English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23459535      Online Users : 200
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101028

    Title: 專利侵權損害賠償決策因子之研究-以台灣智慧財產法院之實證判決為基礎
    Other Titles: A Research on Deciding Factors of Patent Infringement Damages: An Empirical Analysis of Cases in the Taiwan IP Court
    Authors: 桂祥豪;熊誦梅;蘇瓜藤
    Kuei, Hsiang-Hao;Hsiung, Sung-Mei;Su, Robert K.
    Keywords: 專利;專利侵權;智慧財產法院;專利侵權損害賠償
    Patent;patent infringement;Taiwan Intellectual Property Court;patent-damage calculation theories
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2016-08-31 17:11:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討損害賠償計算方法理論對請求金額與判賠金額間差距幅度之影響。本文以請求金額與判賠金額的差距幅度作為應變數,以三大損害賠償計算方法作為解釋變數,並設定三大群組變數作為控制變數。本文之樣本為智財法院所審理之專利侵權求償判決,樣本期間為2008年9月至2010年9月。本文所建立之回歸模型解釋該差距幅度的變異量達45.1%。實證結果顯示,我國專利侵權損害賠償訴訟之差距幅度,顯著地受到總利益說及總銷售額說之兩種損害賠償計算方法的影響,但受合理權利金說之影響並不顯著。該等實證結果指出,總利益說的採用對於縮短請求差距幅度的影響能力,優於總銷售額說,代表著專利權人於訴訟中應詳盡地提出損害賠償相關事證,以獲得較高的賠償救濟。
    This research explores the association of the patent damage calculation theories with the Variance between the amount of damage claimed and that awarded. Specifically, it tests the relationship between the Variance and three explanatory variables, namely, patent-damage calculation theories based on the profit, sales, and reasonable royalty, along with control variables including the case specifics, patents-at-issue, and litigants information. Its sample includes 186 patent infringement cases decided in Taiwan Intellectual Property Court from September 2008 to September 2010. The empirical regression model explains 45.1% of the variation in the Variance. The results show significant associations of the Variance with the profit approach and the sales approach, but not with the reasonable royalty approach. Such findings point out that the profit approach is more successful at reducing the Variance, implying that the patentee should present more detailed evidence during litigation to get more awards.
    Relation: 政大智慧財產評論, 12(2), 99-152
    NCCU Intellectual Property Review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback