English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 75035/106099 (71%)
Visitors : 19430567      Online Users : 542
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100416


    Title: 區段徵收計畫範圍內外農地所有權人對農地價值功能認知之差異比較—以苗栗縣後龍鎮灣寶里為例
    Other Titles: Comparing Attitude Towards Farmland Multiple Functions of Between Local Farmer Owing Farmland Property Inside and Outside Zone Expropriation Project Area: A Case Study of Wanbau Community
    Authors: 王玉真;李承嘉;吳貞儀
    Wang, Yu-Jen;Lee, Chen-Jai;Wu, Chen-Yi
    Keywords: 多功能農業;區段徵收;農地多元功能;灣寶社區
    Multifunctional Agriculture;Zone Expropriation;Multiple Functions of Farmland;Wanbau
    Date: 2015-05
    Issue Date: 2016-08-18 12:00:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 苗栗縣後龍科技園區(位在苗栗縣後龍鎮灣寶里)的區段徵收計畫,因為當地農民極力抗爭反對,最後經內政部區域計畫委員會審議不通過。既有研究多以質化方法得到結果指出,當地農民反對徵收是起於對農地具有多元價值功能的認知。本文則以李克特態度量表,對灣寶里的農民進行問卷調查,並比較徵收區農民(農\r地位於徵收計畫範圍內之農民)及非徵收區農民(農地不在徵收計畫範圍內之農\r民),對於農地價值功能認知的差異。調查結果顯示,徵收區農民對農地多元價值功能的認知普遍高於非徵收區的農民。本文認為,這種情況可能是因為要避免農地被徵收,被徵收區的農民吸收了農地多元價值功能的觀點,並做為抗爭徵收的論述基礎所致。
    The zone expropriation project of the Houlong Industry Park (HIP) did not bring into effect due to strong protest by local farmers. Many studies conducted by qualitative research methods suggest that local farmers having high awareness of multiple functions of farmland would protest zone expropriation. This paper adopts Likert’s scale questionnaires to explore the attitude of farmers living in Wanbau community towards farmland functions. The local farmers were divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2). Group 1 was made up of the local farmers who own or rent farmland inside HIP, and group 2 the local farmer do not own or rent farmland inside HIP. We compared the attitude towards multiple functions between these two groups. The result shows that group 1 has a higher percentage in agreeing with multiple functions of farmland than group 2. This paper suggests a possible reason for this obtained result: group 1 attempt to avoid zone expropriation in the name of multiple functions of farmland and thus they absorb the arguments of multiple functions of farmland.
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 18(1), 45-81
    Journal of Taiwan land research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    18(1)-45-81.pdf679KbAdobe PDF183View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback