English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23494574      Online Users : 169
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100792

    Title: Joinder of Unrelated Infringers as Defendants in Patent Litigation under the Jurisprudence of the United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas—A Critical Review
    Authors: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2016-08-29 14:33:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) was enacted. 35 U.S.C. § 299 was created to limit district court’s power to permit joinder of unrelated infringers as defendants in a single lawsuit. Before that, district courts apply Rule 20 of the Federal Civil Procedure. The Eastern District of Texas had permitted joinder only because the same patent was infringed. By introducing § 299, Congress intended to abrogate such approach. Later, the Federal Circuit in In re EMC limited the practice of Rule 20 and required a finding of “an actual link between the facts underlying each claim of infringement.” EMC also offered six factors for determination of joinder. However, this article demonstrates that the Eastern District of Texas still prefers joinder of unrelated defendants. The court has taken the “actual link” standard to a next level. The court primarily looks to common facts regarding the accused products or processes. Particularly when products are accused, the third EMC factor “the use of identically sourced components”becomes a dispositive factor. The only rebuttal may be to prove that the accused products are “independently developed products using differently sourced parts.”
    Relation: Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, Vol.98, No.2, pp.155-181
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    410385.pdf166KbAdobe PDF284View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback