English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88645/118187 (75%)
Visitors : 23499395      Online Users : 178
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 廣告學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/101045
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101045


    Title: 邊看邊買—戲劇置入與橫幅廣告相關性研究
    What you see is what you get.The Effect of Congrency between Product placement and Banner
    Authors: 謝諭宣
    Hsieh, Yu Hsuan
    Contributors: 張郁敏
    Chang, Yu Min
    謝諭宣
    Hsieh, Yu Hsuan
    Keywords: 相關性研究
    期望度
    戲劇置入
    橫幅廣告
    邊看邊買
    congruency
    expectancy
    product placement
    banner
    What you see is what you get
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-09-01 23:31:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在現今數位科技發達的現代,隨著網路的發展深入人們的生活,消費娛樂媒介的方式也變得更加多元,以往必須要在電視機前才能收看的戲劇、電影以及綜藝節目,也越來越多人轉為在線上收看。而在觀看線上戲劇通常會出現兩種型態的廣告,一種是廣告主與戲劇節目合作的戲劇置入廣告,另一種則是廣告主在網路播放平台商(如Youtube)上推播的廣告。這兩類型態的廣告大多各自發展,彼此沒有關聯。但近年來,新型態橫幅廣告開始發展,在戲劇節目中出現置入商品時,平台商也於畫面下方也同時推播該置入商品之橫幅廣告。為了解此新型態橫幅廣告之傳播效果,本研究以戲劇置入以及橫幅廣告作為研究對象,使用相關性研究理論之概念來了解新型態橫幅廣告與傳統橫幅廣告的的效果差異以及其在不同置入形式上效果是否有所不同。
    本研究使實驗法,招募80名政治大學非傳播學院之在學生進行研究,研究結果發現新型態橫幅廣告比起傳統橫幅廣告,確實會產生較低的期望度,但期望度的中介效果皆未見顯著。而置入形式與期望度僅有在品牌態度上有顯著交互作用。但值得一提的是,在不考慮期望度的影響下,新型態橫幅廣告比起傳統橫幅廣告確實使消費者產生較好的品牌回想以及橫幅廣告態度。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    陶振超(2011)。〈媒介訊息如何獲得注意力:突出或相關?認知取徑媒體研究之觀點〉。新聞學研究, (107), 245-290.。
    陳盈汝(2000)。〈強迫性網路廣告的效果研究〉。國立中央大學企業管理所碩士論文。
    外文文獻
    Berlyne, D.E., 1960. Conflict, Curiosity, and Arousal. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Beeri, C., & Bernstein, P. A. (1979). Computational problems related to the design of normal form relational schemas. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 4(1), 30-59.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Benway, J. P., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss “obvious” links. ITG Newsletter, 1(3).
    Bhatnagar, N., Aksoy, L., & Malkoc, S. A. (2004). Embedding brands within media content: The impact of message, media, and consumer characteristics on placement efficacy. The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion, 99-116.
    Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407.
    Crocker, J., Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Schematic bases of belief change. In Attitudinal judgment (pp. 197-226). Springer New York.
    Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89-98.
    Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of consumer research, 1-31.
    Fleck, N. D., & Quester, P. (2007). Birds of a feather flock together… definition, role and measure of congruence: An application to sponsorship. Psychology & Marketing, 24(11), 975-1000.
    Fleck, N. D., Michel, G., & Gatignon, H. (2012). The dual process of co-branded new products: Why fit is not all that matters. Working Paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.
    Gupta, P. B. & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of
    prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research
    in Advertising, 20(1), 47-59.
    Garretson, A. J. , D. Fisher, and S. Bruton 2002. Antecedents of private label attitude and national brand promotion attitude: similarities and differences » Journal of Retailing 78:91-99.
    Gunawardena, T. (2013). When subtle is the most effective. An analysis of product placement effectiveness in multitasking environments (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
    Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research, 475-492.
    Homer, P. M. (2009). Product Placements: The Impact of Placement in Journal of Advertising. Academic Research Library, Fall (38), 3.
    Luke, C. (1985). Television discourse processing: A schema theoretic approach. Communication Education, 34(2), 91-105.
    Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D., & Potter, R. F. (2000). The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much?. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 94-109.
    Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity. The Journal of Marketing, 97-105.
    Karrh, J. A., McKee, K. B., & Pardun, C. J. (2003). Practitioners' evolving views on product placement effectiveness. Journal of advertising research, 43(02), 138-149.
    Kozary, B., & Baxter, S. (2010). The influence of product placement prominence on consumer attitudes and intentions: A theoretical framework. University of Newcastle.
    Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of consumer research, 26(2), 156-169.
    Loef, J., & Verlegh, P. W. (2002). Cognitive and Affective Consequences of Two Types of Incongruent Advertising.
    Liu, X., Hu, M. Y., & Grimm, P. E. (2010). Affect transfer in brand extensions: the role of expectancy and relevancy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(5), 317-326.
    Melton, A. W. (1963). Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(1), 1-21.
    Mehmet, I., Abhijit, B. and Sujay, D. (2009),”Effects of Comparative Advertising Format on Consumer Responses: The Moderating Effects of Brand Image and Attribute Relevance,” Journal of Business Research ,Vol.62, 768-774.
    Mitchell, Andrew A., and Jerry C. Olson, (1981). "Are Product a Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude." Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 318-332.
    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(1), 69.
    Rieger, D., Bartz, F., & Bente, G. (2014). Reintegrating the Ad. Journal of Media Psychology.
    Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Van de Sompel, D., Van Loock, N., & Vermeir, I. (2011). The impact of brand name placement in song lyrics on brand attitudes: does the attitude toward the artist matter?. In Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2) (pp. 21-33). Gabler.
    Wright, P. (1980). Message-evoked thoughts: Persuasion research using thought verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 151-175.
    Williams, K., Petrosky, A., Hernandez, E., & Page, R. (2011). Product placement effectiveness: revisited and renewed. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 7(1), 1-24.
    網路資料
    創世際創市際雙週刊(2015)。〈2014年網路使用行為調查與台灣網路使用概況回顧〉。上網日期:2015年02月16日,取自https://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/255895775?access_key=key-xa54W4RnUEfz7Q3961Dd&allow_share=true&escape=false&show_recommendations=false&view_mode=scroll
    創世際創市際雙週刊(2015)。〈影音網站調查與台灣影音相關網站使用概況
    〉。上網日期:2015年09月,取自https://zh.scribd.com/document/281092371/InsightXplorer-Biweekly-Report-20150915#fullscreen&from_embed
    創世際新聞室(2014)。〈創市際兩岸洞察:電視劇《16個夏天》人氣高漲,帶動置入品牌好感度〉。上網日期:2014年10月31日,取自http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_10_31_14.html
    競業信息(2015)。〈台灣地區民眾消費意向調查報告-【智慧型手機】〉。上網日期:2015年10月,取自http://www.rmb.com.tw/images/html/downloadfile/%E8%BF%918%E6%88%90%E6%B0%91%E7%9C%BE%E6%93%81%E6%9C%89%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E5%9E%8B%E6%89%8B%E6%A9%9F.pdf
    財團法人資訊工業策進會(2015)。〈2014年我國家庭寬頻現況與需求調查-個人篇〉。上網日期:2015年07月14日,取自http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?k=2&n_ID=8466
    YAHOO!奇摩網路行銷(2014)。〈資策會FIND: 2014年上半年消費者行為調查出爐〉。上網日期:2014年08月22日,取自http://yahoo-emarketing.tumblr.com/post/120006251941/find-2014
    數位時代(2014)。〈影音電商會成為一門好生意嗎?〉。上網日期:2014年11月04日,取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/34280
    三立新聞網(2015)。〈影音平台新趨勢─邊看邊買〉。上網日期:2015年08月07日,取自:http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=88723
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣告學系
    102452010
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024520104
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[廣告學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    010401.pdf15473KbAdobe PDF328View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback