推動經營策略到培養創新能力的關鍵性角色。
    2. 企業利用與顧客間高度互動的知識交流與學習機制,建立共同成長路徑,與培養良好關係,以跨越進入新市場的門檻。
    3. 創新能力是累積競爭優勢的關鍵來源。
    4. 對於轉型的企業來說,其競爭優勢及轉型能力的來源,則來自於創新能力的培養。
    5. 企業透過有利知識創造的環境與流程,以及良善的顧客互動關係,得以創造進入下一策略位置所需的知識,與突破進入新領域的知識門檻。
    An enterprise in the process of sustainable management, facing the constant pursuit of growth and change of market demand, and due to changes in the environment, regarding the enterprise whether caused by internal and external impact, will force firms to transformation.
    This study belongs in the medical cosmetic industry in case study of the company, how to through an agent by the consumable medical device product, to study for transformation of the enterprise case. Focus on enterprises in the pursuit of sustained growth in the process. How to through knowledge management, innovation ability and strategic formulation to develop the new markets? And, to reconfigure and effectively use for its limited resources, and by through a series of activities to accumulate their own core competencies. The case study of the company entered a not belong to the company's existing scope of business activities, and to carry out a new business.

    The conclusions of this research are:
    1. The knowledge management and learning ability in the enterprise, is to promote the business strategy to foster innovation in a key role.
    2. Use for highly interactive of knowledge exchange and learning mechanism with customer in the enterprise. To establishment of a common growth pathway and cultivating good relations. That can be across into new market.
    3. The innovation ability is a key source of cumulative for competitive advantage.
    4. For the transformation of enterprises, the source of competitive advantage and transformation ability are cultivating innovation ability.
    5. Enterprises have to create a favorable for environment and processes of knowledge creation, and the good interaction with customer that able to create into next strategic filed for knowledge and to breakthrough into the knowledge threshold of the new domain.
    Reference: 一、 中文部份
    1. 于卓民、方至民、王維元、古永嘉、吳豐祥、呂鴻德、佘日新、林耀欽、邱冠燿、洪鉛財、徐木蘭、耿筠、張世佳、郭憲章、陳志遠、陳振遠、陳振燧、廖文志、劉常勇(2007)。策略創新佈局藍海-中小企業升級轉型成功的20堂課。台北:經濟部中小企業處。
    2. 司徒達賢(2003)。策略管理案例解析:觀念與實例。智勝文化。
    3. 多明尼克.佛芮(2007)。知識經濟學:一種愈分享、愈豐富的學問。周宜芳譯。台北:天下文化。
    4. 吳思華(2000)。策略九說:策略思考的本質。台北:臉譜出版社。
    5. 周千玉(2012)。台灣醫學美容保養品產業先進者優勢探討。國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
    6. 林怡欣、林淑綿、周文凱、張慈映、黃裕斌、蔡孟男、謝秀欣(2016)。2016醫療器材產業年鑑。工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
    7. 胡政源(2005)。科技創新管理。台北:新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
    8. 桃樂絲.李奧納德-巴登(Dorothy Leonard-Barton)(1998)。知識創新之泉:智價企業的經營。王美音譯。台北:遠流。
    9. 馬克.強生(2010)。白地策略:打造無法模仿的市場新規則。林麗冠譯。台北:天下文化。
    10. 陳明章(1996)。企業轉型的經營策略與作法,編入扭轉乾坤-台灣企業完突變局的成功實例。中華民國管理科學學會,pp. 13-42。
    11. 麥可.波特(1998)。競爭策略:產業環境及競爭者分析。周旭華譯。台北:天下文化。
    12. 湯明哲(2003)。策略精論:基礎篇。台北:天下文化。
    13. 蔡呈芳(2014)。美容醫學第一章 微整形正夯。台北:健康世界。
    14. 藥事法(2015)。衛生福利部。

    二、 英文部份
    1. Ali, A., Krapfel, R. Jr., and Labahn, D., (1995). Product Innovationess and Entry Strategy: Impact on Cycle Time and Break-even Time, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(1), 54-70.
    2. Anderson, R. E. and Srinivasan, S. S., (2003). E-Satisfaction and E-Loyalty: A Contingency Framework, Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 123-138.
    3. Ansoff, H. I., (1968). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    4. Auh, S. and Menguc, B., (2005). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity, Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1652-1661.
    5. Avlonitis, G. J., Kouremenos, A., and Tzokas, N., (1994). Assessing the Innovativeness of Organizations and its Antecedents: Project Innovstrat, European Journal of Marketing, 28(11), 5-28.
    6. Badaracco, J., (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. pp. 129-146.
    7. Barney, L. B., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
    8. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., and Zhao, Y., (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
    9. Capon, N., Dranove, D., and Shanley, M., (1996). The Economics of Strategy, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
    10. Cooper, J. R., (1998). A Multidimensional Approach to the Adoption of Innovation, Management Science, 36(8), 493-502.
    11. Damanpour, F., (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderator, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
    12. Danneels, E., and Kleinschmidt, E. J., (2001). Product Innovativeness from the Firm’s Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Product Selection and Performance, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357-373.
    13. Davenport, T. H., (1997). Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies, Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.
    14. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L., (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    15. Dodgson, M., (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
    16. Drucker, P. F., (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship-Practice and Principles, NY: Harper Business.
    17. Dulger, M., Candidate, P. D., Alpay, G., Bodur, M., and Yilmaz, C., (2011). How Do Learning Focus and Strategic Choice Influence Innovativeness, The Business Review, 18(1), 69-76.
    18. Govindarajan, V., and Gupta, A. K., (2001). Strategic Innovation: A Conceptual Road Map, Business Horizon, 44(4), 3-10.
    19. Hamel, G., (1998). Strategy Innovation and the Quest for Value, Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 7-14.
    20. Hedlund, G., (1994). A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-form Corporation, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73-90.
    21. Henard, D. H. and Szymanski, D. M., (2001). Why Some New Products are More Successful Than Other, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375.
    22. Hitt, M. A., Ireland R. D., and Hoskisson R. E., (1995). Strategic Management - Competitiveness and Globalization, West Publ. Comp.
    23. Hofer, C. W., and Schendel D., (1978). Strategy Formulation; Analytical Concepts, West Publishing Co.
    24. Holt, K., (1985). User-Oriented Product Innovation-Some Research Findings, Technovation, 3(3), 199-208.
    25. Hult G., Hurley R. F., and Knight G. A., (2004). Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438.
    26. Jacobson, R., (1992). The ‘Austrian’ School of Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 782-870.
    27. Johne, A., (1994). Listening to the Voice of the Market, International Marketing Review, 11(1), 47-59.
    28. Kim, C. W., and Mauborgne, R., (1999). Creating New Market Space, Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 83-93.
    29. Kitchell, S., (1997). CEO Characteristics and Technological Innovativeness: A Canadian Perspective, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 111-125.
    30. Kogut, B., and Zander, A., (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
    31. Lavy, A., and Merry, U., (1988). Organizational Transformation: Revitalizing Organization for A Competitive World, Jessey-Bass Inc.
    32. Leonard-Barton, D., (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
    33. Lin, C. H., Peng, C. H., and Kao, D. T., (2008). The Innovativeness Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Business Performance, International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 752-772.
    34. Markides, C., (1998). Strategic Innovation in Established Companies, Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 31-42.
    35. McKeown, I., and Philip, G., (2003). Business Transformation, Information Technology and Competitive Strategies: Learning to Fly, International Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 3-24.
    36. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link, Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-35.
    37. Mullen, T. P., and Lyles, M. A., (1993). Toward Improving Management Development's Contribution to Organizational Learning, Human Resource Planning, 16(2), 35-50.
    38. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
    39. Nonaka, I., (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
    40. Polanyi, M., (1967).The Tacit Dimension, New York: M. E. Sharp Inc.
    41. Porter, M. E., (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.
    42. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S., (1996). Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best, Harvard Business Review, 84, 71-80.
    43. Rhee, J., Taekyung, P., and Lee, D. H., (2010). Drivers of Innovativeness and Performance for Innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of Learning Orientation, Technovation, 30(1), 65-75.
    44. Robbins, S. P., (1990). Organization Theory: Structure Design and Applications, Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
    45. Schlegelmilch, B., Diamantopoulos, A., and Kreuz, P., (2003). Strategic Innovation: The Construct, its Drivers and its Strategic Outcomes, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(2), 117-132.
    46. Schumpeter, J. A., (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, MA: Harvard University Press.
    47. Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., and Park, C.W., (2001). Cross-functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer products, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 73-85.
    48. Sull, D. N., (1999). Why Good Companies Go Bad, Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 42-52.
    49. Sundbo, J., (1997). Management of Innovation in Services, Service Industries Journal, 17(3), 432-455.
    50. Tushman, M., and Nadler, D., (1986). Organizing for Innovation, California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
    51. Utterback, J. M., (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    52. Wang, C. L., and Ahmed, P. K., (2004). The Development and Validation of the Organizational Innovativeness Construct Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313.
    53. Wolfe, R. A., (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions, Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-431.
    54. Yin, R. K., (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    55. Zack, M., (1999). Managing Codified Knowledge, Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
    56. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., and Holbek, J., (1973). Innovations and Organizations, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    三、 網際網路
    1. 妮傲絲翠企業網站。http://www.neoasia.com.tw.
    2. 富含血小板血漿治療方法能減少膝關節骨性關節炎患者的疼痛和改善功能。
    Retrieved June 20 2016, from: http://www.news-medical.net/news/20101120/85 70/Traditional-Chinese.aspx
    3. Johnson & Johnson to Acquire NeoStrata, Retrieved April 28 2016, from: http:// www.cosmeticsdesign.com/Business-Financial/Johnson-Johnson-to-acquire-NeoStrata.
    4. History of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy, Retrieved May 19 2016, from: http://www.prolotherapy.com/PlateletRichPlasmaProlotherapy.php.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    99359015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099359015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback